In re N.B. (2015)
green
· 182 citation events
across 3 courts.
Showing the 46 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201520202026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
In re U.B. (2025)
Similarly, a “‘parent’s right to raise a child is an essential basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green
In re L.N. (2026)
Law and Analysis The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997); see also In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 157 (1990) (a parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody, and management” of his or her child), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982).
green
In re T.F. (2025)
“We will not reverse a juvenile court’s termination of parental rights and award of permanent custody to an agency unless the judgment is not supported by clear and convincing evidence.” In re S.H., 2019-Ohio-3575, ¶ 25 (8th Dist.), citing In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 48 (8th Dist.); see also In re M.J., 2013-Ohio-5440, ¶ 24 (8th Dist.).
green
In re B.G.M. (2025)
Permanent Custody A. Statutory Requirements The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green
In re Y.F. (2024)
A parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody and management” of his or her child, In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982), and the right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green
In re A.H. (2024)
Law and Analysis A. Permanent Custody The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio 2 CCDCFS moved for a stay of the trial court’s judgment during the pendency of this appeal, which this court granted.
green
In re K.C. (2024)
In re Dylan C., 121 Ohio App.3d 115, 121 , (6th Dist.1997); In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 48 (8th Dist.). “ ‘Clear and convincing evidence’ is evidence that ‘will produce in the mind of the trier of facts a firm belief or conviction as to the allegations sought to be established.’ ” In re T.B., 2014-Ohio-2051, ¶ 28 (8th Dist.), quoting Cross v. Ledford, 161 Ohio St. 469 , 477 (1954).
green
In re R.H. (2024)
The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997); see also In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 157 (1990) (a parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody, and management” of his or her child), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982).
green
In re M.T. (2024)
The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997) (internal quotation omitted); see also In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 157 (1990) (a parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody, and management” of his or her child), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982).
green
In re L.W. (2026)
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green
In re Y.T. (2026)
In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982), and the right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green
In re C.M. (2026)
When deciding to terminate an individual’s parental rights, the goal “‘is to make a more stable life for the dependent children and to facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.’” In re U.B., 2025-Ohio-1265, ¶ 22 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.).
green
In re A.M. (2026)
A parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody and management” of his or her child, In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982), and the right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green
In re D.D. (2026)
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green
In re A.K. (2026)
A parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody and management” of his or her child, In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982), and the right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green
In re C.H. (2026)
A parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody and management” of his or her child, In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982), and the right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green
In re C.F. (2026)
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green
In re M.C. (2026)
When parental rights are terminated, the goal is to create “a more stable life” for dependent children and to “facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , *5 (5th Dist.
green
In re A.N. (2026)
A parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody and management” of his or her child, In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982), and the right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green
L.G. v. R.G. (2026)
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green
In re Y.G. (2026)
When parental rights are terminated, the goal is to create “a more stable life” for dependent children and to “facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , 5 (5th Dist.
green
In re B.C. (2026)
In re C.T., 2020-Ohio-4965, ¶ 57 (5th Dist.), citing, In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green
In re C.H. (2025)
When deciding to terminate an individual’s parental rights to their children, the goal “‘is to make a more stable life for the dependent children and to facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.’” In re U.B., 2025- Ohio-1265, ¶ 22 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.).
green
In re S.M. (2025)
“By terminating parental rights, the goal is to create ‘a more stable life’ for dependent children and to ‘facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.’” In re R.G., 2016-Ohio-7897 , ¶ 21 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , *5 (5th Dist.
green
In re N.A.-S. (2025)
The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green
In re G.J. (2025)
Indeed, “[t]he right to raise one’s own child is ‘“an essential and basic civil right.”’” In re B.G.M., 2025- Ohio-1465, ¶ 33 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green
In re Z.L. (2025)
And that a “‘parent’s right to raise a child is an essential basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green
In re J.H. (2025)
In re Z.C. at ¶ 14. “[W]e will not reverse a juvenile court’s termination of parental rights and award of permanent custody to an agency unless the judgment is not supported by clear and convincing evidence.” In re S.H., 2019-Ohio-3575, ¶ 25 (8th Dist.), citing In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 48 (8th Dist.); see also In re M.J., 2013-Ohio- 5440, ¶ 24 (8th Dist.).
green
In re Z.B. (2025)
The right to raise one’s own child is ‘“an essential and basic civil right.”’ In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green
In re A.R. (2025)
When parental rights are terminated, the goal is to create “a more stable life” for dependent children and to “facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , *5 (5th Dist.
green
In re R.W. (2025)
The right to raise one’s own child is ‘“an essential and basic civil right.”’ In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997).
green
In re Z.H. (2025)
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green
In re T.R. (2025)
In re R.G., 2016-Ohio-7897 , at ¶ 28 (8th Dist.), citing In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, at ¶ 59 (8th Dist.); In re Awkal, 95 Ohio App.3d 309, 315 (8th Dist. 1994).
green
In re Z.C. (2025)
In re R.S., 2022-Ohio-4387, ¶ 45 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, at ¶ 60 (8th Dist.).
green
In re T.B. (2025)
“We will not reverse a juvenile court’s termination of parental rights and award of permanent custody to an agency unless the judgment is not supported by clear and convincing evidence.” In re S.H., 2019-Ohio-3575, at ¶ 25 (8th Dist.), citing In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 48 (8th Dist.); see also In re M.J., 2013-Ohio-5440, ¶ 24 (8th Dist.).
green
In re J.C. (2025)
In re R.S., 2022-Ohio-4387, ¶ 45 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, at ¶ 60 (8th Dist.).
green
In re A.M. (2025)
When parental rights are terminated, the goal is to create “a more stable life” for dependent children and to “facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , 5 (5th Dist.
green
In re T.M. (2025)
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.).
green
In re A.M. (2025)
“We will not reverse a juvenile court’s termination of parental rights and award of permanent custody to an agency unless the judgment is not supported by clear and convincing evidence.” In re S.H., 2019-Ohio-3575, at ¶ 25 (8th Dist.), citing In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 48 (8th Dist.); see also In re M.J., 2013-Ohio-5440, ¶ 24 (8th Dist.). {¶ 27} As discussed above, the record indicates that father expressed little interest in the children, even when Ar.M. was in an intensi…
green
In re E.B. (2025)
The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re R.H., 2024-Ohio-5009, ¶ 45 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.).
green
In re L.V. (2024)
When parental rights are terminated, the goal is to create “a more stable life” for dependent children and to “facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , 5 (5th Dist.
green
In re M.K. (2024)
In re R.S., 2022-Ohio-4387, ¶ 45 (8th Dist.), quoting In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, at ¶ 60 (8th Dist.).
green
In re J.H. (2024)
Where parental rights are terminated, the goal is to create “a more stable life” for dependent children and to “facilitate adoption to foster permanency for children.” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), citing In re Howard, 1986 Ohio App. LEXIS 7860 , 5 (5th Dist.
green
In re S.H. (2024)
In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.).
green
In re K.S. (2024)
In re R.G., 2016-Ohio-7897 , at ¶ 28 (8th Dist.), citing In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 59 (8th Dist.); In re Awkal, 95 Ohio App.3d 309, 315 (8th Dist. 1994).
green
In re KY.D. (2024)
Law and Analysis The right to raise one’s own child is “‘an essential and basic civil right.’” In re N.B., 2015-Ohio-314, ¶ 67 (8th Dist.), quoting In re Hayes, 79 Ohio St.3d 46, 48 (1997); see also In re Murray, 52 Ohio St.3d 155, 156 (1990), quoting Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 753 (1982) (a parent has a “‘fundamental liberty interest’ in the care, custody, and management” of his or her child).