Brizendine v. Visador Company (1970)
green
· 22 citation events
across 11 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197019982026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Bryant v. Technical Research Co. (1981)
Brizendine v. Visador Co., 437 F.2d 822, 825 (9th Cir. 1970); Shell Oil v. Gutierrez, 119 Ariz. 426 , 581 P.2d 271, 278 (App.1978).
green
Thomas A. Bryant and Linda Bryant, Husband and Wife v. Technical Research Company, a Foreign Corporation, Tec… (1981)
Brizendine v. Visador Co., 437 F.2d 822, 825 (9th Cir. 1970); Shell Oil v. Gutierrez, 119 Ariz. 426 , 581 P.2d 271, 278 (App.1978).
green
Pan-Alaska Fisheries, Inc., a Corporation, and Ids Leasing Corporation, Pan-Alaska Fisheries, Inc. v. Marine … (1977)
Cf. Brizendine v. Visador Company, 437 F.2d 822 (9th Cir. 1970) where, in a case dealing with Section 388 4 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, we held that a glass manufacturer-supplier's duty to warn (that certain glass was not safe for use in doors) "is not limited to warning the immediate purchaser." (437 F.2d at 828) 61 In this case Caterpillar built the D-343 engine on which it chose and mounted the 6L7440 filters.
green
Walker v. Preformed Line Products Co. (1984)
Brizendine v. Visador Co., 437 F.2d 822, 828 (9 Cir.1970).
green
In Re \Agent Orange\" Product Liability Litigation" (1984)
See, e.g., Brizendine v. Visador Co., 437 F.2d 822 (9th Cir.1970) (glass manufacturer held liable when it knew or should have known that strength B glass was unsafe for use in doors in high traffic areas and supplied such glass to frame manufacturers with knowledge that glass would be used for doors and that the frame manufacturers did not know of the dangers); State Steamship Co. v. Stone Manganese Marine, Ltd., 371 F.Supp. 500 (D.N.J.1973) (manufacturer of alloy ingots cou…