Colonial Tri-City Ltd. Partnership v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc. (1993)

green · 61 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 16 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 16

Treatment trajectory · 1997 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

199720112026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Voliner v. Olson (2024)

Quote Authority · Ariz. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion

Co. v. Camex Prods., Inc., 190 Ariz. 75, 79 (App. 1997) superseded on other grounds by A.R.S. § 33-1315(A)(2)). ¶14 In Colonial Tri-City, this court held that the trial court erred by not dismissing a forcible detainer action because there was a dispute over whether the requisite landlord-tenant relationship existed. 179 Ariz. at 433 (“The issue in a [forcible detainer] proceeding . . . is not whether the parties have created a landlord and tenant relationship but whether an…

“The issue in a [forcible detainer] proceeding . . . is not whether the parties have created a landlord and tenant relationship but whether an already existing lease should be terminated and possession awarded to the landlord because of the tenant’s breach of lease or nonpayment of rent.”

green Rreef Management Co. v. Camex Productions, Inc. (1997)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App. · 3 citations in this opinion

If the latter question is disputed, that dispute must be resolved in a general civil action and not in a summary proceeding under section 33-361. 179 Ariz. at 433 , 880 P.2d at 653 (citations omitted; emphasis added).

citations omitted; emphasis added

green Ncr Investments v. Maxfield (2025)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

P’ship v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 433 (App. 1993).

green Steinfelt v. American Family (2022)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

P’ship v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 433 (App. 1993).

green Johnson v. Earnhardt's Gilbert Dodge, Inc. (2005)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion

P'ship v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 432 , 880 P.2d 648, 652 (App.1993)).

green Quintana v. Urbanek (2026)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

P’ship v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 433 (App. 1993). ¶9 Tenant argues the court erred by treating Owner’s acquisition of the property as a foreclosure and finding her lease was not binding on Owner.

green McGrew v. Brunet (2026)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

P’ship v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 433-34 (App. 1993) (whether the parties have a landlord-tenant relationship cannot be properly determined in a summary proceeding).

whether the parties have a landlord-tenant relationship cannot be properly determined in a summary proceeding

green Mullen v. Mullen (2025)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

P’ship v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 433 (App. 1993) (plaintiff must show existence of a lease). ¶9 The record shows that, when asked why he had failed to pay rent, Travis stated that when he heard Starlie wanted to sell the home, he wanted to buy the home but was told there were issues with the title.

plaintiff must show existence of a lease

green Ely v. Ely (2024)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

P’ship v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 433 (App. 1993). “[N]o counterclaims, offsets or cross complaints are available either as a defense or for affirmative relief in such action.” United Effort Plan Tr. v. Holm, 209 Ariz. 347, 351, ¶ 21 (App. 2004) (cleaned up).

green S S Holdings v. American Green (2022)

Quote Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

P’ship v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 434 (App. 1993) (“[C]laims and counterclaims for damages for breach of a lease . . . are not issues to be determined in a forcible entry and detainer action. . . .

“[C]laims and counterclaims for damages for breach of a lease . . . are not issues to be determined in a forcible entry and detainer action. . . . Those issues are properly resolved in a general civil action.”

green US Bank v. Lietz (2020)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

P’ship v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 433 (App. 1993).

green Deutsche Bank v. Gonzalez (2015)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

P’ship v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 433 , 880 P.2d 648, 653 (App. 1993); Curtis v. Morris, 184 Ariz. 393, 398 , 909 P.2d 460, 465 (App. 1995).

green United Effort Plan Trust v. Holm (2004)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

P’ship v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 434 , 880 P.2d 648, 654 (App.1993) (“[W]hether the parties have created a landlord and tenant relationship is ... not properly determined in a summary proceeding.”).

green Lemons v. Showcase Motors, Inc. (2004)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

P’ship v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 432 , 880 P.2d 648, 652 (App.1993)).

green Tobel v. Travelers Insurance (1999)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Partnership v. Ben Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 432 , 880 P.2d 648, 652 (App.1993).

green Great American Mortgage, Inc. v. Statewide Insurance (1997)

Rule Authority · Ariz. Ct. App.

Partnership v. Ben *125 Franklin Stores, Inc., 179 Ariz. 428, 432 , 880 P.2d 648, 652 (App.1993).