State v. Goins (2004)
green
· 31 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200420152026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Givens v. State (2016)
App. Ct. 1998) (The “defendant’s failure to raise the issue of the jury’s legally inconsistent verdicts at trial or in a post-trial motion does not result in a waiver of that issue because legally inconsistent verdicts present plain error, the exception to the rule of waiver.” (Citation omitted)); State v. Goins, 92 P.3d 181, 183 (Wash. 2004) (The defendant “assigned error to the apparently irreconcilably inconsistent nature of the general and special verdicts. [The defendan…
green
United States v. Frank Randolph (2015)
See United States v. Lucarelli, 476 F.Supp.2d 163, 167 (D.Conn.2007) (acquitting defendant of securities fraud charges where jury, in special interrogatories, found that defendant did not act with specific intent, despite finding defendant guilty in general verdict); see also State v. Goins, 151 Wash.2d 728 , 92 P.3d 181, 189-90 (2004) (en banc) (Sanders, J., dissenting).
en banc
green
State v. Duran (2009)
See also State v. Goins, 151 Wash.2d 728 , 92 P.3d 181, 185 (2004) (concluding that “because the legislature did not classify second degree assault with the intent to commit indecent liberties as a sex offense, the legislature did not see fit to require every person convicted of that general crime to register as a sex offender upon release”) (emphasis in original).
concluding that “because the legislature did not classify second degree assault with the intent to commit indecent liberties as a sex offense, the legislature did not see fit to require every person convicted of that general crime to register as a sex offender upon release”
green
Cain v. State (2005)
See also State v. Goins, 151 Wash.2d 728 , 92 P.3d 181, 185 (2004) (holding that “because the legislature did not classify second degree assault with the intent to commit indecent liberties as a sex offense, the legislature did not see fit to require every person convicted of that general crime to register as a sex offender upon release.”) (emphasis in original).
holding that “because the legislature did not classify second degree assault with the intent to commit indecent liberties as a sex offense, the legislature did not see fit to require every person convicted of that general crime to register as a sex offender upon release.”
green
State v. Mullin-Coston (2004)
See, e.g., Goins, slip op. at 11, 151 Wash.2d at ___ , 92 P.3d 181 (refusing to overturn a guilty verdict that conflicted with a special verdict on the same charge); McNeal, 145 Wash.2d at 359 , 37 P.3d 280 (refusing to overturn a guilty verdict that conflicted with a special finding on another charge); Ng, 110 Wash.2d at 48 , 750 P.2d 632 (refusing to overturn guilty verdicts that were inconsistent with acquittals on other counts).