State v. SH (1994)
green
· 138 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 11 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
199420102026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Personal Restraint Petition of M.T.M.L (2025)
State v. S.H., 75 Wn.
green
State v. J.V. (2006)
S.H., 75 Wn.
“Responding to a need for treatment is an appropriate basis for a manifest injustice disposition and is determined by the specific needs of the particular defendant.”
green
State v. T.E.C. (2004)
“An aggravating factor is legally adequate to justify a sentence outside of the standard range as long as the aggravating factor was not necessarily considered by the Legislature in establishing the standard range, and as long as the asserted aggravating factor is ‘sufficiently substantial and compelling to distinguish the crime in question from others in the same category.’ ” S.H., 75 Wn.
citations omitted
green
State v. Beaver (2002)
See State v. S.H., 75 Wn.
“This section [RCW 13.40.210(1)] by its own terms does not apply to manifest injustice dispositions.”
green
State v. Beaver (2002)
REPORT, 45th Wash. Leg., Reg. Sess. at 39. [13] See State v. S.H., 75 Wash.App. 1, 15 , 877 P.2d 205 (1994) ("This section [RCW 13.40.210(1) ] by its own terms does not apply to manifest injustice dispositions.").
"This section [RCW 13.40.210(1) ] by its own terms does not apply to manifest injustice dispositions."
green
State v. B.O.J. (2019)
Report at \ \\see S.H., 75 Wn.
a high risk to reoffend and the need for treatment are valid grounds for a manifest injustice disposition
green
State v. TEC (2004)
"Protection of society from dangerous juvenile offenders is an appropriate basis for a disposition outside the standard range." S.H., 75 Wash.App. at 12, n. 4 , 877 P.2d 205 .
green
State v. JV (2006)
See also State v. Duncan, 90 Wash.App. 808, 812 , 960 P.2d 941 (1998) ("purposes [of JJA] include protection of the citizenry and provision of necessary treatment, supervision and custody for juvenile offenders"). [15] S.H., 75 Wash.App. at 12 , 877 P.2d 205 ("Responding to a need for treatment is an appropriate basis for a manifest injustice disposition and is determined by the specific needs of the particular defendant."); State v. Tauala, 54 Wash.App. 81, 87 , 771 P.2d 11…
green
State v. TEH (1998)
See also State v. Gutierrez, 37 Wash.App. 910 , 684 P.2d 87 (1984). [17] State v. S.H., 75 Wash.App. 1, 11 , 877 P.2d 205 (1994) (citing J.N., 64 Wash.App. at 114 , 823 P.2d 1128 ). [18] State v. S.S., 67 Wash.App. 800, 817 , 840 P.2d 891 (1992). [19] State v. M.L., 134 Wash.2d at 660, 952 P.2d 187 (1998) ( citing Strong, 23 Wash.App. at 794 , 599 P.2d 20 ). [20] M.L., 134 Wash.2d at 660 , 952 P.2d 187 (citing State v. P., 37 Wash.App. 773, 779 , 686 P.2d 488 (1984); State v…
citing J.N., 64 Wash.App. at 114 , 823 P.2d 1128
green
State v. K.E. (1999)
See, e.g., State v. S.H., 75 Wn.
green
State v. Baird (1996)
See State v. S.H., 75 Wn.