How cited: MARK Et Al. v. AGERTER · Go Syfert

MARK Et Al. v. AGERTER (2015)

green · 6 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Quote Authority · Ga. Ct. App. · 2 citations in this opinion
Indeed, our Supreme Court has explained that “[a] motion in limine is a pretrial method of determining the admissibility of evidence, as a party may secure a pretrial ruling on the admissibility of evidence or a ruling prohibiting any reference to certain evidence until its admissibility can be assessed in the context of the trial as it unfolds.” Andrews v. Wilbanks, 265 Ga. 555, 556 ( 458 SE2d 817 ) (1995); accord Dep’t of Tra nsp. v. Wallace Enters, 234 Ga. App. 1, 5 (6) (…
“Because a motion in limine is a pretrial determination of the admissibility of evidence, the grant of a motion in limine excluding evidence is a judicial power which must be exercised with great care.”
Rule Authority · Ga. Ct. App.
Mark v. Agerter, 332 Ga. App. 879, 879 ( 775 SE2d 235 ) (2015).
Cited · Ga. Ct. App. · signal: accord · 2 citations in this opinion
Accord Mark v. Agerter, 332 Ga. App. 879 ( 775 SE2d 235 ) (2015).