How cited: Feuerzeig v. Innovative Communication Corp. · Go Syfert

Feuerzeig v. Innovative Communication Corp. (2001)

green · 8 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 6
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green Lower Love S.S., Inc. v. Ginseng Up Corp. (2008)
Rule Authority · D.V.I. · 2 citations in this opinion
Discussion A federal court has original jurisdiction to hear “only those cases in which a well-pleaded complaint establishes either that federal law creates the cause of action or that the plaintiff’s right to relief necessarily depends on resolution of a substantial question of federal law.” Feuerzeig v. Innovative Communication Corp., 174 F. Supp. 2d 349, 352 (D.V.I. 2001) (citing Franchise Tax Bd. Of State of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for S. Cal., 463 U…
citing Franchise Tax Bd. Of State of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for S. Cal., 463 U.S. 1, 27-28 , 103 S. Ct. 2841 , 77 L. Ed. 2d 420 (1983)
green Grammer v. Melnik (2008)
Rule Authority · D.V.I. · 2 citations in this opinion
See 28 U.S.C. § 1441 (a); Feuerzeig v. Innovative Communication Corp., 174 F. Supp. 2d 349, 352 (D.V.I. 2001).
green Malone v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London (2022)
Rule Authority · D.V.I.
Generally, “[f]ederal removal statutes ‘are to be strictly construed against removal and all doubts are to be resolved in favor of remand.’” Feuerzeig v. Innovative Communications Corp., 174 F. Supp. 2d 349, 353 (D.V.I. 2001) (quoting Boyer v. Snap–On Page 6 of 12 Tools Corp., 913 F.2d 108, 111 (3d Cir. 1990)).
quoting Boyer v. Snap–On Page 6 of 12 Tools Corp., 913 F.2d 108, 111 (3d Cir. 1990)
green Cotto v. Toliver (2022)
Rule Authority · D.V.I.
Generally, “[f]ederal removal statutes ‘are to be strictly construed against removal and all doubts are to be resolved in favor of remand.’” Feuerzeig v. Innovative Communications Corp., 174 F. Supp. 2d 349, 353 (D.V.I. 2001) (quoting Boyer v. Snap–On Tools Corp., 913 F.2d 108, 111 (3d Cir. 1990)).
quoting Boyer v. Snap–On Tools Corp., 913 F.2d 108, 111 (3d Cir. 1990)
green Rich v. O'Brien's USVI, LLC (2021)
Rule Authority · D.V.I.
Page 4 of 9 “Federal removal statutes ‘are to be strictly construed against removal and all doubts are to be resolved in favor of remand.’” Fuerzeig v. Innovative Commc’n Corp., 174 F. Supp. 2d 349, 353 (D.V.I. 2001) (quoting Boyer v. Snap–On Tools Corp., 913 F.2d 108, 111 (3d Cir. 1990)).
quoting Boyer v. Snap–On Tools Corp., 913 F.2d 108, 111 (3d Cir. 1990)
green Todd v. Blake (2018)
Rule Authority · D.V.I.
“Federal removal statutes ‘are to be strictly construed against removal and all doubts are to be resolved in favor of remand.’” Fuerzeig v. Innovative Commc’n Corp., 174 F. Supp. 2d 349, 353 (D.V.I. 2001) (quoting Boyer v. Snap–On Tools Corp., 913 F.2d 108, 111 (3d Cir.1990)).
quoting Boyer v. Snap–On Tools Corp., 913 F.2d 108, 111 (3d Cir.1990)