Securities And Exchange Commission v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc. (1970)

green · 30 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Yellow 2 Green 4

Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

197019982026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

yellow Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,597 J. C. Bellah and Wife Fern Bellah v. The First National Bank of Hereford, Hereford… (1974)

But See · 1st Cir. · signal: but see

But see S.E.C. v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc., 289 F.Supp. 3, 38 (S.D.N.Y.1968) (dictum), aff’d 435 F.2d 510 (2d Cir. 1970), questioned in Zeller v. Bogue Electric Manufacturing Corp., supra at 93,621 [cite to CCH] (“[t]he district court opinion contains dicta with which we would not agree, see 289 F.Supp. 3, 38 [S.D.N.Y.1968]”).

yellow Young v. Seaboard Corporation (1973)

But See · D. Utah · signal: but see

But see S.E.C. v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc., 289 F.Supp. 3, 38 (S.D.N.Y. 1968) (dictum), aff’d 435 F.2d 510 (2d Cir. 1970), questioned in Zeller v. Bogue Electric Manufacturing Corp., supra at 93,621 (“The district court opinion contains dicta with which we would not agree, see 289 F.Supp. 3, 38 [S.D.N.Y. 1968]”.

green Dan River, Inc. v. Icahn (1983)

Cited (see also) · 4th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., SEC v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc., 289 F.Supp. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff’d, 435 F.2d 510 (2d Cir.1970).

green Dan River, Inc. v. Icahn (1983)

Cited (see also) · 4th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., SEC v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc., 289 F.Supp. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1968), aff'd, 435 F.2d 510 (2d Cir.1970).

green Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,594 Milton Forman and Ellen Forman v. Community Services, Inc. (1974)

Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see also

See also SEC v. Fifth Avenue Coach Lines, Inc., 289 F.Supp. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1968) (note given for personal loan), aff'd without consideration of the point, 435 F.2d 510 (2d Cir. 1970).

green Glen R. Hadfield v. Ryan Equipment Company (1972)

Cited (see also) · 8th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

Appellee, however, took no cross-appeal from the district court decision, and it is well established that an appellee, in the absence of a cross-appeal, cannot “attack the [trial court’s] decree with a view either to enlarging his own rights thereunder or * * * lessening the rights of his adversary * * Morley Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co., 300 U.S. 185, 191 , 57 S.Ct. 325, 328 , 81 L.Ed. 593 (1937); see, e. g., Securities and Exchange Commission v. Fifth Avenue C…