How cited: Anthimos Gogos v. AMS-Mechanical System, Incorpo · Go Syfert

Anthimos Gogos v. AMS-Mechanical System, Incorpo (2013)

green · 128 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201420202026
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1173 (7th Cir. 2013). 9 J.A. 20. 10 See e.g., Eshelman v. Agere Sys., Inc., 554 F.3d 426, 435-36 (3d Cir. 2009) (finding jury could find plaintiff satisfied “regarded-as” definition based on evidence that employer perceived plaintiff as having a disability, whether accurate or not, and found her unfit for any job in the defendant’s restructured workforce because of that perception). 11 To establish a prima facie case under the ADEA requires a plain…
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172-73 (7th Cir. 2013) (noting that post-ADAAA, the ADA now covers impairments "lasting six months or less").
noting that post-ADAAA, the ADA now covers impairments "lasting six months or less"
Rule Authority · C.D. Ill. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1173 (7th Cir. 2013) (explaining that the relevant inquiry under the amended ADA is whether the alleged impairments “despite their short duration . . . substantially impaired a major life activity when they occurred”).
explaining that the relevant inquiry under the amended ADA is whether the alleged impairments “despite their short duration . . . substantially impaired a major life activity when they occurred”
Rule Authority · S.D. Ind. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (quotation and citation omitted).
quotation and citation omitted
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (quoting 42 U.S.C. 12101(3)(B)).
Rule Authority · S.D. Ill. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1173 (7th Cir. 2013) (finding that the plaintiff adequately plead he was qualified to perform essential functions of his job where he had 45 years of experience as a pipe welder and worked for defendant as a welder and pipe fitter for more than one month before being fired).
finding that the plaintiff adequately plead he was qualified to perform essential functions of his job where he had 45 years of experience as a pipe welder and worked for defendant as a welder and pipe fitter for more than one month before being fired
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (discussing the adverse action theory of discrimination); Bilinsky v. Am.
discussing the adverse action theory of discrimination
green MULLINS v. MILLER (2021)
Rule Authority · S.D. Ind. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc, 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1173 (7th Cir. 2013) (at summary judgment plaintiff’s years of experience as a pipe welder, combined with one month on the job after a hypertension incident, established a question of fact for the jury as to whether plaintiff was qualified to perform the essential functions of his job); Milsap v. City of Chicago, Case No. 16-CV- 4202, 2018 WL 488270 (N.D.
at summary judgment plaintiff’s years of experience as a pipe welder, combined with one month on the job after a hypertension incident, established a question of fact for the jury as to whether plaintiff was qualified to perform the essential functions of his job
Quote Authority · N.D. Ill. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Gogos, 737 F.3d at 1173 (“[Plaintiff] alleges that he suffered an adverse employment action because of his disability: he asserts that immediately after he reported his medical conditions to his foreman at AMS, the foreman fired him.”).4 While the Court previously indicated that Plaintiff could not attribute the alleged adverse employment actions to both gender and disability given the ADA’s “but-for” causation standard, the Court now concludes that at the pleading stage…
“[Plaintiff] alleges that he suffered an adverse employment action because of his disability: he asserts that immediately after he reported his medical conditions to his foreman at AMS, the foreman fired him.”
Rule Authority · W.D. Wis.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ind.
Sys., 737 F.3d 1170, 1173 (7th Cir. 2013) (complaint stated an ADA claim by pleading previous work experience and work for the company as a “welder and pipe fitter for more than a month before he was fired”).
complaint stated an ADA claim by pleading previous work experience and work for the company as a “welder and pipe fitter for more than a month before he was fired”
Rule Authority · S.D. Ill.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013)).
Rule Authority · W.D. Wis.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1173 (7th Cir. 2013); Kurowski v. Shinseki, 557 F. App’x 549, 553 (7th Cir. 2014); see also Vargas v. DeJoy, 980 F.3d 1184 , 1188 n.4 (7th Cir. 2020) (“[Courts] resolve Rehabilitation Act claims by looking to the same standards and provisions that govern the Americans with Disabilities Act.”).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ind.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ).
Rule Authority · W.D. Wis.
Sys., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)); see also Bell v. Taylor, 827 F.3d 699, 706 (7th Cir. 2016) (complaint may not be barred by claim preclusion).
quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · C.D. Ill.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · S.D. Ill.
A. Count IV- IHRA Disability Discrimination Claim To sufficiently plead disability discrimination under the IHRA, Plaintiff must allege “facts showing that (1) he is disabled; (2) he is qualified to perform the essential function of the job either with or without reasonable accommodation; and (3) he suffered an adverse employment action because of his disability.” Gogos v. AMS Mechanical Systems, Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (citations omitted) (internal quotati…
citations omitted
Rule Authority · E.D. Wis.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013)); see also 42 U.S.C. § 12117 (a) (adopting the enforcement procedures, including the administrative exhaustion requirement, governing actions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
In Gogos v. AMS Mechanical Systems, Inc., a plaintiff alleged that he suffered an episode of very high blood pressure, which impaired his circulatory function and caused intermittent vision loss. 737 F.3d 1170, 1173 (7th Cir. 2013).
green JOHNSON v. AULT (2024)
Rule Authority · S.D. Ind.
Transp., 809 F.3d 343, 345 (7th Cir. 2015) (citing Gogos v. AMS Mechanical Systems, Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013)).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1173 (7th Cir. 2013) (finding that plaintiff had adequately pled that he was qualified where he had alleged he had 45 years of experience as a welder and pipe fitter and had worked for defendant for over a month prior to being fired); Kelley v. Chi.
finding that plaintiff had adequately pled that he was qualified where he had alleged he had 45 years of experience as a welder and pipe fitter and had worked for defendant for over a month prior to being fired
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · W.D. Wis.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
internal quotation marks and citations omitted
green Patel v. Brennan (2023)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Since Patel complains of employment discrimination that occurred “after January 1, 2009, the 2008 amendments to the ADA, which expanded the Act’s coverage, apply to [her] claim.” Gogos v. AMS Mechanical Systems, Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (citing ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub.
citing ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110–325, 122 Stat. 3553
Rule Authority · S.D. Ind.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (quotation and citation omitted).
quotation and citation omitted
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1173 (7th Cir. 2013) (holding that welder sufficiently alleged he was qualified by stating he had forty-five years of welding experience and one month of experience at job in question while possessing chronic condition).
holding that welder sufficiently alleged he was qualified by stating he had forty-five years of welding experience and one month of experience at job in question while possessing chronic condition
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Since Mata complains of employment discrimination that occurred “after January 1, 2009, the 2008 amendments to the ADA, which expanded the Act’s coverage, apply to [her] claim.” Gogos v. AMS Mechanical Systems, Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (citing ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub.
citing ADA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110–325, 122 Stat. 3553
Rule Authority · W.D. Wis.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (adverse employment action an element of disability discrimination 12 under the ADA). “[A]lthough the definition of an adverse employment action is generous, an employee must show some quantitative or qualitative change in the terms or conditions of his employment or some sort of real harm.” See Chaib v. Indiana, 744 F.3d 974, 982 (7th Cir. 2014) (quoting Nagle v. Vill. of Calumet Park, 554 F.3d 1106, 1116 (7th Cir. 2009)).
adverse employment action an element of disability discrimination 12 under the ADA
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013)).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (quoting 42 U.S.C. 12101(3)(B)).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · S.D. Ind.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (quoting E.E.O.C. v. Lee's Log Cabin, Inc., 546 F.3d 438, 442 (7th Cir. 2008)).
quoting E.E.O.C. v. Lee's Log Cabin, Inc., 546 F.3d 438, 442 (7th Cir. 2008)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172-78 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (quotation marks omitted).
quotation marks omitted
Rule Authority · W.D. Va.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1173 (7th Cir. 2013) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Rule Authority · S.D. Ind.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (per curiam)).
per curiam
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill. · signal: cf.
See Lee, 2016 WL 6680483 , at *4 (explaining that plaintiff failed to allege what his job duties were, which duties he could perform, and which duties he could not perform, leaving the court to speculate as to essential functions of his job as transportation manager, whether he was qualified to perform those functions with or without reasonable accommodation, and what such accommodation might be); cf. Gogos v. AMS Mechanical Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1173 (7th Cir. 2013) (f…
finding that plaintiff adequately plead he was qualified to perform essential functions of his job where he had 45 years of experience as pipe welder and worked for defendant as welder and pipe fitter for more than one month before being fired
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
To set forth an ADA discrimination claim, a plaintiff must allege facts showing that “(1) he is ‘disabled’; (2) he is qualified to perform the essential function of the job either with or without reasonable accommodation; and (3) he suffered an adverse employment action because of his disability.” Gogos v. AMS Mechanical Systems, Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · C.D. Ill.
Gogos v. AMS Mechanical Systems, Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013); Kampier v. Emeritus Corp., 472 F.3d 930, 937 (7th Cir. 2007); Rooney v. Koch Air, LLC, 410 F.3d 376, 380-81 (7th Cir. 2005); Majors v. General Electric Company, 714 F.3d 527, 533 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1173 (7th Cir. 2013) (citing 29 C.F.R.
citing 29 C.F.R. Pt. 1630, App. at Section 1630.2(j)(1)(vii)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013) (citations omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
citations omitted
Rule Authority · E.D. Wis.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · W.D. Wis.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ind.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013)).
Rule Authority · W.D. Wis.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Sys., Inc., 737 F.3d 1170, 1172 (7th Cir. 2013).