How cited: In re N.B. · Go Syfert

In re N.B. (2015)

green · 182 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 46 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201520202026
green In re U.B. (2025)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Similarly, a “‘parent’s right to raise a child is an essential basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green In re L.N. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Law and Analysis The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997); see also In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 157 (1990) (a parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody, and management” of his or her child), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982).
green In re T.F. (2025)
Rule Authority · 2 citations in this opinion
“We will not reverse a juvenile court’s termination of parental rights and award of permanent custody to an agency unless the judgment is not supported by clear and convincing evidence.” In re S.H., 2019-Ohio-3575, ¶ 25 (8th Dist.), citing In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 48 (8th Dist.); see also In re M.J., 2013-Ohio-5440, ¶ 24 (8th Dist.).
green In re B.G.M. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Permanent Custody A. Statutory Requirements The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green In re Y.F. (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
A parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody and management” of his or her child, In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982), and the right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green In re A.H. (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Law and Analysis A. Permanent Custody The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio 2 CCDCFS moved for a stay of the trial court’s judgment during the pendency of this appeal, which this court granted.
green In re K.C. (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
In re Dylan C., 121 Ohio App.3d 115, 121 , (6th Dist.1997); In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 48 (8th Dist.). “ ‘Clear and convincing evidence’ is evidence that ‘will produce in the mind of the trier of facts a firm belief or conviction as to the allegations sought to be established.’ ” In re T.B., 2014-Ohio-2051, ¶ 28 (8th Dist.), quoting Cross v. Ledford, 161 Ohio St. 469 , 477 (1954).
green In re R.H. (2024)
Rule Authority · 2 citations in this opinion
The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997); see also In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 157 (1990) (a parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody, and management” of his or her child), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982).
green In re M.T. (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997) (internal quotation omitted); see also In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 157 (1990) (a parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody, and management” of his or her child), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982).
green In re L.W. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green In re Y.T. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982), and the right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green In re C.M. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
When deciding to terminate an individual’s parental rights, the goal “‘is to make a more stable life for the dependent children and to facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.’” In re U.B., 2025-Ohio-1265, ¶ 22 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.).
green In re A.M. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
A parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody and management” of his or her child, In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982), and the right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green In re D.D. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green In re A.K. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
A parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody and management” of his or her child, In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982), and the right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green In re C.H. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
A parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody and management” of his or her child, In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982), and the right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green In re C.F. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green In re M.C. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
When parental rights are terminated, the goal is to create “a more stable life” for dependent children and to “facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , *5 (5th Dist.
green In re A.N. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
A parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody and management” of his or her child, In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982), and the right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green L.G. v. R.G. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green In re Y.G. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
When parental rights are terminated, the goal is to create “a more stable life” for dependent children and to “facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , 5 (5th Dist.
green In re B.C. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re C.T., 2020-Ohio-4965, ¶ 57 (5th Dist.), citing, In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green In re C.H. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
When deciding to terminate an individual’s parental rights to their children, the goal “‘is to make a more stable life for the dependent children and to facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.’” In re U.B., 2025- Ohio-1265, ¶ 22 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.).
green In re S.M. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
“By terminating parental rights, the goal is to create ‘a more stable life’ for dependent children and to ‘facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.’” In re R.G., 2016-Ohio-7897 , ¶ 21 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , *5 (5th Dist.
green In re N.A.-S. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green In re G.J. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
Indeed, “[t]he right to raise one’s own child is ‘“an essential and basic civil right.”’” In re B.G.M., 2025- Ohio-1465, ¶ 33 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green In re Z.L. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
And that a “‘parent’s right to raise a child is an essential basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green In re J.H. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re Z.C. at ¶ 14. “[W]e will not reverse a juvenile court’s termination of parental rights and award of permanent custody to an agency unless the judgment is not supported by clear and convincing evidence.” In re S.H., 2019-Ohio-3575, ¶ 25 (8th Dist.), citing In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 48 (8th Dist.); see also In re M.J., 2013-Ohio- 5440, ¶ 24 (8th Dist.).
green In re Z.B. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
The right to raise one’s own child is ‘“an essential and basic civil right.”’ In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green In re A.R. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
When parental rights are terminated, the goal is to create “a more stable life” for dependent children and to “facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , *5 (5th Dist.
green In re R.W. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
The right to raise one’s own child is ‘“an essential and basic civil right.”’ In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green In re Z.H. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green In re T.R. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re R.G., 2016-Ohio-7897 , at ¶ 28 (8th Dist.), citing In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, at ¶ 59 (8th Dist.); In re Awkal, 95 Ohio App.3d 309, 315 (8th Dist. 1994).
green In re Z.C. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re R.S., 2022-Ohio-4387, ¶ 45 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, at ¶ 60 (8th Dist.).
green In re T.B. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
“We will not reverse a juvenile court’s termination of parental rights and award of permanent custody to an agency unless the judgment is not supported by clear and convincing evidence.” In re S.H., 2019-Ohio-3575, at ¶ 25 (8th Dist.), citing In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 48 (8th Dist.); see also In re M.J., 2013-Ohio-5440, ¶ 24 (8th Dist.).
green In re J.C. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re R.S., 2022-Ohio-4387, ¶ 45 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, at ¶ 60 (8th Dist.).
green In re A.M. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
When parental rights are terminated, the goal is to create “a more stable life” for dependent children and to “facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , 5 (5th Dist.
green In re T.M. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.).
green In re A.M. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
“We will not reverse a juvenile court’s termination of parental rights and award of permanent custody to an agency unless the judgment is not supported by clear and convincing evidence.” In re S.H., 2019-Ohio-3575, at ¶ 25 (8th Dist.), citing In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 48 (8th Dist.); see also In re M.J., 2013-Ohio-5440, ¶ 24 (8th Dist.). {¶ 27} As discussed above, the record indicates that father expressed little interest in the children, even when Ar.M. was in an intensi…
green In re E.B. (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re R.H., 2024-Ohio-5009, ¶ 45 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.).
green In re L.V. (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
When parental rights are terminated, the goal is to create “a more stable life” for dependent children and to “facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , 5 (5th Dist.
green In re M.K. (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re R.S., 2022-Ohio-4387, ¶ 45 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, at ¶ 60 (8th Dist.).
green In re J.H. (2024)
Rule Authority
Where parental rights are terminated, the goal is to create “a more stable life” for dependent children and to “facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , 5 (5th Dist.
green In re S.H. (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green In re K.S. (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
In re R.G., 2016-Ohio-7897 , at ¶ 28 (8th Dist.), citing In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.); In re Awkal, 95 Ohio App.3d 309, 315 (8th Dist. 1994).
green In re KY.D. (2024)
Rule Authority
Law and Analysis The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997); see also In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982) (a parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody, and management” of his or her child).