State v. De La Torre (2014)
green
· 139 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 17 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2014 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201420202026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
State v. Ross (2025)
See State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 607 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014) ("The types of abuse enumerated in the statute, such as 'cruelly beating' and 'cruel and inhuman corporal punishment,' simply describe two factual circumstances that could satisfy the abuse element.").
"The types of abuse enumerated in the statute, such as 'cruelly beating' and 'cruel and inhuman corporal punishment,' simply describe two factual circumstances that could satisfy the abuse element."
green
State v. Castleberry (2014)
King, 299 Kan. 372 , Syl. ¶ 2, 323 P.3d 1277 .” 300 Kan. at 591.
green
State v. Charles (2016)
See State v. Duong, 292 Kan. 824, 831 , 257 P.3d 309 (2011); see also State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 612 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014) (statement occupying “middle ground” between impermissible opinion and permissible directional statement not improper in context of argument that followed).
statement occupying “middle ground” between impermissible opinion and permissible directional statement not improper in context of argument that followed
green
State v. Robinson (2015)
Ed. 2d 429 (2006); see State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 610 , 331 P.3d 815 , cert. denied 135 S. Ct. 728 (2014).
green
State v. Moyer (2015)
See State v. De La Torre , 300 Kan. 591 , 599, 331 P.3d 815 , cert. denied --- U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 728 , 190 L.Ed.2d 455 (2014).
green
State v. Wabaunsee (2025)
See State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 599 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014) (a 23 failure to instruct the jury regarding unanimity in a multiple acts case is not generally reversible when the defendant presents a unified defense).
a 23 failure to instruct the jury regarding unanimity in a multiple acts case is not generally reversible when the defendant presents a unified defense
green
State v. Yardley (2025)
See State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 595 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).
green
State v. Reynolds (2024)
See De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591 , Syl. ¶ 3 ("In a multiple acts case . . . the appellate court must [] determine whether the error warrants reversal or was harmless.
green
State v. Smith (2021)
See State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 609 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014) (holding that party benefiting from error carries burden to demonstrate harmlessness regardless of whether constitutional harmless error test or nonconstitutional harmless error test under K.S.A. 60-261 applies).
holding that party benefiting from error carries burden to demonstrate harmlessness regardless of whether constitutional harmless error test or nonconstitutional harmless error test under K.S.A. 60-261 applies
green
State v. Thornton (2020)
See State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 595 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).
green
State v. Bojorquez-Carrasco (2020)
See State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 595 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).
green
State v. Moyer (2017)
green
State v. Sprague (2015)
See State v. King, 297 Kan. 955, 979-80 , 305 P.3d 641 (2013); see also State v. Trujillo, 296 Kan. 625, 631 , 294 P.3d 281 (2013) (noting court’s decision to omit the ‘real possibility’ language from Voyles test to avoid confusion with the constitutional harmless error test).” Santos-Vega, 299 Kan. at 18 .’ State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 596 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).” State v. Castleberry, 301 Kan. 170, 185-86 , 339 P.3d 795 (2014).
green
State v. Moyer (2015)
green
State v. Reed (2015)
See State v. De La Torre, 300 Kan. 591, 602 , 331 P.3d 815 (2014).
green
State of Missouri v. John A. Hamby (2023)
Celis-Garcia noted, in obiter dictum, a risk of a non-unanimous verdict may also arise in factual scenarios involving “repeated, identical sexual acts committed at the same location and during a short time span” when the victim is “unable to distinguish sufficiently among the acts.” Id. at 157 n.8 (emphasis added); see also State v. De La Torre, 331 P.3d 815, 822 (Kan. 2014) (“[A] multiple acts problem may arise even when the factual details about the multiple incidents are …
“[A] multiple acts problem may arise even when the factual details about the multiple incidents are indefinite as to precisely when each occurred or even how many acts occurred.” (emphasis added)
green
State v. Aguilar (2016)
The Kansas Supreme Court has repeatedly said that “in a multiple acts case the State alleges several acts, any one of which coidd constitute the crime charged, and the jury must be unanimous as to which act the defendant committed.” (Emphasis added.) State v. Soto, 299 Kan. 102, 110 , 322 P.3d 334 (2014) (citing State v. Jones, 295 Kan. 1050 , Syl. ¶ 3, 288 P.3d 140 [2012]); accord De La Torre, 300 Kan. at 595 .