State v. Latona (2011)

green · 7 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 6

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Shedd v. State (2014)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Further, “[t]he prescription defense is not limited to the person holding a valid prescription, but may also be asserted by ‘any individual authorized by the prescription holder of the medications on his or her behalf.’ ” Id. (quoting State v. Latona, 75 So.3d 394, 395 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011)).

green Day v. State (2013)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

The prescription defense may be asserted by “any individual authorized by the prescription holder to hold the medications on his or her behalf.” State v. Latona, 75 So.3d 394, 394 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (citing McCoy, 56 So.3d at 39 ).

citing McCoy, 56 So.3d at 39

green Ramirez v. State (2013)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

The prescription defense is not limited to the person holding a valid prescription, but may also be asserted by “any individual authorized by the prescription holder to hold the medications on his or her behalf.” State v. Latona, 75 So.3d 394, 395 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (citing McCoy, 56 So.3d at 39 ).

citing McCoy, 56 So.3d at 39

green Badgett v. State (2012)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Pursuant to the State’s appropriate concession of error in the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury on Badgett’s “prescription defense,” we reverse and remand for a new trial. 1 Williams v. State, 85 So.3d 1185, 1186 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (reversing for new trial where trial court was of the mistaken apparent belief that the prescription defense was only available to the prescription holder and thus did not instruct jury on that defense); State v. Latona, 75 So.3d 3…

“Section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2009

green Williams v. State (2012)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See State v. Lato- no, 75 So.3d 394, 395 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (“Section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2009) permits an individual to legally possess a controlled substance where the controlled substance was obtained pursuant to a valid prescription.

“Section 893.13(6)(a), Florida Statutes (2009

green Celeste v. State (2012)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See State v. Latona, 75 So.3d 394, 394 (Fla. *900 5th DCA 2011); O’Hara v. State, 964 So.2d 839, 841 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007).