State v. Goodwin (2010)

green · 12 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 7

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green R.F., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (2020)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

State v. Goodwin, 36 So. 3d 925, 926 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

green Smith v. State (2012)

Quote Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

Id.; see also Caldwell v. State, 41 So.3d 188, 195 (Fla.2010); State v. Goodwin, 36 So.3d 925, 926 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“[T]he mere questioning of an individual, including a police request for identification, does not amount to a Fourth Amendment detention.”) (quoting State v. Dixon, 976 So.2d 1206, 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (emphasis in original)); Brevick v. State, 965 So.2d 1246, 1249 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (“A detention does not occur simply because an officer approaches and…

“[T]he mere questioning of an individual, including a police request for identification, does not amount to a Fourth Amendment detention.”

green Larry Darnell Young v. State of Florida (2024)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

Analysis Standard of Review “[T]he standard of review applicable to a motion to suppress evidence requires that this Court defer to the trial court’s factual findings but review legal conclusions de novo.” Bryan v. State, 62 So. 3d 1244, 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011) (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Goodwin, 36 So. 3d 925, 926 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)).

green State v. Page (2011)

Quote Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

See O.A. v. State, 754 So.2d 717 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); State v. Goodwin, 36 So.3d 925, 926 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (“[t]he mere questioning of an individual, including a police request for identification, does not amount to a Fourth Amendment detention”) (citation omitted).

“[t]he mere questioning of an individual, including a police request for identification, does not amount to a Fourth Amendment detention”

green Bryan v. State (2011)

Rule Authority · Fla. Dist. Ct. App.

This appeal followed. “[T]he standard of review applicable to a motion to suppress evidence requires that this Court defer to the trial court’s factual findings but review legal conclusions de novo.” State v. Goodwin, 36 So.3d 925, 926 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); State v. Abbey, 28 So.3d 208, 210 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).

green Smith v. State (2012)

Cited · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see

See State v. Goodwin, 36 So.3d 925, 927 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (holding that the officer’s mere use of her spotlight and flashlight did not transform the consensual encounter into an investigatory stop).

holding that the officer’s mere use of her spotlight and flashlight did not transform the consensual encounter into an investigatory stop

green Robinson v. State (2011)

Cited (see also) · Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., State v. Goodwin, 36 So.3d 925, 927 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010); State v. Elbertson, 340 So.2d 1250, 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).