How cited: Powell v. Bunn · Go Syfert

Powell v. Bunn (2002)

green · 86 citation events across 2 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200320142026
green Powell v. Bunn (2005)
Rule Authority · Or. Ct. App. · 5 citations in this opinion
Moreover, as long as the district’s policies remain in place, and as long as the Boy Scouts remains active in other schools within the district, plaintiff is confronted with a classic Hobson’s choice: she must either subject her child to unwelcome and allegedly unconstitutional religious activity or she must restrict her choice of schools for her son to those in which the Boy Scouts declines to recruit. * * * Either choice provides her with a concrete stake in the litigation…
citation omitted
green Vance v. Ford (2003)
Quote Authority · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Powell v. Bunn, 185 Or App 334, 346 , 59 P3d 559 (2002) (“If the court’s decision will not have a practical effect on the plaintiff because the plaintiff cannot demonstrate an injury or other impact on a legally recognized interest, the case will be dismissed based on the plaintiffs lack of standing.”).
“If the court’s decision will not have a practical effect on the plaintiff because the plaintiff cannot demonstrate an injury or other impact on a legally recognized interest, the case will be dismissed based on the plaintiffs lack of standing.”
green State v. Illig-Renn (2003)
Cited · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Powell v. Bunn, 185 Or.App. 334, 357 , 59 P.3d 559 (2002) (following a Supreme Court precedent whose doctrinal underpinnings had been eroded). [6] We accordingly reverse the trial court's order and remand this case for trial.
following a Supreme Court precedent whose doctrinal underpinnings had been eroded
Cited · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion
See Powell, 185 Or App at 346 (“If the court’s decision will not have a practical effect on the plaintiff because the plaintiff cannot demonstrate an injury or other *336 impact on a legally recognized interest, the case will be dismissed based on the plaintiffs lack of standing.”).
Cited · Or. Ct. App. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Powell v. Bunn, 185 Or App 334, 354 , 59 P3d 559 (2002), rev den, 336 Or 60 (2003) (court ordinarily considers statutory claim before proceeding to constitutional challenge).