Johnson v. State (2011)

green · 65 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 20 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Yellow 1 Green 19

Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

201020182026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

yellow Joshua Davis v. State of Florida (2022)

But See · Fla. · signal: but see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Czubak v. State, 570 So. 2d 925, 928 (Fla. 1990) (finding harmful error where evidence of collateral crimes committed by the defendant—in the form of testimony that defendant was an escaped convict—was introduced, since the testimony had no relevance to any material fact in issue and the case against the defendant was largely circumstantial); but see Castro v. State, 547 So. 2d 111, 115 (Fla. 1989) (deeming a trial court’s error in allowing a witness to testify about the…

green GLENROY ANDERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2017)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

“The test for harmless error focuses on the effect of the error on the trier of fact.” Johnson v. State, 53 So. 3d 1003, 1007 (Fla. 2010).

green Shavers v. State (2012)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Under Florida’s harmless error test, the State bears the burden of establishing “beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the outcome.” Johnson v. State, 53 So.3d 1003, 1007 (Fla.2010) (citing State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129, 1139 (Fla.1986)).

green Cordell v. State of Florida (2026)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Jury instructions are subject to the test for harmless error, which requires appellate courts to determine "whether there is a reasonable possibility that the error affected the verdict." See Johnson v. State, 53 So. 3d 1003, 1007 (Fla. 2010) (quoting State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129, 1139 (Fla. 1986)).

quoting State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129, 1139 (Fla. 1986)

green Scott McDermott v. State of Florida (2024)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

According to the Florida Supreme Court, a trial court commits per se error when it erroneously instructs a jury prior to deliberations that it cannot have any testimony read back, “because it is impossible to determine the effect of the erroneous instruction on the jury without engaging in speculation, and thus a reviewing court is unable to conduct a harmless error analysis.” Johnson v. State, 53 So. 3d 1003, 1005 (Fla. 2010).

green Reynaldo Figueroa-Sanabria v. State of Florida (2023)

Rule Authority · Fla.

If an issue is preserved, we apply either the harmless error test or per se reversible error rule,19 Johnson v. State, 53 So. 3d 1003, 1007 (Fla. 19.

green Lewis v. State (2017)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

The compelling dissenting opinions of Justice Shaw in Wimberly, 498 So.2d at 932 , and Wilcott, 509 So.2d at 263 ; the dissenting opinion of Justice Canady in Haygood v. State, 109 So.3d 735, 746 (Fla. 2013); the concurring, in part, and dissenting, in part, opinion of Justice Polston in Johnson v. State, 53 So.3d 1003, 1013-16 (Fla. 2010); and the concurring opinion in Riley v. State, 25 So.3d 1, 4-6 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008), illustrate the practical calamities resulting from th…

green Horne v. State (2013)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Johnson v. State, 53 So.3d 1003, 1007 (Fla.2010).

green In re Standard Jury Instructions—Contract & Business Cases (2013)

Rule Authority · Fla.

First, the modification reflects the Court’s decision in Johnson v. State, 53 So.3d 1003, 1011 (Fla.2010), holding that, when preserved, it is per se reversible error for a trial judge to inform the jury that they are prohibited from requesting a read-back of testimony.

green Barnes v. State (2013)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

“The test for harmless error focuses on the effect of the error on the trier of fact.” Johnson v. State, 53 So.3d 1003, 1007 (Fla.2010).

green Darious Wilcox v. State of Florida & Darious Wilcox v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (2026)

Cited · Fla. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Johnson v. State, 53 So. 3d 1003, 1007 (Fla. 2010).

green Frank Special v. West Boca Medical Center (2014)

Cited · Fla. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Johnson v. State, 53 So.3d 1003, 1007 (Fla.2010) (emphasis added) (“The test for harmless error focuses on the effect of the error on the trier of fact.”); Burns v. State, 699 So.2d 646, 652 (Fla.1997) (noting that reversal is required if the error contributed to the jury’s recommendation or the error contributed to the outcome).

green MacKendrick v. State (2013)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Johnson v. State, 53 So.3d 1003 , 1005-06 & n. 3 (Fla.2010); Ventura v. State, 29 So.3d 1086, 1089-90 (Fla.2010).

green Rodney Robinson v. State of Florida (2025)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see also

See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 1986); see also Johnson v. State, 53 So. 3d 1003, 1011 (Fla. 2011) (observing: “The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that even constitutional errors are ordinarily subject to harmless-error analysis.”); Corona v. State, 64 So. 3d 1232, 1241 (Fla. 2011) (reaffirming that “[v]iolations of the Confrontation Clause, where preserved, are subject to harmless error analysis.”) (citing State v. Contreras, 979 So. 2d 8…

observing: “The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly recognized that even constitutional errors are ordinarily subject to harmless-error analysis.”

green Wileme Baptiste v. State of Florida (2021)

Cited · Fla. · signal: see

See Johnson v. State, 53 So. 3d 1003 , 1007 & n.5 (Fla. 2010). -7- consistent with this opinion and disapprove the Fourth District’s decision in Rubi.

green Smith v. State (2018)