Cortez, Damien Hernandez (2015)
green
· 256 citation events
across 6 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201520202026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Vandamme Jeanty v. the State of Texas (2023)
The Indictment’s Amendment To convict a defendant of fraudulent use or possession of identifying information, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant “(1) obtain[ed], possesse[d], transfer[red], or use[d] an item of identifying information of another person; (2) without the other person’s consent; and (3) with the intent to harm or defraud.” Sanchez v. State, 536 S.W.3d 919 , 921 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2017, no pet.) (citing Tex. Penal Code …
green
Marco Rodriguez v. the State of Texas (2024)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 602 (Tex. Crim.
green
Brenda Delgado v. the State of Texas (2021)
“Appellate review of claims of jury-charge error first involves a determination of whether the charge was erroneous and, if it was, then second, an appellate court conducts a harm analysis, with the standard of review for harm being dependent on whether error was preserved for appeal.” Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Jose Roberto Lopez v. the State of Texas (2026)
See id. at 598 (“Because we conclude that the charge was not erroneous in this case, we do not conduct a harm analysis.”).
“Because we conclude that the charge was not erroneous in this case, we do not conduct a harm analysis.”
green
Joseph Jerome Davila v. the State of Texas (2026)
Jackson v. State, No. 05-15-00414-CR, 2016 WL 4010067 , at *8 (Tex. App.—Dallas July 22, 2016, no pet.) (mem. op.) (citing Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Bodden, Derek Andrew (2024)
In our prior decision in Cortez v. State, we determined that “item” in this context means “any single piece of personal, identifying information . . . that alone or in conjunction with other information identifies a person, as opposed to a thing that may contain a group of pieces of information identifying a person, such as a license, credit card, or document.” 469 S.W.3d 593, 602 (Tex. Crim.
green
April Loreace Williams v. the State of Texas (2024)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Christopher George Vega v. the State of Texas (2024)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
William David Cruthird, III v. the State of Texas (2023)
Pruett, 510 S.W.3d at 927 ; Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Manuel Mata v. the State of Texas (2026)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Robert Speed v. the State of Texas (2025)
Authority “Appellate review of claims of jury-charge error first involves a determination of whether the charge was erroneous and, if it was, then second, an appellate court conducts a harm analysis, with the standard of review for harm being dependent on whether error was preserved for appeal.” Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Victor Manuel Gonzalez v. the State of Texas (2025)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Johnathan Leland Estes v. the State of Texas (2025)
Authority “Appellate review of claims of jury-charge error first involves a determination of whether the charge was erroneous and, if it was, then second, an appellate court conducts a harm analysis, with the standard of review for harm being dependent on whether error was preserved for appeal.” Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Bradford Allen Thompson v. the State of Texas (2025)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Dexter Black v. the State of Texas (2025)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Joseph James Kutney III v. the State of Texas (2025)
AUTHORITY “Appellate review of claims of jury-charge error first involves a determination of whether the charge was erroneous and, if it was, then second, an appellate court conducts a harm analysis, with the standard of review for harm being dependent on whether error was preserved for appeal.” Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Troy E. Hollins v. the State of Texas (2024)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Christian Lozano v. the State of Texas (2024)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Timothy Michael Geng v. the State of Texas (2024)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
citing Kirsch, 357 S.W.3d at 649
green
Donaldson v. Lumpkin (2024)
In Comal County, 7 See Ex parte Cortez, 469 S.W.3d 593, 602 (Tex. Crim.
finding the phrase “item of identifying information” found in § 32.51(b)(1) refers to any single piece of personal, identifying information enumerated in § 32.51(a
green
Alberto Torres v. the State of Texas (2024)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Carrendius Walker v. the State of Texas (2024)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Joe Starks Jr. v. the State of Texas (2024)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Walter Henry Paterson v. the State of Texas (2024)
App. P. 33.1. 32Id. 33Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Johnny Lance Dean Acuff v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Landon Johnson v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. 6 State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Don Del Real Herrera v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
citing Kirsch, 357 S.W.3d at 649
green
Rey Arevalo v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
citing Kirsch, 4 357 S.W.3d at 649
green
Jose Gustavo Garcia-Rodriguez v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Brian Rollins v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Courtney Chelle Rice v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Gorge Luis Olmos v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Robert Lafayette Lovell v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
citing Kirsch, 357 S.W.3d at 649
green
Donovan Jacob Farr v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 604 (Tex. Crim.
green
Hudson Borgella v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 599 (Tex. Crim.
green
Johnny Ray Coleman v. the State of Texas (2023)
We review claims of charge error using a two-step process. 36 When evaluating charge error, we must first determine whether an error occurred. 37 If an error occurred, we then apply the appropriate harm analysis depending on whether the error was properly preserved by the defendant in the trial. 38 And determining whether harm resulted from an error in a charge is measured by a “some harm” standard if the defendant objected to the error in the court below, but by another sta…
green
Salar Baban v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Carlos Edmond Barnes v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Andrew Timothy Martinez v. the State of Texas (2023)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
citing Kirsch, 357 S.W.3d at 649
green
William Clifford Goble, Jr. v. the State of Texas (2022)
Id. (citing Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Jesus Albino Rodriguez v. the State of Texas (2022)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
citing Kirsch, 357 S.W.3d at 649
green
James Lewis Coquat v. the State of Texas (2022)
See Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
“Because we conclude that the charge was not erroneous in this case, we do not conduct a harm analysis.”
green
Kevoughn Dontrell Fields v. the State of Texas (2022)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Traci Lee Alaniz v. the State of Texas (2022)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
citing Kirsch, 357 S.W.3d at 649
green
Vanessa Lucillle Alexander v. the State of Texas (2022)
“The purpose of the trial court’s jury charge is to instruct the jurors on all of the law applicable to the case.” Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Amir Ali Sharif v. the State of Texas (2022)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Adam James Edmond Demirs v. the State of Texas (2022)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Regina Long v. the State of Texas (2022)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Victor Omoleme v. the State of Texas (2021)
Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
green
Pedro Pablo Pena, Jr. v. State (2021)
See Cortez v. State, 469 S.W.3d 593, 598 (Tex. Crim.
“Because Pena v. State Page 6 we conclude that the charge was not erroneous in this case, we do not conduct a harm analysis.”