How cited: Fred J. Ford v. United States · Go Syfert

Fred J. Ford v. United States (1967)

green · 73 citation events across 25 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196719962026
green Cuyler v. Sullivan (1980)
Rule Authority · SCOTUS · 2 citations in this opinion
C. 346, 348-349, 379 F. 2d 123, 125-126 (1967).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Ford v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 346 , 379 F.2d 123, 126 (1967).
green State v. Bellucci (1980)
Rule Authority · N.J. · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Carrigan, 543 F.2d at 1056 ; Ford v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 346, 348 , 379 F.2d 123, 125 (D.C.Cir.1967); Lollar v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. at 204 , 376 F.2d at 247 ; United States v. Foster, 469 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 1972).
Rule Authority · N.D. Cal.
See Bucuvalas v. United States, 98 F.3d 652, 655 (1st Cir.1996) (exercising supervisory power to require that federal district courts inquire into representation of multiple defendants by a single attorney); Henderson v. Smith, 903 F.2d 534, 537 (8th Cir.) (grounding requirements on inquiry into multiple representation in supervisory powers), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 989 , 111 S.Ct. 529 , 112 L.Ed.2d 539 (1990); Ford v. United States, 379 F.2d 123, 125-26 (D.C.Cir.1967) (same).
green Moseley v. Scully (1995)
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
See, e.g., United States v. Waldman, 579 F.2d 649, 651-52 (1st Cir.1978); Ford v. United States, 379 F.2d 123, 125-26 (D.C.Cir.1967). 14 .
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Ford v. United States, 379 F.2d 123, 125-26 (D.C.Cir.1967).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Ford v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 346 , 379 F.2d 123, 125-26 (1967).
Rule Authority · D.C.
Watkins v. United States, supra; Lollar v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 200 , 204, 376 F.2d 243, 247 (1967); Ford v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 346, 348 , 379 F.2d 123, 125 (1967).
green Hall v. United States (1967)
Rule Authority · D.C.
Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 76 , 62 S.Ct. 457 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942); Ford v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 346 , 379 F.2d 123, 125 (1967); Lollar v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 200 , 376 F.2d 243, 247 (1967); Campbell v. United States, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 143 , 352 F.2d 359 (1965). 6 The standard to be applied is whether, on the record, the reviewing court can arrive at an “informed speculation” of some prejudice, or, conversely, whether it is convinced beyond …
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Ford v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 346 , 379 F.2d 123, 126 (1967); Lollar v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 200 , 376 F.2d 243 (1967).