Gaito v. Strauss (1966)

green · 47 citation events across 15 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 13

Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

196619962026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Death Row Prisoners v. Ridge (1996)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2242 (West 1994); Gaito v. Strauss, 368 F.2d 787, 788 (3d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 977 , 87 S.Ct. 1173 , 18 L.Ed.2d 139 (1967).

green Bashir v. U. S. Attorney General (1981)

Rule Authority · E.D. Va.

Accord: Gaito v. Strauss, 368 F.2d 787, 788 (3rd Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 977 , 87 S.Ct. 1173 , 18 L.Ed.2d 139 (1967) (“District Court could not treat his civil rights complaint as a petition for habeas corpus since the warden of the state prison in which the appellant was incarcerated was not a party... ”); Billiteri v. U. S. Board of Parole, 541 F.2d 938 , 948 (2nd Cir. 1976) (Court lacked jurisdiction where Warden of Federal Penitentiary at Lewis-burg, Pennsylva…

green DeSousa v. Abrams (1979)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y

Accordingly, it has been repeatedly held that failure to name as respondent the party having custody of the applicant is fatal to the right to a writ of habeas corpus, see e. g., Billiteri v. United States Bd. of Parole, 541 F.2d 938 , 948 (2d Cir. 1976); Gaito v. Strauss, 368 F.2d 787, 788 (3d Cir. 1966); Morehead v. State of California, 339 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1964), and that a federal court has no jurisdiction to consider such an action.

green Edwards v. Schmidt (1971)

Rule Authority · W.D. Wis.

Gaito v. Ellenbogen, 425 F.2d 845 (3rd Cir. 1970); Bennett v. Allen, 396 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1968); Gaito v. Strauss, 368 F.2d 787, 788 (3rd Cir. 1966), cert. denied 386 U. S. 977 , 87 S.Ct. 1173 , 18 L.Ed.2d 139 ; Johnson v. Walker, 317 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1963); Smith v. Logan, 311 F. Supp. 898 (W.D.Va.1970); United States ex rel.

green Groppi v. Froehlich (1970)

Rule Authority

Gaito v. Strauss, 368 F.2d 787, 788 (3d Cir. 1966), cert. den., 386 U.S. 977 ; Johnson v. Walker, 317 F.2d 418 (5th Cir. 1963) ; Martin v. Roach, 280 F.Supp. 480 (S.D.N.Y.1968) ; May v. Peyton, 268 F.Supp. 928 (W.D.Va.1967) ; Davis v. State of Maryland, 248 F.Supp. 951 (D.Md.1965); Threatt v. State of North Carolina, 221 F.Supp. 858 (W.D.N.C.1963). .

green Osborn v. Commonwealth, Court of Common Pleas (1967)

Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.

Gaito v. Strauss, 368 F. 2d 787, 788 (3d Cir. 1966); King v. State of California, 356 F.2d 950 (9th Cir. 1966); Morehead v. State of California, 339 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1964); Roseborough v. People of State of California, 322 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1963); United States ex rel.

green United States ex rel. Lyle v. Carney (1967)

Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.

Gaito v. Strauss, 368 F. 2d 787, 788 (3d Cir. 1966); King v. State of California, 356 F.2d 950 (9th Cir. 1966); Morehead v. State of California, 339 F.2d 170 (9th Cir. 1964); Roseborough v. People of the State of California, 322 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1963).

green Thomas A. Guerro v. Roger F. Mulhearn, Ralph F. Andrews v. Kathy Decote Young (1974)

Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see also

See Kalec v. Adamowski, 406 F.2d 536 (7th Cir. 1969); Edwards v. Schmidt, 321 F.Supp. 68 (W.D.Wis.1971); see also Gaito v. Strauss, 249 F.Supp. 923, 930 (W.D.Pa.), aff’d on different grounds, 368 F.2d 787 (3rd Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 977 , 87 S.Ct. 1173 , 18 L.Ed.2d 139 (1967); cf. Ray v. Fritz, 468 F.2d 586 (2d Cir. 1972); Ney v. California, 439 F.2d 1285 (9th Cir. 1971). 9 .

green Edward Arnold Church v. William Hamilton, a Detective of the Chester Police Department, in and for the City o… (1971)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See Gaito v. Strauss, D.C., 249 F.Supp. 923 , aff’d., 368 F.2d 787 (3d Cir. 1966).

green Stephen Kalec v. Benjamin S. Adamowski, State's Attorney of Cook County, Illinois (1969)

Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see

See Gaito v. Strauss, 3 Cir., 368 F.2d 787 (1966).

green Drum v. Nasuti (1986)

Cited (see also) · E.D. Pa. · signal: see also

See also Gaito v. Strauss, 249 F.Supp. 923, 932 (W.D.Pa.), aff'd., 368 F.2d 787 (3d Cir.1966) (date of accrual is achievement of goal of conspiracy, which was last overt act effectuating plaintiff's imprisonment, thus not later than plaintiff’s sentencing; allegedly continuous and successful efforts by defendants since then can be regarded as elements of continuing damage accruing from culmination of alleged conspiracy in sentencing).

green Howard v. Rolufs (1972)

Cited (see also) · E.D. Mo. · signal: see also

See also, Gaito v. Strauss, 249 F.Supp. 923 (W.D.Pa. 1966), aff'd 368 F.2d 787 (3rd Cir.), cert. den. 386 U.S. 977 , 87 S.Ct. 1173 , 18 L.Ed.2d 139 ; Baker v. McGinnis, 286 F.Supp. 280 (S.D.N.Y.1968); Smith v. Logan, 311 F.Supp. 898 (W.D.Va.1970); Duncombe v. New York, 267 F.Supp. 103, 109 (S.D.N.Y.1967). [1] To permit this action would not foreclose another attack on the alleged constitutional violations of his trial by habeas corpus for release from custody.

green United States ex rel. Sabella v. Newsday (1970)

Cited · E.D.N.Y · signal: see

See Gaito v. Strauss, 249 F.Supp. 923, 932 (W.D.Pa.), aff’d, 368 F.2d 787 (3d Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 977 , 87 S.Ct. 1173 , 18 L.Ed.2d 139 (1967) (final date of conspiracy was sentencing); cf. Chartener v. Kice, 270 F.Supp. 432, 438-439 (E.D.N.Y.1967) (statute tolled if insanity caused by the malpractice); but cf. Mulligan v. Sehlacter, 389 F.2d 231, 233 (6th Cir. 1968) (cause of action based on arrest without probable cause accrued prior to incarceration).