Jimenez v. Astrue (2009)
green
· 6 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
The ALJ also noted that Plaintiff “has had a lot of treatment for her GI issues, but 23 her testing and exams have again been normal.” (AR 17). 24 To prove a severe impairment, a claimant must simply demonstrate that “there is 25 more than a minimal effect on [her] ability to do basic work activities.” Jimenez v. Astrue, 26 641 F. Supp. 2d 954, 960 (C.D.
Carpel Tunnel Syndrome as a Non-Severe Impairment 8 To prove a severe impairment, a claimant must simply demonstrate that “there is 9 more than a minimal effect on [her] ability to do basic work activities.” Jimenez v. Astrue, 10 641 F. Supp. 2d 954, 960 (C.D.
Basic work activities include “physical functions such as walking, 21 standing, sitting, lifting, pushing, pulling, reaching, carrying or handling, as well as the 22 capacity for seeing, hearing and speaking, understanding, carrying out, and remembering 23 simple instructions, use of judgment, responding appropriately to supervision, co-workers 24 and usual work situations, and dealing with changes in a routine work setting.” Jimenez v. 25 Astrue, 641 F. Supp. 2d 954, 960 (C…
green
(SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security (2020)
Jimenez 6 v. Astrue, 641 F.Supp.2d 954, 960 (C.D.