How cited: Cluster 287842 · Go Syfert

Cluster 287842 (1969)

green · 132 citation events across 16 courts. Showing the 20 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196919972026
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Smith Corp., 420 F.2d 1, 6 (7th Cir. 1969); McCulloch v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., supra note 16; Lawrence Typographical Union v. McCulloch, supra note 17, 349 F.2d at 708 (Bazelon, J., concurring). .
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Smith Corp., 420 F.2d 1, 6 (7th Cir. 1969); Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158 , 1163-64 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 1012 , 89 S.Ct. 1628 , 23 L.Ed.2d 39 (1969); McCulloch v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co., 403 F.2d 916, 917 (D.C.Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1016 , 89 S.Ct. 618 , 21 L.Ed.2d 560 (1969). 1 Thus, unless the Board’s order in this case comes within the narrow exception to this rule of non-reviewability, we may not examine the propriety of…
Quote Authority · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See Smith Steel , 420 F.2d at 7 ("Arbitration provides an alternative means of resolving disputes over the appropriate representational unit, but it does not control the Board in subsequent proceedings."); Yellow Freight , 684 F.2d at 530 (" [A]ny ruling by the NLRB takes precedence over any potential decision by an arbitrator on the same issue." (emphasis added) ).
"Arbitration provides an alternative means of resolving disputes over the appropriate representational unit, but it does not control the Board in subsequent proceedings."
Quote Authority · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See Smith Steel, 420 F.2d at 7 (“Arbitration provides an alternative means of resolving disputes over the appropriate representational unit, but it does not control the Board in subsequent proceedings.”); Yellow Freight, 684 F.2d at 530 (“[A]ny ruling by the NLRB takes precedence over any potential decision by an arbitrator on the same issue.” (em- phasis added)).
“Arbitration provides an alternative means of resolving disputes over the appropriate representational unit, but it does not control the Board in subsequent proceedings.”
Quote Authority · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See Smith Steel, 420 F.2d at 7 (“Arbitration provides an alternative means of resolving disputes over the appropriate representational unit, but it does not control the Board in subsequent proceedings.”); Yellow Freight, 684 F.2d at 530 (“[A]ny ruling by the NLRB takes precedence over any potential decision by an arbitrator on the same issue.” (em- phasis added)).
“Arbitration provides an alternative means of resolving disputes over the appropriate representational unit, but it does not control the Board in subsequent proceedings.”
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Smith Corp., 420 F.2d 1, 7 (7th Cir.1969)).
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Smith Corp., 420 F.2d 1, 11 (7th Cir.1969); NLRB v. Krieger-Ragsdale & Co., 379 F.2d 517 (7th Cir.1967).
Rule Authority · 7th Cir.
Smith Corp., 420 F.2d 1, 11 (7th Cir.1969); NLRB v. Krieger-Ragsdale & Co., 379 F.2d 517 (7th Cir.1967).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Smith Corp., 420 F.2d 1, 10 (7th Cir. 1969); McGuire v. Humble Oil & Refining Co., 355 F.2d 352, 358 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 988 , 86 S.Ct. 1889 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1004 (1966).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Smith Corporation, supra at 9 (emphasis added).
emphasis added
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Smith Corporation, supra at 9 (emphasis added).
emphasis added
green United States v. Lark (1978)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Smith Co., 420 F.2d 1, 9 (7th Cir. 1969).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Smith Corp., 420 F.2d 1, 6 (7th Cir. 1969); Teamsters Local 542 v. Ace Enterprises, Inc., 332 F.Supp. 36, 38-39 (S.D.Cal.1971).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Smith Corp., 420 F.2d 1, 6 (7th Cir. 1969); Teamsters Local 542 v. Ace Enterprises, Inc., 332 F.Supp. 36, 38-39 (S.D.Cal.1971).
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
Smith Corp., 420 F.2d 1, 8 (7th Cir. 1969); Douds v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, 241 F.2d 278 , 281-83 (2d Cir. 1957) 9 The collective bargaining obligation, whose structure is built upon the bargaining unit established in accord with § 9 of the Act, exists only between an employer and the representative of its employees.
green Kelly v. Pearce (2016)
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Smith Corp., 420 F.2d 1, 9 (7th Cir.1969).
Rule Authority · D. Nev.
Id. at 6-7.
Rule Authority · M.D.N.C.
Smith, 420 F.2d at 7, 10 ; see Hairston v. McLean Trucking Co., 520 F.2d 226, 235 (4th Cir. 1975) (discriminatory contract terms not binding).
Cited (see also) · S.D. Cal. · signal: see also
See ECF No. 9, Scheduling Order; see also Groves v. 28 Prickett, 420 F.2d 1 l 19, 1125 (9th Cir. 1970).