State v. Bobenhouse (2009)
green
· 106 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 13 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200920172026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
State v. Bobenhouse, 166 Wn.2d 881, 892 , 214 P.3d 907 (2009) (“The review standard for whether the failure to provide an unanimity instruction was error hinges on whether we are dealing with an alternative means case or a multiple acts case.”).
“The review standard for whether the failure to provide an unanimity instruction was error hinges on whether we are dealing with an alternative means case or a multiple acts case.”
green
State of Iowa v. Ajamu Manu El-Amin (2020)
Ct. App. 2017) (affirming conviction on multiple counts of sexual battery for compelling four victims at gunpoint “to perform nonconsensual sexual acts upon each other”); State v. Bobenhouse, 214 P.3d 907, 908, 910 (Wash. 2009) (en banc) (affirming convictions of the defendant who “can be held legally See also State v. Walton, 311 N.W.2d 113, 115 (Iowa 1981) (discussing defenses of necessity and compulsion or duress). 13 accountable for child molestation based on causing con…
en banc
green
State of Arizona v. Penny Ann West (2015)
See State v. Hooker, 21 P.3d 964, 968 (Kan. 2001) (“Our analysis of the instructions and charges leads to the conclusion that this was an alternative means case, not a multiple acts case, and, thus, no unanimity instruction was required.”); State v. Gardner, 889 N.E.2d 995 , 1005 (Ohio 2008) (“[T]he critical inquiry is whether the case involves ‘alternative means’ or ‘multiple acts.’”); State v. Bobenhouse, 214 P.3d 907, 911 (Wash. 2009) (“The review standard for whether the…
“The review standard for whether the failure to provide a unanimity instruction was error hinges on whether we are dealing with an alternative means case or a multiple acts case.”
green
State of Arizona v. Penny Ann West (2015)
See State v. Hooker, 271 Kan. 52 , 21 P.3d 964, 968 (2001) (“Our analysis of the instructions and charges leads to the conclusion that this was an alternative means ease, not a multiple acts case, and, thus, no unanimity instruction was required.”); State v. Gardner, 118 Ohio St.3d 420 , 889 N.E.2d 995 ,1005 (2008) (“[T]he critical inquiry is whether the case involves ‘alternative means’ or ‘multiple acts.’”); State v. Bobenhouse, 166 Wash.2d 881 , 214 P.3d 907, 911 (2009) (…
“The review standard for whether the failure to provide a unanimity instruction was error hinges on whether we are dealing with an alternative means case or a multiple acts ease.”
See, e.g., State v. Bobenhouse, 166 Wn.2d 881, 889 , 214 P.3d 907 (2009).
green
State Of Washington v. Oleg Denis Kornuta (2018)
See, e.g., State v. Bobenhouse, 166 Wn.2d 881, 891-95 , 214 P.3d 907 (2009).
green
State Of Washington v. Michael Anthony Santos (2018)
See also State v. Bobenhouse, 166 Wn.2d 881, 896 , 214 P.3d 907 (2009).
green
State v. Coristine (2013)
See, e.g., State v. Bobenhouse, 166 Wn.2d 881, 894 , 214 P.3d 907 (2009).
green
State v. Coristine (2013)
See, e.g., State v. Bobenhouse, 166 Wn.2d 881, 894 , 214 P.3d 907 (2009).
green
State v. Graciano (2013)
See State v. Bobenhouse, 166 Wn.2d 881, 896 , 214 P.3d 907 (2009).
green
State v. Mutch (2011)
See State v. Bobenhouse, 166 Wash.2d 881, 894-95 , 214 P.3d 907 (2009) (finding harmless error where there was no unanimity instruction but detailed, uncontradicted testimony of each alleged crime and observing that "if the jury reasonably believed one incident occurred, all the incidents must have occurred"). [5] In Berg, the Court of Appeals vacated one of two identically charged counts of child molestation. 147 Wash.App. at 935 , 198 P.3d 529 .
finding harmless error where there was no unanimity instruction but detailed, uncontradicted testimony of each alleged crime and observing that "if the jury reasonably believed one incident occurred, all the incidents must have occurred"
green
State v. Mutch (2011)
See State v. Bobenhouse, 166 Wn.2d 881, 894-95 , 214 P.3d 907 (2009) (finding harmless error where there was no unanimity instruction but detailed, uncontradicted testimony of each alleged crime and observing that “if the jury reasonably believed one incident occurred, all the incidents must have occurred”).
finding harmless error where there was no unanimity instruction but detailed, uncontradicted testimony of each alleged crime and observing that “if the jury reasonably believed one incident occurred, all the incidents must have occurred”
green
State v. McDaniel (2010)
See State v. Bobenhouse, 143 Wash.App. 315, 322-24 , 177 P.3d 209 (2008), aff'd, 166 Wash.2d 881 , 214 P.3d 907 (2009). [29] Detective Miller testified at the pretrial hearing regarding exclusion of testimony about "Tony Guns's" and "Reese's" true names.