How cited: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds v. Inlet Fisheries, Inc. · Go Syfert

Certain Underwriters at Lloyds v. Inlet Fisheries, Inc. (2005)

green · 9 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · D. Me.
It is unequivocal, however, that uberrimae fidei creates a reciprocal duty on all parties of a marine insurance contract to “accord the other the highest degree of good faith.” Certain Underwriters at Lloyds v. Inlet Fisheries, Inc., 389 F. Supp. 2d 1145, 1171 (D.
Rule Authority · D. Ariz.
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, 4 London v. Inlet Fisheries, Inc., 389 F. Supp. 2d 1145, 1154 (D.
expert with 5 “many years of experience in the insurance business” but only “minimal” and “sporadic” 6 experience “with respect to underwriting marine pollution policies” was “not qualified to 7 testify as an expert on underwriting marine pollution insurance policies”
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Such testimony is also “competent evidence of industry standards.” Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Inlet Fisheries, Inc., 389 F.Supp.2d 1145, 1168 (D.Alaska 2005), aff'd, 518 F.3d 645 (9th Cir.2008).
Rule Authority · E.D. Ky.
Co., 815 F.2d 890, 903 (3d Cir.1987), the Third Circuit upheld the trial court’s decision to exclude the opinions of a claims examiner regarding the value of a potential jury verdict and the claim’s settlement value, finding that she “had several years experience as a claims adjuster, but she was not shown to have any experience with claims approaching the magnitude presented by this case.” Similarly, in Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Inlet Fisheries, Inc., 389 F.…
Rule Authority · W.D. Mo.
In Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Inlet Fisheries, Inc., 389 F.Supp.2d 1145, 1154 (D.Alaska 2005), the court disqualified as an expert on marine pollution insurance policies a man who had nearly 50 years experience in the insurance industry: Despite many years of experience in the insurance business, with respect to underwriting marine pollution policies Wilton’s experience is minimal, sporadic, and concerning stand-alone policies of the type at issue in the case …
Cited (see also) · D. Ariz. · signal: see, e.g.
The touchstone “is not the qualifications of a witness in the abstract, but whether those qualifications provide a foundation for a witness to answer a specific question.” Berry v. City of Detroit, 25 F.3d 1342, 1351 (6th Cir. 1994); see, e.g., Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London v. Inlet Fisheries, Inc., 389 F.Supp.2d 1145 (D.