Ex Parte Cervantes (1988)

But cf. Ex parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.Crim.App.1988) (granting the relief requested in Cervantes’s application for writ of habeas corpus, where Cervantes had imminent deportation proceedings pending as a result of his final felony conviction), overruled on other grounds by Ex parte Tovar, 901 S.W.2d 484 (Tex.Crim.App.1995); Meraz v. State, 950 S.W.2d 739, 741-42 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1997, no pet.) (addressing Meraz's writ of habeas corpus in a misdemeanor case wh…

STAT. art. 179(e), § 6.04(a) (prerequisite to issuing race track license); id. art. 6243e.2(1), § 6(d)(rebuttal of presumption of on-duty firefighter disability). [52] E.g., Garza v. Maverick Mkt., Inc., 768 S.W.2d 273, 275-276 (Tex.1989) (requiring clear and convincing proof of paternity in wrongful death actions); Bogart v. Somer, 762 S.W.2d 577, 577 (Tex.1988) (per curiam) (requiring clear and convincing proof to refute the presumption of gift). [53] 443 U.S. at 318-319 ,…

Ex parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.Crim.App.1988).

See, Ex parte McAtee, 599 S.W.2d 335, 336 (Tex. Cr.App.1980); Ex parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.CrApp.1988); and, Hughes v. State, 833 S.W.2d 137, 140 . 2 To find substantial compliance in cases where there had been a total failure to admonish would stand Boykin on its head.

Subsequently, however, in Ex parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex. Cr.App.1988), we held: "While admonishments which substantially comply with Article 26.13 are sufficient, the complete failure to comply with an admonishment required by the statute requires reversal.

Bogart v. Somer, 762 S.W.2d 577, 577 (Tex. 1988); Amador v. Berrospe, 961 S.W.2d 205, 207-08 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1996, pet. denied).

See Morales v. State, 872 S.W.2d 753, 754-55 (Tex.Crim.App.1994) (plurality opinion) (requiring reversal when the trial court wholly failed to advise the defendant that if he was not a citizen of the United States, a plea of guilty could result in deportation), overruled, by Cain v. State, 947 S.W.2d 262 (Tex.Crim.App.1997); Ex parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.Crim.App.1988) (same), overruled by Ex parte Tovar, 901 S.W.2d 484 (Tex.Crim.App.1995); Ex parte McAtee, 59…

PROC. art. 26.13. [19] Cain, 947 S.W.2d at 264 (citing Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 309-10 , 111 S.Ct. 1246 , 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991), which held that admission into evidence of an involuntary confession is subject to a harm analysis); see also High, 964 S.W.2d at 638 ; Matchett v. State, 941 S.W.2d 922 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) (plurality opinion). [20] 964 S.W.2d 637 . [21] 947 S.W.2d 262 . [22] 941 S.W.2d 922 . [23] See Morales v. State, 872 S.W.2d 753, 754-55 (Tex.Crim.…

Ex Parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.Crim.App.1988).

In reviewing, on direct appeal, the almost identical situation where the trial court completely failed to admonish the defendant upon his plea of guilty to a felony offense, the Morales Court affirmed its prior decision in Ex parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.Cr.App.1988), that “the complete failure to comply with an admonishment required by the statute [article 26.13(a)(4), supra ] requires reversal,” and held that because of the failure, “a prima fade case was not …

Ex parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.Crim.App.1988).

Morales v. State, 872 S.W.2d 753 , 754-55 *685 (Tex.Crim.App.1994) (en banc) (citing Ex parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.Crim.App.1988) and Ex parte McAtee, 599 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Crim.App.1980)).

Ex parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), citing Ex parte McAtee, 599 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Crim.App.1980); see also Tex.Code Crim.ProoAnn. art. 26.13(c).

Morales, 872 S.W.2d at 754 ; Ex parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.Crim.App.1988); Ex parte McAtee, 599 S.W.2d 335, 336 (Tex.Crim.App.1980).

Ex parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.Crim.Tex.App.1988); Ex parte McAtee, 599 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Crim.App.1980); Reyes v. State, 774 S.W.2d 670 (Tex.App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 1989, no pet.).

Ex parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.Crim.App.1988); Ex parte McAtee, 599 S.W.2d 335 (Tex.Crim.App.1980).

See also Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d at 578 .

See Ex Parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577 , 578 (Tex.Crim.App.1988)(deportation proceeding actually in progress at time of appeal). .

See Bogart v. Somer, 762 S.W.2d 577 (Tex.1988) (per curiam). [6] Diamond Shamrock Corp. v. Ortiz, 753 S.W.2d 238, 241 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1988, writ denied); see also Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc. v. Lieck, 845 S.W.2d 926, 935 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1992, writ granted) ("clear and convincing"); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Medina, 814 S.W.2d 71, 73 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1991, writ denied) (same); Ada Oil Co. v. Dillaberry, 440 S.W.2d 902, 914 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [14th…

See Somer v. Bogart, 749 S.W.2d 202, 203-04 (Tex. App.—Dallas, writ denied), approved 762 S.W.2d 577 (Tex. 1988) (writing on rehearing of writ denial to approve holding that burden to refute presumption of gift is clear and convincing evidence).

See Somer v. Bogart, 749 S.W.2d 202, 204 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1988), writ denied, 762 S.W.2d 577 (Tex.1988) (per curiam), holding that the burden of proof in refuting the presumption of gift by a parent to a child is by clear and convincing evidence. 4 .

Masterson v. Hogue, 842 S.W.2d 696, 697 (Tex.App.-Tyler 1992, no writ); see Somer v. Bogart, 749 S.W.2d 202, 204 (Tex.App. — Dallas 1988), writ denied, Bogart v. Somer, 762 S.W.2d 577 (Tex.1988).

See, e.g., Ex parte Cervantes, 762 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.Crim.App.1988), overruled on other grounds, Cain v. State, 947 S.W.2d 262, 264 (Tex.Crim.App.1997).