How cited: National Mining Association v. Jackson · Go Syfert

National Mining Association v. Jackson (2012)

green · 14 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · S.D.W. Va · 2 citations in this opinion
Effectively creating a conductivity water quality effluent limit Defendants argue that this Court cannot rule in Plaintiffs’ favor because doing so would effectively create a conductivity water quality effluent limit — precisely the action which a federal district court, in National Mining Association v. Jackson, 880 F.Supp.2d 119, 137-38 (D.D.C.2012), ruled to be beyond the authority of the EPA, despite the EPA’s otherwise broad powers under the CWA.
Rule Authority · W. Va. · 2 citations in this opinion
(The EPA guidance, described in the body of this decision, sets a numeric limit on conductivity at 500 microsiemens/cm; however, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia found that this standard “removes the reasonable potential analysis from the realm of state regulators.” National Mining Association v. Jackson, 880 F.Supp.2d 119, 141 (D.C.
Rule Authority · S.D.W. Va
In Elk Run, Defendants argued that liability based on conductivity levels would effectively create a water qualify effluent limit, which according to a federal district court in Nat’l Mining Ass’n v. Jackson, 880 F.Supp.2d 119, 137-42 (D.D.C.2012), exceeded EPA authority.