How cited: State v. Mandanas · Go Syfert

State v. Mandanas (2010)

green · 27 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201020182026
Cited · Wash. Ct. App. · signal: see
See State v. Mandanas, 168 Wn.2d 84, 88 , 228 P.3d 13 (2010) (holding that courts must impose multiple firearm enhancements even where the underlying crimes constitute the same criminal conduct); Kelly, 4 Wn.3d at 192-94 (holding that courts must impose multiple firearm enhancements consecutively).
holding that courts must impose multiple firearm enhancements even where the underlying crimes constitute the same criminal conduct
Cited · D. Ariz. · signal: see
See State v. Henry, 228 P.3d 13 900, 903, 905 (Ariz. App. 2010).
Cited (see also) · Wash. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., State v. Kelly, 4 Wn.3d 170, 191, 195 , 561 P.3d 246 (2024) (considering whether multiple enhancements can run concurrently), State v. Mandanas, 168 Wn.2d 84 , 228 P.3d 13 (2010) (addressing the imposition of multiple enhancements for multiple enhancement-eligible offenses that amount to the same criminal conduct), and State v. DeSantiago, 149 Wn.2d 402, 417, 421 , 68 P.3d 1065 (2003) (considering whether a trial court must impose multiple enhancements to a standa…
addressing the imposition of multiple enhancements for multiple enhancement-eligible offenses that amount to the same criminal conduct
green Anguiano v. Holbrook (2020)
Cited · E.D. Wash. · signal: see
See Mandanas, 228 P.3d at 15–16; Brimmage, 793 F.2d at 1015 . 15 The jury found Petitioner and his companions wielded a total of three 16 firearms in the commission of two enhancement-eligible offenses.
Cited (see also) · Wash. Ct. App. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., State v. Mandanas, 168 Wn.2d 84, 89 , 228 P.3d 13 (2010).