Johnson v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc. (2002)

green · 10 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 8

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Rosania v. Taco Bell of America, Inc. (2004)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio · 2 citations in this opinion

Mfg., Inc., 221 F.Supp.2d 853, 858 (S.D.Ohio 2002); Rogers v. AC Humko Corp., 56 F.Supp.2d 972, 979 (W.D.Tenn.1999); Schmauch v. Honda of Am.

green Hooper v. Trimble Board of Education (2021)

Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio

Mfg., 221 F. Supp. 2d 853, 858 (S.D.

same

green Trimbach v. Bath Twp. (2021)

Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.

Mfg., Inc., 221 F.Supp.2d 853, 856 (S.D.Ohio 2002).

green Kelley v. Lawrence Public Schools (2018)

Rule Authority · D. Mass.

Mfg., 221 F. Supp. 2d 853, 858 (S.D.

holding that “the remedial scheme set forth in the FMLA adequately protects the public policy expressed in the statute, thereby obviating the need for a common law wrongful discharge claim”

green Rachel Brown v. HCA Health Serv. of NH (2016)

Rule Authority · D.N.H.

Mfg., 221 F. Supp. 2d 853, 859 (S.D.

green Smith v. Grady (2013)

Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio

Mfg., 221 F.Supp.2d 853, 858 (S.D.Ohio 2002) (recognizing that punitive and emotional distress damages are unavailable under the FMLA); Rosania v. Taco Bell of Am., Inc., 303 F.Supp.2d 878, 881-82 (N.D.Ohio 2004) (collecting cases); Cox v. True N. Energy, LLC, 524 F.Supp.2d 927, 948 (N.D.Ohio 2007) (“Under the federal FMLA, a plaintiff is not entitled to recover emotional distress damages or punitive damages.”); Gutierrez v. 78th Judicial Dist.

recognizing that punitive and emotional distress damages are unavailable under the FMLA

green Korslund v. DynCorp Tri-Cities Services, Inc. (2004)

Rule Authority · Wash. Ct. App.

Mfg., Inc., 221 F. Supp. 2d 853, 856 (S.D.

green Korslund v. Dyncorp Tri-Cities Services (2004)

Rule Authority · Wash. Ct. App.

Mfg., Inc., 221 F.Supp.2d 853, 856 (S.D.Ohio 2002), which held a common law tort claim is not necessary if there is an alternative statutory remedy available.