Cluster 287861 (1970)
green
· 37 citation events
across 9 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196919972026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Investment Company Institute v. Camp (1971)
C. 241, 249-253, 266, 420 F. 2d 83 , 91-95, and 108, and, in particular, by Chief Judge Bazelon when he carefully examined the four "danger zones" considered by the SEC and the protections erected against them, and then concurred in the Commission's exercise of judgment.
green
Illinois Citizens Committee for Broadcasting v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America (1975)
Co. v. Kunzig, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 98 , 433 F.2d 1204 (1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 950 , 91 S.Ct. 1186 , 28 L.Ed. 234 (1971); National Welfare Rights Org. v. Finch, 139 U.S.App.D.C. 46 , 429 F.2d 725 , 732-35 (1970); Peoples v. Department of Agriculture, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 291 , 427 F.2d 561, 563-64 (1970); Scanwell Laboratories, Inc. v. Shaffer, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 371 , 424 F.2d 859, 870-71 (1970); National Ass’n of Securities Dealers v. SEC, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 241 , 420 F.2d 83, …
green
Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Federal Reserve Board, Bank America Corporation, Intervenor (1975)
Org. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150 , 90 S.Ct. 827 , 25 L.Ed.2d 184 (1970); National Ass’n of Securities Dealers, Inc. v. SEC, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 241 , 420 F.2d 83, 97-100 (1969), rev’d on other grounds, 401 U.S. 619 , 91 S.Ct. 1091 , 28 L.Ed.2d 367 (1971) (Bazelon, C.
Thus, it could be argued that rules against siphoning of programs, talent and audiences are required in order to prevent STV from damaging free television and imposing impermissible hardship on poor people; but any rules against siphoning would violate the first amendment, and thus the Commission and Congress are without power to approve direct-charge broadcasting. 33 The leading case is FCC v. Sanders Brothers Radio Station, 309 U.S. 470, 477 , 60 S.Ct. 693 (1940), where th…
Chief Judge Bazelon concurring
The leading case is FCC v. Sanders Brothers Radio Station, 309 U.S. 470, 477 , 60 S.Ct. 693 (1940), where the Supreme Court stated that in enacting the standing provisions of the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. § 402 (1964), Congress “may have been of the opinion that one likely to be financially injured by the issue of a license would be the only person having a sufficient interest to bring to the attention of the appellate court errors of law in the action of the Commission …
Chief Judge Bazelon concurring
green
Sierra Club v. Hardin (1971)
Cf. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 241 , 420 F.2d 83, 102-103 (1969) (concurring opinion of Circuit Judge Burger), cert. granted sub nom.
concurring opinion of Circuit Judge Burger
green
Sierra Club v. Hickel (1970)
See Flast v. Cohen, supra, [392 U.S.] at 101-106, 88 S.Ct. 1953 -1955.” Nor does the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706 , and particularly Section 702, aid the appellee here. 6 Judge Burger, now Mr. Chief Justice Burger, in a concurring opinion in National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. v. SEC, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 241 , 420 F.2d 83 , 101 (1969), cert. granted, 397 U.S. 986 , 90 S.Ct. 1114 , 25 L.Ed.2d 394 (1970) , commented that the above section broaden…
green
Sierra Club v. Hickel (1970)
See Flast v. Cohen, supra, [392 U.S.] at 101-106, 88 S.Ct. 1953 -1955." 43 Nor does the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706 , and particularly Section 702, aid the appellee here. 6 Judge Burger, now Mr. Chief Justice Burger, in a concurring opinion in National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. v. SEC, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 241 , 420 F.2d 83 , 101 (1969), cert. granted, 397 U.S. 986 , 90 S.Ct. 1114 , 25 L.Ed.2d 394 (1970), commented that the above section broad…