United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. R. S. Perkins (1968)
green
· 34 citation events
across 17 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196819972026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Co., v. Perkins, 388 F.2d 771 , 773 (10th Cir. 1968) (“Whether third-party defendants may be brought in and retained in the action is ordinarily a matter addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge.”). 2 A third-party claim may be asserted under Rule 14 “only when the third party’s liability is in some way dependent on the outcome of the main claim or when the third party is secondarily liable to the defendant.”4 The original defendant’s claim against a third-party …
“Whether third-party defendants may be brought in and retained in the action is ordinarily a matter addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge.”
Co. v. Perkins, 388 F.2d 771 , 773 (10th Cir. 1968) (“Rule 14(a) should be liberally construed to accomplish its purpose but it is not a catchall . . . .”). “[I]mpleader is proper only where the third-party defendant’s liability is ‘in some way derivative of the outcome of the main claim.’” Hefley v. Textron, Inc., 713 F.2d 1487, 1498 (10th Cir. 1983) (quoting United States v. Joe Grasso & Son, Inc., 380 F.2d 749, 751 (5th Cir. 1967)).
“Rule 14(a) should be liberally construed to accomplish its purpose but it is not a catchall . . . .”
Co. v. Perkins, 388 F.2d 771 , 773 (10th Cir. 1968) (“Rule 14(a) should be liberally construed to accomplish its purpose but it is not a catchall . . . .”). “[I]mpleader is proper only where the third-party defendant’s liability is ‘in some way derivative of the outcome of the main claim.’” Hefley v. Textron, Inc., 713 F.2d 1487, 1498 (10th Cir. 1983) (quoting United States v. Joe Grasso & Son, Inc., 380 F.2d 749, 751 (5th Cir. 1967)).
“Rule 14(a) should be liberally construed to accomplish its purpose but it is not a catchall . . . .”
Perkins, 388 F.2d at 773.
green
R.P. Small Corp. v. Kadakia (2020)
Co. v. Perkins, 388 F.2d 771 (10th Cir. 1968) (“If impleading a third party defendant would require the trial of issues not involved in the controversy between the original 4 parties without serving any convenience, there is no good reason to permit the third-party complaint to be filed”).
“If impleading a third party defendant would require the trial of issues not involved in the controversy between the original 4 parties without serving any convenience, there is no good reason to permit the third-party complaint to be filed”
green
Neill v. Borreson (In Re John Peterson Motors, Inc.) (1986)
See, e.g., Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 567 F.2d 429, 477 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978); United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Perkins, 388 F.2d 771, 773 (10th Cir.1968); Eastman Chemical International, Ltd. v. Virginia National Bank, 94 F.R.D. 21, 22 (E.D.Tenn.1981); Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. I.
See, e.g., Laffey v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 567 F.2d 429, 477 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1086 , 98 S.Ct. 1281 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978); United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Perkins, 388 F.2d 771, 773 (10th Cir.1968); Eastman Chemical International, Ltd. v. Virginia National Bank, 94 F.R.D. 21, 22 (E.D.Tenn.1981); Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. I.
green
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Joyanna Holitogs, Inc. v. I. Hyman Corp. (In Re Joyanna Holitogs… (1982)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Perkins, 388 F.2d 771, 733 (10th Cir. 1968).