National Home Insurance v. King (2003)

green · 25 citation events across 9 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 10

Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

200920172026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Scott v. Louisville Bedding Co. (2013)

Rule Authority · Ky. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Co. v. King, 291 F.Supp.2d 518, 530 (E.D.Ky.2003), the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky held that “the McCar-ran-Ferguson Act does ‘reverse preempt’ the FAA to save KRS 417.050(2) from federal preemption.” Triton Lines is distinguishable for two reasons: (1) the dispute arose from a maritime contract containing an arbitration clause; and (2) as noted below, the analysis in Triton Lines is so superficial as to be unpersuasive.

green Legacy Consulting Group, LLC v. Brenda Gutzman, in Her Capacity as the of the Estate of Grace W. McGaughey (2021)

Rule Authority · Ky.

Co. v. King, 291 F. Supp. 2d 518, 527 (E.D.

noting well- established principle that “whether a particular contract is one of insurance does not depend on what it is called, but what it does[]”

green Zeigler v. Housing Authority of New Orleans (2016)

Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.

Co. v. King, the court similarly noted: When Congress expanded [the LRRA] in 1986 to cover all types of liability insurance, “it included provisions to preserve the states’ traditional role in regulating insurance and protecting the public.” [ ] In doing so, Congress sought to “augment[] the authority of non-chartering States to regulate solvency, trade practices and other matters” and it “contemplated that States may enact statutes and issue regulations to protect the publi…

citations omitted

green the Fredericksburg Care Company, L.P. v. Juanita Perez, Virginia Garcia, Paul Zapata, and Sylvia Sanchez, Ind… (2015)

Rule Authority · Tex.

Co. v. King, 291 F. Supp. 2d 518, 529 (E.D.

green Fredericksburg Care Co. v. Perez (2015)

Rule Authority · Tex.

Co. v. King, 291 F.Supp.2d 518, 529 (E.D.Ky.2003) (surveying cases and concluding that “both federal and state courts have held that state statutes that invalidate arbitration clauses specifically as to insurance contracts are indeed ‘enacted for the purpose of regulating the business of insurance’ and thus not preempted by the FAA by virtue of the [MFA] ”).

green Speece v. Allied Professionals Ins. Co. (2014)

Rule Authority · Neb.

Co. v. King, 291 F. Supp. 2d 518, 531 (E.D.

prohibiting enforcement of arbitration clause did not “‘make unlawful’” operation of risk retention group and put it on equal footing with other insurers

green Sturgeon v. Allied Professionals Insurance Co. (2011)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Co., 291 F.Supp.2d at 531 (application of an anti-arbitration statute to a risk retention group does not offend the non-discrimination principle underlying the LRRA; to the contrary, requiring a risk retention group to abide by this statute puts it on equal footing with all other insurers who are prohibited from enforcing arbitration clauses in agreements with their insureds).

green Ernst & Young, LLP v. Clark (2010)

Rule Authority · Ky.

Co. v. King, 291 F.Supp.2d 518 *689 (E.D.Ky.2003).

green AXA Equitable Life Insurance v. Infinity Financial Group, LLC (2009)

Rule Authority · S.D. Fla.

Co. v. King, 291 F.Supp.2d 518, 528 (E.D.Ky.2003) (citing Stephens v. American Int’l Ins.

green Wadsworth v. Allied Professionals Insurance (2014)

Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see

See Nat’l Home, 291 F.Supp.2d at 524 , quoting Ky.Rev.Stat.