How cited: State v. Carrick · Go Syfert

State v. Carrick (2012)

green · 62 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 2 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201320192026
green State v. Jeffers (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
“Accordingly, ‘a court should not give an instruction unless it is specifically applicable to the facts in the case.’ ” Id., quoting State v. Fritz, 2005-Ohio- 4723, ¶ 19 (2d Dist.), citing State v. Guster, 66 Ohio St.2d 266 (1981). “ ‘A trial court has discretion to determine whether the evidence adduced at trial was sufficient to warrant an instruction.’ ” Id., quoting State v. Austin, 2018-Ohio-3048, ¶ 54 (8th Dist.), citing State v. Fulmer, 2008-Ohio-936 , ¶ 72. “ ‘In re…
green State v. Wheatley (2018)
Cited · Oh. Ct. App. 4th Dist. Hocking · signal: accord · 2 citations in this opinion
Partnership , 123 Ohio St.3d 278 , 2009-Ohio-5030 , 915 N.E.2d 1205 , ¶ 13 ("for a statute to be facially unconstitutional, it must be unconstitutional in all applications"); Harrold at ¶ 37 ; accord United States v. Salerno , 481 U.S. 739 , 745, 107 S.Ct. 2095 , 95 L.Ed.2d 697 (1987) (explaining that law facially unconstitutional if "no set of circumstances exists under which the [law] would be valid"). "[A] facial challenge permits a statute to be attacked for its effect o…