How cited: Cluster 258481 · Go Syfert

Cluster 258481 (1962)

green · 43 citation events across 25 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196219942026
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
See Belluso v. Turner Communications Corp., 633 F.2d at 395 (private broadcaster; no private cause of action under § 315(a)); Daly v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 309 F.2d 83, 86 (7th Cir.1962) (private broadcaster; no private cause of action under § 315(a)); cf. Lechtner v. Brownyard, 679 F.2d at 326-27 (no private right of action for violation of FCC “personal attack” rule); Schnapper v. Foley, 215 U.S.App.D.C. 59 , 667 F.2d 102, 116 (1981) (no private right of acti…
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
See Schnapper v. Foley, 667 F.2d 102, 116 (D.C.Cir.1981), ce rt. denied,-U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 1448 , 71 L.Ed.2d 661 (1982) (no private right of action under Public Broadcasting and Communications Acts because the courts “may not determine the disposition of controversies that Congress has committed to the discretion of the F.C.C.”); see also, Belluso v. Turner Communications Corp., 633 F.2d 393, 397 (5th Cir. 1980) (no private right of action may be implied under the fairness do…
no private cause of action under § 315(a) of the Act providing for equal time for political candidates
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
As this court stated in Daly v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 309 F.2d 83, 86 (7th Cir. 1962): 11 Illinois cases demonstrate that if an individual is subjected to civil liability for the violation of a regulatory statute for the general protection of the public, such liability is penal in nature and barred by the two-year statute of limitations.
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
As this court stated in Daly v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 309 F.2d 83, 86 (7th Cir. 1962): Illinois cases demonstrate that if an individual is subjected to civil liability for the violation of a regulatory statute for the general protection of the public, such liability is penal in nature and barred by the two-year statute of limitations. [Citations omitted.] Furthermore, the relief requested here is a forfeiture of Mid-America’s right to recover most of the money …
Quote Authority · D. Maryland
Sys., Inc., 309 F.2d 83 , 85 (7th Cir. 1962) (“There is no provision in [§] 315(a), or in any other part of the Act, which gives a private individual a cause of action to recover damages for an alleged violation of the Act.”); Harrison-Halsted Cmty. Grp., Inc. v. Hous. and Home Fin.
“There is no provision in [§] 315(a), or in any other part of the Act, which gives a private individual a cause of action to recover damages for an alleged violation of the Act.”
Rule Authority · E.D. Ark.
Belluso v. Turner Communications Corp., 633 F.2d 393, 397-97 (5th Cir.1980); Daly v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 309 F.2d 83, 85 (7th Cir.1962); Gordon v. National Broadcasting Company, 287 F.Supp. 452, 455 (S.D.N.Y.1968).
Rule Authority · D.V.I.
Belluso v. Turner Communications Corp., 633 F.2d 393, 395-97 (5th Cir. 1980); Daly v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 309 F.2d 83, 85 (7th Cir. 1962); Gordon v. National Broadcasting Company, 287 F.Supp. 452, 455 (S.D.
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
C. 316 U.S. 4, 14 , 62 S.Ct. 875 , 86 L.Ed. 1229 (1942); Massachusetts Universalist Convention v. Hildreth, supra; Daly v. West Central Broadcasting Co., 309 F.2d 83, 85 (7th Cir. 1962); Gordon v. National Broadcasting Co., 287 F.Supp. at 455 .
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
C., 316 U.S. 4, 14 , 62 S.Ct. 875 , 86 L.Ed. 1229 (1942); Massachusetts Universalist Convention v. Hildreth, supra; Daly v. West Central Broadcasting Co., 309 F.2d 83, 85 (7th Cir. 1962); Gordon v. National Broadcasting Co., 287 F.Supp. at 455 .
Rule Authority · C.D. Cal.
Daly v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 309 F.2d 83, 86 (7th Cir. 1962); Massachusetts Universalist Convention v. Hildreth & Rogers Co., 183 F.2d 497, 500 (1st Cir. 1950); McIntire v. Wm.
green Post v. Payton (1971)
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
It is clear that the Act created no new private rights nor afforded persons in plaintiffs’ position a right to institute an action in the district courts (Scripps-Howard Radio v. Federal Communications Commission, 316 U.S. 4, 14 , 62 S.Ct. 875 , 86 L.Ed. 1229 (1942); Ackerman v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., supra; Daly v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 309 F.2d 83, 86 (7th Cir. 1962)), the Commission being charged with its enforcement and providing the exclusive …
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see
See Daly v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 309 F.2d 83 (7th Cir. 1962); Smothers v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 351 F.Supp. 622 (D.C.Cal.1972); Ackerman v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 301 F.Supp. 628 (S.D.N.Y.1969); Gordon v. National Broadcasting Co., 287 F.Supp. 452 (S.D.N.Y.1968); but compare Reitmeister v. Reitmeister, 162 F.2d 691 (2d Cir. 1947) (implying a private cause of action for unauthorized publication of a telephone conversation in violation…
Cited · D. Conn. · signal: see
See Daly v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 309 F.2d 83, 85 (7th Cir. 1962); Gordon v. NBC, 287 F.Supp. 452 (S.D.N.Y.1968). 6 .