How cited: Kraus v. Board Of County Road Commissioners For The County Of Kent · Go Syfert

Kraus v. Board Of County Road Commissioners For The County Of Kent (1966)

green · 140 citation events across 27 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196619962026
green In re: Donald Trump (2017)
Rule Authority · 6th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Comm’rs for Kent Cty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Comm’rs for Kent Cnty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966) (observing that § 1292(b) “should be sparingly applied “and” is to be used only in exceptional cases”).
observing that § 1292(b) “should be sparingly applied “and” is to be used only in exceptional cases”
green In re Miedzianowski (2013)
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Comm’rs for Kent Cnty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir.1966) (observing that § 1292(b) “should be sparingly applied “and” is to be used only in exceptional cases”).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Kraus, 364 F.2d at 921.
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Kraus, 364 F.2d at 921.
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Com’ rs, supra 364 F.2d at 922.
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich. · 3 citations in this opinion
Comm’rs for Kent Cty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966) (quoting Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, 260 F.2d 431, 433 (3d Cir. 1958)).
quoting Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, 260 F.2d 431, 433 (3d Cir. 1958)
green Hardwick v. 3M Company (2021)
Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio · 2 citations in this opinion
Comm’rs for Kent Cty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966)); In re Trump, 874 F.3d 948, 952 (6th Cir. 2017) (same); In re General Motors, LLC, No. 19-0107, 2019 WL 8403402 , at *1 (6th Cir. Sept. 25, 2019) (stating appeal under § 1292 is “the exception, granted only in an extraordinary case.”).
green Howe v. City of Akron (2011)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio · 2 citations in this opinion
Road Commissioners of Kent County, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir.1966) (quoting Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, Inc., 260 F.2d 431 (3rd Cir.1958)). § 1292(b) is not appropriate for securing early resolution of disputes concerning whether the trial court properly applied the law to the facts.
Rule Authority · W.D. Tenn.
Road Comm’rs of the Cnty. of Kent, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966).
Quote Authority · E.D. Mich.
Comm’rs, 364 F.2d 919 , 922 (6th Cir. 1966) (“Congress intended that section 1292(b) should be sparingly applied.”).
“Congress intended that section 1292(b) should be sparingly applied.”
Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio
Road Commissioners of Kent County, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966) (quoting Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, Inc., 260 F.2d 431 (3rd Cir. 1958)). § 1292(b) is not appropriate for securing early resolution of disputes concerning whether the trial court properly applied the law to the facts.
quoting Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, Inc., 260 F.2d 431 (3rd Cir. 1958)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio
Comm’rs for Kent Cnty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966)).
green CBIZ, Inc. v. Cryan (2024)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio
Comm’rs for Kent Cnty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Comm'rs for Kent Cty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966) (quoting Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, 260 F.2d 431, 433 (3d Cir. 1958)).
quoting Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, 260 F.2d 431, 433 (3d Cir. 1958)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio
Comm’rs for Kent Cnty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966); see also Ingram v. Wayne Cnty., Mich., 81 F.4th 603, 612 (6th Cir. 2023).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio
Comm’rs for Kent Cnty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio
Comm’rs for Kent Cnty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Road Com’rs for Kent Cty., 364 F.2d 919, 921 (6th Cir.1966)).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Road Comm’rs of the Cnty. of Kent, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966) (quoting Milbert v. Bison Labs., Inc., 260 F.2d 431, 433 (3d Cir. 1958)).
quoting Milbert v. Bison Labs., Inc., 260 F.2d 431, 433 (3d Cir. 1958)
Rule Authority · W.D. Ky.
Comm’rs for Kent County, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Road Comm’rs for Kent Cnty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966) (stating that “Congress intended that section 1292(b) . . . be sparingly applied.
stating that “Congress intended that section 1292(b
Rule Authority · W.D. Ky.
Comm’rs for Kent County, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966).
Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio
Comm'rs for Kent Cty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966)); In re Trump, 874 F.3d 948, 952 (6th Cir. 2017) (same); In re General Motors, LLC, No. 19-0107, 2019 WL 8403402 , at *1 (6th Cir. Sept. 25, 2019) (stating appeal under § 1292 is “the exception, granted only in an extraordinary case.”).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Road Comm’rs of the Cnty. of Kent, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966)) (additional quotation marks and citation omitted).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Road Commissioners of Kent County, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6thCir.1966) (quoting Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, Inc., 260 F.2d 431 (3rd Cir.1958)).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio
Comm’rs for Kent County, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966)).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio
Comm’rs for Kent County, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966)).
Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio
Com’rs for Kent County, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir.1966)).
Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio
Road Comm’rs of the Cnty. of Kent, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir.1966) (quoting Milbert v. Bison Labs., Inc., 260 F.2d 431, 433 (3d Cir.1958)).
Rule Authority · Ct. Intl. Trade
Commissioners for the County of Kent, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966); Cardwell v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., 504 F.2d 444 (6th Cir. 1974).
Rule Authority · Ct. Intl. Trade
Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement Co., 459 U.S. 1190 (1983); Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Incorporated, 519 F.2d 974 , 995 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1018 (1975); Alabama Labor Council Local No. 1279 v. Alabama, 453 F.2d 922, 924 (5th Cir. 1972); Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966).
green Kelley v. Secretary (1986)
Rule Authority · Ct. Intl. Trade
See Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, 260 F.2d 431, 433 (3d Cir. 1958) (discussing parallel interlocutory appeal provision applicable to federal district courts) (cited in Caldwell v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., 504 F.2d 444, 446 (6th Cir. 1974); Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966)).
Rule Authority · E.D. Wis.
Kirchen v. Guaranty National Insurance Company, 422 F.Supp. 58, 61 (E.D.Wis.1976); Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir.1966).
Rule Authority · M.D. Tenn.
Cardwell v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., 504 F.2d 444, 446 (6th Cir.1974); Wagner v. Burlington Industries, Inc., 423 F.2d 1319,1322, n. 5 (6th Cir.1970); Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners, 364 F.2d 919, 922 [1] (6th Cir.1966).
Rule Authority · Vt.
See, e.g., Paschall v. Kansas City Star Co., 605 F.2d 403, 406 (8th Cir. 1979); Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966).
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
It is to be used only in exceptional cases where an intermediate appeal may avoid protracted and expensive litigation and is not intended to open the floodgates to a vast number of appeals from interlocutory orders in ordinary litigation.” Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966).
green Tenorio v. Cohen (1981)
Rule Authority · N.M. Ct. App.
“This statute was not intended to authorize interlocutory appeals in ordinary suits for personal injuries or wrongful death that can be tried and disposed of on their merits in a few days.” Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966).
Rule Authority · S.D. Ohio
This litigation is certainly not as simple as the personal injury litigation presented in Haraburda v. United States Steel Corporation, 187 F.Supp. 86 (W.D.Mich.1960) (denying section 1292(b) certification for lack of complexity), cited with approval in Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners, 364 F.2d 919, 921, 922 (6th Cir. 1966), 5 but, on the contrary, appears to be the “extraordinary type of case” which the Sixth Circuit has said is the specific kind of litigation c…
Rule Authority · W.D. Mich.
Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners, supra, 364 F.2d at 921 (emphasis supplied).
emphasis supplied
Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.
Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners, 364 F.2d 919, 921 (6th Cir., 1966); Medomsley Steam Shipping Company v. Elizabeth River Terminals, Inc., 317 F.2d 741 (4th Cir., 1963); see also 1958 U.S.Code Congressional and Administrative News, pages 5260 and 5261.
Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.
In this petition, the defendant seeks a certificate in accordance with the provisions contained in § 1292(b) of Title 28 United States Code, 1 and has petitioned the Court to find that the order entered on January 20, 1970 “involves a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from this order may materially advance the ultimate termination of this litigation.” In Kraus v. Board of County Road Com…
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see
See Kraus v. Board of County Road Comm'rs., 364 F.2d 919 , 922 (6th Cir.1966); Lynch v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 701 F.2d 44, 45 (6th Cir.1983) (per curiam). 4 It is therefore ORDERED that the defendant's appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the defendant's right to file a timely petition for permission to appeal in the event of proper certification by the district court.
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: accord
Accord, Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners for Kent County, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966) (purpose to avoid protracted and expensive litigation); E.
purpose to avoid protracted and expensive litigation
Cited · N.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See Kraus v. Board of County Com’rs., 364 F.2d 919 (6th Cir.1966); see also, Philan Ins.
green Herold v. Braun (1987)
Cited · E.D.N.Y · signal: see
See Kraus v. Board of County Road Comm’rs, 364 F.2d 919 , 922 (6th Cir.1966).
green Hooks v. Wainwright (1982)
Cited · M.D. Fla. · signal: see
See Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners, 364 F.2d 919, 922 , (6th Cir. 1966); United States Rubber Co. v. Wright, 359 F.2d 784, 785 (9th Cir. 1966); In re Heddendorf, 263 F.2d 887 , 888 (1st Cir. 1959).
Cited · W.D. Pa. · signal: accord
Accord, Kraus v. Board of County Road Commissioners for Kent County, 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966) (purpose to avoid protracted and expensive litigation); E.
purpose to avoid protracted and expensive litigation