Cluster 260062 (1963)
green
· 61 citation events
across 34 courts.
Showing the 21 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196319942026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
In Re Franciscan Vineyards, Inc., Bankrupt. County of Napa v. Franciscan Vineyards, Inc., Appeal of William B… (1979)
Orcutt Co. v. Green, 204 U.S. 96, 101 , 27 S.Ct. 195 , 51 L.Ed. 390 (1907); In re Gibraltor Amusements Ltd., 315 F.2d 210, 213 (2d Cir. 1963); In re Patterson-MacDonald Shipbldg.
FNBL concedes that its August 18, 1980 letter was not filed with the bankruptcy court within the six month period, but relies on a line of cases holding that delivery of a “claim” 12 to the trustee is a sufficient “filing.” See County of Napa v. Franciscan Vineyards, Inc., 597 F.2d 181, 183 (9th Cir.1979) (per curiam) (In re Franciscan Vineyards, Inc.), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 915 , 100 S.Ct. 1274 , 63 L.Ed.2d 598 (1980); National Bank v. Wurlitzer Co., 315 F.2d 210, 213 (2d …
green
In Re Benedict (1986)
In re Thompson, 227 F. 981, 983 (3d Cir.1915); In re Gibraltor Amusements Ltd., 315 F.2d 210, 215 (2d Cir.1963); accord In re Lipman, supra at 368.
green
In Re Alsted Automotive Warehouse, Inc. (1982)
“It has long been the law that the bankruptcy court possesses the power to allow the amendment of a defectively filed proof of claim, even after the expiration of the time designated by the statute for the filing of claims.” In re Gibraltar Amusements LTD., 315 F.2d 210, 213 (2d Cir. 1963) citing Hutchinson v. Otis, Wilcox, & Company, 190 U.S. 552 , 23 S.Ct. 778 , 47 L.Ed. 1179 (1903).
green
In Re Rockville Orthopedic Associates, P.C. (2007)
ERN cites In re Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd., 315 F.2d 210, 216 (2d Cir.1963) (“But the most astonishing part of the whole case is the contention of appel-lees that the equities of the situation require a denial of the Bank’s petition for leave to amend its claim.
As the court held in In re Sullivan, 36 B.R. 771, 773 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1984), quoting, In re Lipman, 65 F.2d 366, 368 (2d Cir.1933), “it is not essential that a document be styled a ‘proof of claim,’ or that it be filed in the form of a claim, if it fulfills the purposes for which the filing of proof is required.” See also In re Alsted Automotive Warehouse, 16 B.R. 924, 925 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1982) citing In re Gibraltar Amusements, Ltd., 315 F.2d 210, 213 (2d Cir.1963) citing Hut…
green
In Re McCoy Management Services, Inc. (1984)
Hutchinson v. Otis, 190 U.S. 552, 555 , 23 S.Ct. 778, 779 , 47 L.Ed. 1179 (1903); Sun Basin Lumber Co. v. United States, 432 F.2d 48, 49 (9th Cir.1970); In re Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd., 315 F.2d 210, 213 (2d Cir.1963); In re Faulkner, 161 F. 900 (8th Cir.1908).
green
Lazar v. Sullivan (1984)
“Whether formal or informal, a claim must show ... that a demand is made against the estate, and must show the creditor’s intention to hold the estate liable.” In re Thompson, 227 F. 981, 983 (3d Cir.1915); In re Gibraltor Amusements Ltd., 315 F.2d 210 at 215 (2nd Cir.1963); accord 65 F.2d at 368 .
green
Associated Container Transportation (Australia) Ltd. v. Black & Geddes, Inc. (In Re Black & Geddes, Inc.) (1983)
In re Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd., 315 F.2d 210, 213 (2d Cir.1963), citing Hutchinson v. Otis, Wilcox & Co., 190 U.S. 552 , 23 S.Ct. 778 , 47 L.Ed. 1179 (1903).
green
In Re Greene (1983)
Indeed, it is well settled that requests to amend formerly filed, but imperfect, proofs of claim are to be treated liberally, Perry v. Certificate Holders of Thrift Savings, 320 F.2d 584, 590 (9th Cir. 1963); National Bank of Westchester v. Wurlitzer Co. (In re Gibraltor Amusements Ltd.), 315 F.2d 210, 214 (2nd Cir.1963); In re Vega Baja Lumber Yard, Inc., 285 F.Supp. 143, 145 (D.P.R.1968), and that the filing of an amended proof of claim after the expiration of the stipulat…
green
In Re Sems Music Co., Inc. (1982)
Hutchinson v. Otis, 190 U.S. 552, 555 , 23 S.Ct. 778, 779 , 47 L.Ed. 1179 (1902); In re Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd., 315 F.2d 210, 213 (2d Cir.1963).
green
Guardian Mortgage Investors v. Sunset Villas Phase III Condominium Ass'n (In Re Guardian Mortgage Investors) (1981)
In re the Matter of Gibraltor Amusements Ltd., 315 F.2d 210, 213 (2d Cir. 1963).
green
Matter of Neisner Bros., Inc. (1979)
This power exists “only if the defectively filed proof of claim was ‘sufficient’ to constitute a basis for amendment,” with the principal limitation being “that a new cause of action could not be alleged in the amended proof of claim.” In Re Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd., 315 F.2d 210, 213 (2d Cir. 1963).
green
In Re Anjopa Paper & Board Manufacturing Co. (1967)
In re Gibraltor Amusements Ltd., 315 F.2d 210, 216 (2d Cir. 1963), and its jurisdiction is exclusive.
green
In Re Southold Development Corp. (1994)
Informal proofs of claim may be subject to amendment subsequent to the bar date (id. at 421; see also In re Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd., 315 F.2d 210 [2d Cir.1963]; In re Lipman, 65 F.2d 366 [2d Cir.1933]).
green
In Re Osborne (1993)
See also In re Overly-Hautz Company, 57 B.R. 932, 936 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1986) (court must balance equities to determine appropriateness of an amendment) (citing In re Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd., 315 F.2d 210 (2d Cir.1963)).
green
In Re J. Bildner & Sons, Inc. (1989)
See also In re Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd., 315 F.2d 210 (2d Cir.1963).
green
In Re Butterworth (1984)
See, In re Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd., 315 F.2d 210 (CA 2 1963); Hoos & Co. v. Dynamics Corp. of America, 570 F.2d 433 (CA 2 1978); In re Alsted Automotive Warehouse, Inc., 16 B.R. 924 (Bkrtcy.E.D.N.Y. 1982).
green
In Re Evanston Motor Co., Inc. (1982)
See In re Gibraltor Amusements, Ltd., 315 F.2d 210 (2d Cir. 1963); In re Lipman, 65 F.2d 366 (2d Cir. 1933); In re Kessler, 184 F. 51 (2d Cir. 1910).
green
Matter of Paul R. Dean Co., Inc. (1978)
See, e. g., *450 In re Gibraltor Amusements Ltd., 315 F.2d 210 (1963); In re Lipman, 65 F.2d 366 (1933); In re Kessler, 184 F. 51 (1910).
green
Matter of American Beef Packers, Inc. (1977)
See also In Re Gibraltor Amusements Ltd., 315 F.2d 210 (2nd Cir. 1963).