In re Deborah S. (2015)

green · 17 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 5

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Kurtz v. Illinois Department of Public Health (2023)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct. · 2 citations in this opinion

In re Deborah S., 2015 IL App (1st) 123596, ¶ 24 (citing 625 ILCS 5/6-103(5), (8) (West 2012)).

green In re L.K. (2020)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

Moreover, respondent has not relied upon “vague unsupported statements that collateral consequences might plague [him] in the future.” In re Deborah S., 2015 IL App (1st) 123596, ¶ 23 (citing In re Rita P., 2014 IL 115798, ¶¶ 33-34 ).

green People ex rel. Lindblom v. Sears Brands, LLC (2024)

Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see

See In re Deborah S., 2015 IL App (1st) 123596, ¶ 29 (a decision is against the manifest weight of the evidence when the opposite conclusion is apparent or when the findings are unreasonable, arbitrary, or not based on the evidence). 23 1-23-1163) 1-23-1177) Cons. ¶ 67 C.

green People v. Hayes (2019)

Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see

See In re Deborah S., 2015 IL App (1st) 123596, ¶ 27 (finding the failure of an appellee to respond to an appellant’s arguments on an issue tantamount to a concession).

green People v. Hayes (2018)

Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see

See In re Deborah S. , 2015 IL App (1st) 123596 , ¶ 27, 389 Ill.Dec. 516 , 26 N.E.3d 922 (finding the failure of an appellee to respond to an appellant's arguments on an issue tantamount to a concession).