Lewis v. State (2014)
green
· 60 citation events
across 2 courts.
Showing the 23 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201520202026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Thompson v. State (2024)
See, e.g., Montgomery v. State, 315 Ga. 467, 474 (3) ( 883 SE2d 351 ) (2023); Bundel v. State, 308 Ga. 317, 318-319 (1) ( 840 SE2d 349 ) (2020); Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 (3) ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014).
green
King v. State (2023)
See, e.g., Montgomery v. State, 315 Ga. 467, 474 ( 883 SE2d 351 ) (2023); Bundel v. State, 308 Ga. 317, 318-319 ( 840 SE2d 349 ) (2020); Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014).
green
Betty Ayers-Jones v. State (2019)
Appellate courts may “only review the case under the standard espoused in Jackson v. Virginia [ 443 U. S. 307, 319 (III) (B) ( 99 SCt 2781 , 61 LE2d 560) (1979)], to determine if the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, supports the verdict.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014).
green
Ashley v. the State (2017)
Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 (3) ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014) (citation and punctuation omitted).
green
Rebecca Wiggins v. State (2016)
However, when a defendant seeks appellate review of “a trial court’s refusal to grant a new trial on the general grounds . . . , [the appellate courts] can only review the case under the standard espoused in Jackson v. Virginia, [ 443 U.S. 307 ( 99 SCt 2781 , 61 LE2d 560) (1979)], to determine if the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, supports the verdict.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 (3) ( 765 SE2d …
green
Wiggins v. State (2016)
(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 (3) ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014).
green
Harper v. State (2015)
Although Harper contends that the testimony of Clark and the two inmates was not reliable, direct evidence is not converted into circumstantial evidence by a witness’s credibility or lack thereof, see Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 (2) ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014), and the weight and reliability of such evidence is for the jury’s resolution.
green
Hill v. State (2015)
Appellant disputes the credibility of the identification testimony, but “direct evidence from a witness who observed a crime is not converted into circumstantial evidence by the witness’s credibility or lack thereof.” Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014).
green
Taylor v. the State (2015)
We adopt the first of these spellings. 2 Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 ( 99 SCt 2781 , 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 3 However, Watkins testified that Taylor was not associated with the Crips; instead, he had just been invited to “chill” with the others that day. 4 Faulks, Gary (the murder victim), and Stroud were identified as associating with Bloomfield. 5 Moreover, to the extent Taylor is asserting that the trial court erred in refusing to grant a new trial on what is commonly…
green
Poole v. State (2021)
See Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259 (3) (765 SE2d 911) (2014).
green
Thrift v. State (2020)
See Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 (3) ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014).
green
Perez v. State (2020)
See Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 (3) ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014).
green
Clay v. State (2020)
See Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 (3) ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014).
green
Davenport v. State (2020)
See Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 (3) ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014). other special grounds of the motion for new trial which were not argued will be considered abandoned.”); Alexander v. State, 225 Ga. 358, 360-361 (5) ( 168 SE2d 315 ) (1969) (“While the sufficiency of the evidence to authorize the verdict is raised by other enumerations of error, such question is treated as abandoned inasmuch as the same is not argued by the appellant.”).
green
Smith v. State (2020)
See Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 260-261 ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014) (credibility of witness who initially lied to police because she “did not want to get involved . . . is a matter to be decided by the jury that saw and heard the testimony, not by an appellate court reviewing a 7 transcript” (citation and punctuation omitted)).
green
Green v. State (2018)
See Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 (3) ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014).
green
Green v. State (2018)
See Lewis v. State , 296 Ga. 259 , 261 (3), 765 S.E.2d 911 (2014).
green
Menzies v. State (2018)
See Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014); Joyner v. State, 280 Ga. 37, 38-39 ( 622 SE2d 319 ) (2005).
green
Menzies v. State (2018)
See *643 Lewis v. State , 296 Ga. 259 , 261, 765 S.E.2d 911 (2014) ; Joyner v. State , 280 Ga. 37 , 38-39, 622 S.E.2d 319 (2005).
green
Carter v. State (2017)
See Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 (3) ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014). 3 unqualified juror on its own motion.
green
Carter v. State (2017)
See Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 (3) ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014).
green
Norman v. State (2016)
See Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014). 3.
green
Lucas v. the State (2015)
See Lewis v. State, 296 Ga. 259, 261 (3) ( 765 SE2d 911 ) (2014).