Severino v. FREEDOM WOODS, INC. (2010)
green
· 29 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 14 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201220192026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Venturella v. Dreyfuss (2017)
App. 3d 324, 333 (2009)); Severino v. Freedom Woods, Inc., 407 Ill.
green
Venturella v. Dreyfuss (2017)
App. 3d 324, 333 (2009)); Severino v. Freedom Woods, Inc., 407 Ill.
green
Department of Healthcare & Family Services v. Oliver (2023)
Severino v. Freedom Woods, Inc., 407 Ill.
green
Svendsen v. Pritzker (2023)
There, applying a res judicata analysis, the Court cited caselaw which provides “res judicata will bar not only every matter that was actually determined in the first suit, but also every matter that might have been raised and determined in that suit.” See (Doc. 22 at 8) (citing Severino v. Freedom Woods, Inc., 941 N.E.2d 180, 188 (Ill.
green
Svendsen v. Pritzker (2023)
Therefore, any [federal] claims advanced here could have been raised in the state replevin proceedings.” See Severino v. Freedom Woods, Inc., 941 N.E.2d 180, 188 (Ill.
“res judicata will bar not only every matter that was actually determined in the first suit, but also every matter that might have been raised and determined in that suit.”
green
Choi v. Kondaur Capital LLC (2022)
App. 3d 238, 251 , 941 N.E.2d 180, 191 (1st Dist. 2010) (exception applied where the order stated costs were to be paid upon refiling and the docket sheet stated leave to refile was allowed), with Boado, 2012 IL App (2d) 110804, ¶ 22 , 970 N.E.2d at 1218 (exception did not apply where the order was silent on refiling and the defendant moved to strike the portion of plaintiff’s motion asking for leave to refile).
exception applied where the order stated costs were to be paid upon refiling and the docket sheet stated leave to refile was allowed
green
Tolbert v. Chicago Police Department (2021)
Mular v. Ingram, 2016 IL App (1st) 152750, ¶ 15 (quoting Severinno v. Freedom Woods, Inc., 407 Ill.
green
Mular v. Ingram (2017)
Mular further argues that res judicata should not apply to this cause in the interest of fundamental fairness because its application means that she will never be able to present her case to a jury. ¶ 15 “Res judicata is an equitable doctrine that is designed to prevent a multiplicity of lawsuits between the same parties where the facts and issues are the same.” Severino v. Freedom Woods, Inc., 407 Ill.
green
Mular v. Ingram (2016)
Mular further argues that res judicata should not apply to this cause in the interest of fundamental fairness because its application means that she will never be able to present her case to a jury. -6 1-15-2750 ¶ 15 “Res judicata is an equitable doctrine that is designed to prevent a multiplicity of lawsuits between the same parties where the facts and issues are the same.” Severino v. Freedom Woods, Inc., 407 Ill.
green
Hasbun v. Resurrection Health Care Corporation (2015)
App. 3d 608, 610 (1993). ¶ 25 “Res judicata is an equitable doctrine that is designed to prevent a multiplicity of lawsuits between the same parties where the facts and issues are the same.” Severino v. Freedom Woods, Inc., 407 Ill.
green
Hasbun v. Resurrection Health Care Corporation (2015)
App. 3d 608, 610 (1993). -7- No. 1-14-0537 ¶ 25 "Res judicata is an equitable doctrine that is designed to prevent a multiplicity of lawsuits between the same parties where the facts and issues are the same." Severino v. Freedom Woods, Inc., 407 Ill.
green
Law Offices of Nye & Associates v. Boado (2012)
Severino v. Freedom Woods, Inc., 407 Ill.
order stated costs were to be paid upon refiling of the complaint and docket sheet stated leave to refile was allowed
green
Kantner v. Waugh (2017)
See Severino v. Freedom Woods, Inc., 407 Ill.
leave to refile is sufficient
green
Kantner v. Waugh (2017)
See Severvino v. Freedom Woods, Inc., 407 Ill.
leave to refile is sufficient