How cited: American Dredging Company v. Local 25 · Go Syfert

American Dredging Company v. Local 25 (1964)

green · 67 citation events across 29 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196419952026
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
The Supreme Court itself has time and again paid homage to the doctrine of the separation of powers decreed by the Constitution and declared that judicial legislation is abhorrent to, and in violation of, the Constitutional scheme.' American Dredging Company v. Local 25, Marine Division, International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO, 338 F.2d 837, 850 (3 Cir. 1964), cert. den. 380 U.S. 935 , 85 S.Ct. 941 , 13 L.Ed.2d 822 (1965). 47 As earlier stated, this Court, time a…
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
The district court may need to address such matters on remand. 16 38 We specifically reserve, and express no opinion on, these issues, which may have to be considered by the district court after examination of the authorities, including legislative history of § 15 ( 33 U.S.C. § 409 ): 39 (1) Does § 15 ( 33 U.S.C. § 409 ) authorize, at a negligent vessel owner's expense, the employment of a helper boat or other aids to navigation, in addition to the removal of the obstruction…
green Polite v. Diehl (1974)
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
Judicial legislation contravenes Article I, § 1 of the Constitution which reserved to the Congress the power to legislate, American Dredging Co. v. Local 25, AFL—CIO, 338 F.2d 837, 850 (3d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 935 , 85 S.Ct. 941 , 13 L.Ed.2d 822 (1965).
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
American Dredging Co. v. Local 25, AFL-CIO, 338 F.2d 837, 850 (3d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 935 , 85 S.Ct. 941 , 13 L.Ed.2d 822 (1965). 185 Johnson v. Glick, supra, affords a striking instance of judicial amendment of the due process clause and sequential judicial legislation with respect to 1983. 186 There, the Court, in implicit recognition of the fact that the Bill of Rights (including the due process clause) does not provide a guarantee against assaults, per se,…
Rule Authority · virginislands
Dredging Co. v. Local 25, Marine Div., int'l Union of Operating Eng'rs, 338 F.2d 837, 842-43 (3d Cir. 1964))); see V.L.
Cited (see also) · SCOTUS · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e. g., American Dredging Co. v. Marine Local 25, 338 F. 2d 837 (C.
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See note 2, supra. 18 Without considering whether a disjunctive construction of Sec. 1447(c) is warranted, we cannot agree that the reason assigned for the remand order here--the restriction on the federal remedy--is a ground authorized for remand by the statute.
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See note 2, supra. Without considering whether a disjunctive construction of § 1447(c) is warranted, we cannot agree that the reason assigned for the remand order here — the restriction on the federal remedy — is a ground authorized for remand by the statute.
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Ohio Barge Lines, Inc., etc. et al., supra note 1, Civil No. 75-783, W.D.
Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: compare
Compare the Sixth Circuit’s opinion in Avco, 376 F.2d 337 (1967) with that of the Third Circuit in American Dredging Co. v. Local 25, 338 F.2d 837 (1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 935 , 85 S.Ct. 941 , 13 L.Ed.2d 822 (1965). 16 .
No. 116
green Haynes v. Ottley (2014)
Cited (see also) · virginislands · signal: see also
Peters v. People, 60 V.I. 479, 483 (V.I. 2014) (quoting Brady v. Gov’t of the V.I., 57 V.I. 433, 442-43 (V.I. 2012)); see also Gilbert, 52 V.I. at 357 (citing American Dredging Co. v. Local 25, Marine Division, Int’l Union of Operating Engineers, 338 F.2d 837 , 842-43 (3d Cir. 1964)).
Cited · La. Ct. App. · signal: see
See American Dredging Co. v. Local 25, Marine Division etc., 338 F.2d 837 (3d Cir., 1964).
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also
See also the dissenting opinions of Hastie, J., in American Dredging Co. v. Local 25, Marine Div., Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs, 338 F.2d 837, 857-858 (3d Cir. 1964) and Carter, J., in McCarroll v. Los Angeles County Dist.