Culbertson v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SALT LAKE COUNTY (2001)
green
· 112 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200120132026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Brigham Young University v. Tremco Consultants, Inc. (2005)
Corp. (In re General Determination of the Rights to the Use of All the Water), 1999 UT 39, ¶ 15 , 982 P.2d 65 ; see also Culbertson v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, 2001 UT 108 , ¶ 12, 44 P.3d 642 (“The doctrine of res judicata describes the binding effect of a previous adjudication' on a current adjudication.”). “[R]es judicata has two branches: claim preclusion and issue preclusion.” Murdock, 1999 UT 39 at ¶ 15 , 982 P.2d 65 . ¶26 “In general terms, claim preclusion bars a party …
green
Hi-Country Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. Bagley & Co. (2011)
Comm'rs, 2001 UT 108 , ¶ 15, 44 P.3d 642 ("We construe an ambiguous order under the rules that apply to other legal documents."); Utah Valley Bank v. Tanner, 636 P.2d 1060, 1061-62 (Utah 1981) ("Each contract provision is to be considered in relation to all of the others, with a view toward giving effect to all and ignoring none.").
"Each contract provision is to be considered in relation to all of the others, with a view toward giving effect to all and ignoring none."
green
Salt Lake Tribune Publishing Co. v. AT & T Corp. (2003)
"The doctrine of ejusdem generis applies in instances where an inexhaustive enumeration of particular or specific terms is followed by a general term or terms that suggest a class." A.T., 34 P.3d at 232 ; see also Culbertson v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 44 P.3d 642 , 656 (Utah 2001) (stating that the principle of ejusdem generis applies "where an enumeration of particular or specific terms is followed by a general term").
stating that the principle of ejusdem generis applies "where an enumeration of particular or specific terms is followed by a general term"
green
Culbertson v. Board of County Commissioners (2008)
See Culbertson v. Board of County Comm’rs, 2001 UT 108 , 44 P.3d 642 (Culbertson I); Johnson v. Hermes Assocs., Ltd., 2005 UT 82 , 128 P.3d 1151 (Culbertson II).
green
Johnson v. Hermes Associates, Ltd. (2005)
See Culbertson I, 2001 UT 108, ¶ 54 , 44 P.3d 642 ; Utah County v. Baxter, 635 P.2d 61, 64-65 (Utah 1981); 42 Am.Jur.2d Injunctions § 33 (2004).
green
Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co. (2002)
Third, the first suit must have resulted in a final judgment on the merits." Id. (emphasis added) (quoting Madsen v. Borthick, 769 P.2d 245, 247 (Utah 1988)); see also Culbertson, 2001 UT 108 at ¶ 13, 44 P.3d 642 .
green
State v. Jones (2004)
See Culbertson v. Board of County Com’rs of Salt Lake County, 44 P.3d 642, 648 (Utah 2001) (opining that “[wjhere construction is called for, it is the duty of the court to interpret an ambiguity [in a manner that makes] the judgment more reasonable, effective, conclusive and [that] brings the judgment into harmony with the facts and the law.” (Citation omitted.)).
opining that “[wjhere construction is called for, it is the duty of the court to interpret an ambiguity [in a manner that makes] the judgment more reasonable, effective, conclusive and [that] brings the judgment into harmony with the facts and the law.” (Citation omitted.)