Invista North America S.À.R.L. v. Rhodia Polyamide Intermediates S.A.S. (2007)

green · 10 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 7

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Johnson v. Acb Ideas, LLC (2024)

Quote Authority · D.D.C. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Invista N. Am., S.A.R.L. v. Rhodia Polyamide Intermediates S.A.S., 503 F. Supp. 2d 195, 206 (D.D.C. 2007) (“[I]n light of . . . the federal policy in favor of arbitration, this Court holds that ‘arising out of’ creates a broad arbitration agreement.”); Sakyi v. Estée Lauder Cos., Inc., 308 F. Supp. 3d 366, 378 (D.D.C. 2018) (noting that an arbitration clause’s “‘broad, all-encompassing language’ is ‘clear evidence that the parties agreed to arbitrate all issues’ a…

“[I]n light of . . . the federal policy in favor of arbitration, this Court holds that ‘arising out of’ creates a broad arbitration agreement.”

green Schwartz v. Urban Compass, Inc (2020)

Rule Authority · D.D.C.

S.À.R.L. v. Rhodia Polyamide Intermediates S.A.S., the Court very briefly concluded that the plaintiff was “in default in proceeding with . . . arbitration” because it had “refused to arbitrate the claims in its complaint,” so it was ineligible to seek a stay. 503 F. Supp. 2d 195, 207 (D.D.C. 2007) (citing 9 U.S.C. § 3 ).

citing 9 U.S.C. § 3

green Nanko Shipping, USA v. Alcoa, Inc. (2018)

Rule Authority · D.D.C.

S.À.R.L. v. Rhodia Polyamide Intermediates S.A.S., 503 F. Supp. 2d 195, 201 (D.D.C. 2007); Khan v. Parsons Glob.

green Newco Ltd. v. Government of Belize (2015)

Rule Authority · D.D.C.

S.A.R.L. v. Rhodia Polyamide Intermediates S.A.S., 503 F.Supp.2d 195, 201 (D.D.C.2007).

green Johansson v. Cent. Props., LLC (2018)

Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g. , Invista North America S.À.R.L. v. Rhodia Polyamide Intermediates S.A.S. , 503 F.Supp.2d 195 , 206-07 (D.D.C. 2007).

green Tig Insurance Company v. Republic of Argentina (2022)

Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Invista N. Am., S.À.R.L. v. Rhodia Polyamide Intermediates S.A.S., 503 F. Supp. 2d 195 , 201–02 (D.D.C. 2007) (applying contract-law assumption principles to arbitration agreement).

applying contract-law assumption principles to arbitration agreement

green Johansson v. Central Properties, LLC (2018)

Cited (see also) · D.D.C. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Invista North America S.À.R.L. v. Rhodia Polyamide Intermediates S.A.S., 503 F. Supp. 2d 195 , 206–07 (D.D.C. 2007).