Wooten, Codiem Renoir (2013)
green
· 622 citation events
across 12 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201320192026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
yellow
Aurelio Escobar v. State (2018)
But see Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 609 (Tex. Crim.
“It is highly unlikely that a jury that had already rejected the appellant’s claim that he reasonably believed that deadly force was immediately necessary to defend himself would nevertheless find in his favor on the issue of sudden passion.”
green
Don Del Real Herrera v. the State of Texas (2023)
PENAL § 19.02(d); see Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 605 (Tex. Crim.
“The defendant has the burden of production and persuasion with respect to the issue of sudden passion.”
green
Carolyn Rodriguez v. the State of Texas (2026)
Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
DISCUSSION Lozano argues that the trial court erred when it refused to give a sudden passion instruction, and the error caused “some harm.” See Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
“If the error is preserved, the record must demonstrate that the appellant has suffered ‘some harm.’” (citations omitted)
green
Malcome Eldridge v. the State of Texas (2026)
Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Richard Lee Davis v. the State of Texas (2026)
App. 2022) (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Isaiah Renteria v. the State of Texas (2026)
App. 2022) (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Elvis MacK v. the State of Texas (2026)
Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Ray Canek Vera v. the State of Texas (2026)
Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 605 (Tex. Crim.
incorporating definitions of “sudden passion” and “adequate cause” set out in Tex. Penal Code § 19.02
green
K.C. v. D.R. (2026)
App. 2016); Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 605 (Tex. Crim.
green
Jason Jermaine Armster v. the State of Texas (2026)
A defendant is entitled to a sudden-passion instruction if the record “at least minimally” supports the following inferences: 1. that the defendant was acting under the immediate influence of passion, such as terror, anger, rage, or resentment; 23 2. that his sudden passion was in fact induced by some provocation by the deceased, which provocation would commonly produce such a passion in a person of ordinary temper; 3. that he committed the murder before regaining his capaci…
green
Marvin Rex Lake v. the State of Texas (2026)
Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Moises Galvan v. the State of Texas (2026)
App. 2022) (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Maria Rodriguez v. the State of Texas (2026)
App. 2022); Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Raven Robert Rodriguez v. the State of Texas (2026)
App. 2022) (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
App. 2022) (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
JB Johnson v. the State of Texas (2025)
Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Albert Gonzalez v. the State of Texas (2025)
If it is, then we must decide whether the appellant was harmed by the erroneous charge.” Id. (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Dietrich Jordan Thomas v. the State of Texas (2025)
Id. (citing Wooten v. 6 State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Justin Avery Clarabut v. the State of Texas (2025)
See Alkayyali, 713 S.W.3d at 789; Alcoser, 663 S.W.3d at 165; Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Chris CJ Martinez, Jr. v. the State of Texas (2025)
App. 2022) (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Yatanya Yachell Calhoun v. the State of Texas (2025)
If it is, then we must decide whether the appellant was harmed by the erroneous charge.” Id. (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim App. 2013)).
green
Jose Luiz Ramirez v. the State of Texas (2025)
If it is, then we must decide whether the appellant was harmed by the erroneous charge.” Id. (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Benedicto Cisnerosmartinez v. the State of Texas (2025)
Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Moises Galvan v. the State of Texas (2025)
App. 2022) (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Jesus Rodriguez v. the State of Texas (2025)
Id.; Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Sonny Contreras v. the State of Texas (2025)
App. 2022) (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Bradford Allen Thompson v. the State of Texas (2025)
App. 2015). 6 Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 605 (Tex. Crim.
green
Javon Davontae Elliston v. the State of Texas (2025)
App. 2022) (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Bryan Hucabee v. the State of Texas (2025)
Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
Alcoser, 663 S.W.3d at 165 (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Dequante Floyd Eleston v. the State of Texas (2024)
Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Edward Briceno v. the State of Texas (2024)
Herrera v. State, 676 S.W.3d 896 , 905 (Tex. App.—Eastland 2023, no pet.) (quoting Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 605 (Tex. Crim.
green
Timothy Duane Poor v. the State of Texas (2024)
App. 2022) (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Ricardo Marquez v. the State of Texas (2024)
Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 605 (Tex. Crim.
green
Bradford Vernon Blakeway v. the State of Texas (2024)
App. 2022) (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Cherry Jamila Payton v. the State of Texas (2024)
Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Bradford Vernon Blakeway v. the State of Texas (2024)
App. 2022) (citing Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Waymon Nicholas Jordan Jr. v. the State of Texas (2024)
See id.; Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
green
Darrick Carriere v. the State of Texas (2024)
Cf. Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 609 (Tex. Crim.
“It is highly unlikely that a jury that had already rejected the appellant’s claim that he reasonably believed that deadly force was immediately necessary to defend himself would nevertheless find in his favor on the issue of sudden passion.”
green
Shannon Labrice Williams v. the State of Texas (2021)
Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 607 (Tex. Crim.
“Finding our harm analysis thus dispositive, we need not address whether the trial court did, in fact, err not to include the instruction.”
green
Randall Jones v. State (2020)
Under the statute, a defendant relying on the issue of sudden passion must “raise the issue” and prove “the issue in the affirmative by a preponderance of the evidence.” See Tex. Penal Code § 19.02(d); see also Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 605 (Tex. Crim.
“The defendant has the burden of production and persuasion with respect to the issue of sudden passion.”
green
Deaira Pitts v. State (2020)
See Tex. Penal Code § 19.02(d) (“At the punishment stage of a trial, the defendant may raise the issue as to whether he caused the death under the immediate influence of sudden passion arising from an adequate cause.”); Wooten, 400 S.W.3d at 605 (“Under the current statutory scheme, the question of whether a defendant killed while under the immediate influence of sudden passion is a punishment issue.”).
“Under the current statutory scheme, the question of whether a defendant killed while under the immediate influence of sudden passion is a punishment issue.”
green
Carlos Ivan Delangelhernandez v. State (2020)
Wooten v. 4 State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 607 (Tex. Crim.
“Finding our harm analysis thus dispositive, we need not address whether the trial court did, in fact, err not to include the instruction.”
green
Ricardo Lara Martinez v. State (2019)
Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 606 (Tex. Crim.
“Harm does not emanate from the mere failure to include the requested instruction.”
green
Arthur Roberts v. State (2018)
See Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 607 (Tex. Crim.
“Finding our harm analysis thus dispositive, we need not address whether the trial court did, in fact, err not to include the instruction.”
green
Brandon Ivory Johnson v. State (2018)
See Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 607 (Tex. Crim.
“Finding our harm analysis thus dispositive, we need not address whether the trial court did, in fact, err not to include the instruction.”
green
Romon J. Henderson v. State (2017)
See Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 607 (Tex. Crim.
“Finding our harm analysis thus dispositive, we need not address whether the trial court did, in fact, err not to include the instruction.”
green
Richard D. Donaldson v. State (2016)
App. 2016) (affirming court of appeals’s decision that assumed without deciding that jury instructions were erroneous and that then performed harm analysis); see also Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 607 (Tex. Crim.
“Finding our harm analysis thus dispositive, we need not address whether the trial court did, in fact, err not to include the instruction.”
green
Sarah Jean Clement v. State (2016)
App. 2004) (affirming court of appeals’s decision that assumed arguendo that trial court erred by refusing to exclude evidence of exact description of appellant’s prior crime during guilt-innocence and that then performed harm analysis); see also Wooten v. State, 400 S.W.3d 601, 607 (Tex. Crim.
“Finding our harm analysis thus dispositive, we need not address whether the trial court did, in fact, err not to include the instruction.”