James Darwin Autry v. J. C. Wiley, Rear Admiral, Usn Etc. (1971)

green · 20 citation events across 10 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 8

Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

197119982026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green United States v. Georgiadis (2016)

Rule Authority · 1st Cir.

But we have previously made clear that Rauscher applies to “situations where an American court tries the fugitive for a crime other than the one for which extradition was granted.” Autry v. Wiley, 440 F.2d 799, 801 (1st Cir.1971); see Rauscher, 119 U.S. at 424 , 7 S.Ct. 234 (explaining that an extradited defendant has a right to “be tried only for the offense with which he is charged in the extradition proceedings, and for which he was delivered up”).

green United States v. Josephine Cordero, Etc., United States of America v. William Sorren, A/K/A Bill (1982)

Rule Authority · 1st Cir.

See also Palmigiano v. Houle, 618 F.2d 877 , 878 n.1 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 901 , 101 S.Ct. 272 , 66 L.Ed.2d 132 (1980); Autry v. Wiley, 440 F.2d 799, 801 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 886 , 92 S.Ct. 219 , 30 L.Ed.2d 169 (1971). 8 .

green United States v. Robert Morris Postal, Salem L. Forsythe, and George A. Chitty (1979)

Rule Authority · 5th Cir.

This proposition, the so-called Ker-Frisbie doctrine, is equally valid where the illegality results from a breach of international law not codified in a treaty. 16 United States v. Cadena, 585 F.2d 1252,1259-60 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Winter, 509 F.2d at 988-89 ; Autry v. Wiley, 440 F.2d 799, 802 (1st Cir. 1971); see United States v. Quesada; United States v. Lopez, 542 F.2d 283 (5th Cir. 1976) (per curiam).

green Extraterritorial Apprehension by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (1980)

Rule Authority · OLC

United States v. Mariano. 537 F.2d at 271 . 9 E.g., Postal, 589 F.2d at 873 (“This proposition, the so-called Ker-Frisbie doctrine, is equally valid where the illegality results from a breach of international law not codified in a treaty"); United States v. Cadena. 585 F.2d 1252, 1261 (5th Cir. 1978) United States v. Winter, 509 F.2d 975, 984-86 (5th Cir.), cert, denied. 423 U.S. 825 (1975) (Ker-Frisbie doctrine makes it unnecessary to inquire whether arrest by Coast Guard w…

green United States v. F/V TAIYO MARU, NUMBER 28, SOI 600 (1975)

Rule Authority · D. Me.

As stated in Autry v. Wiley, 440 F.2d 799 (1st Cir. 1971), the Cook doctrine is a “narrow” exception to the general rule; it “applies only to violations of a specific territorial jurisdictional circumscription set by treaty.” Id. at 802.

green Fiocconi v. Attorney General of the United States (1972)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

See, e. g., Johnson v. Browne, 205 U.S. 309, 317 , 27 S.Ct. 539 , 51 L.Ed. 810 (1907) ; Cosgrove v. Winney, 174 U.S. 64, 68 , 19 S.Ct. 598 , 43 L.Ed. 897 (1899) ; Lascalles v. Georgia, 148 U.S. 537, 542-543 , 13 S.Ct. 687 , 37 L.Ed. 549 (1893) ; Ker v. Illinois, 119 U.S. 436, 443 , 7 S.Ct. 225 , 30 L.Ed. 421 (1886) ; Autry v. Wiley, 440 F.2d 799, 801 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 880 , 92 S.Ct. 219 , 30 L.Ed.2d 169 (1971) ; Chandler v. United States, 171 F.2d 921 (1st C…

green United States v. Albert Green (1982)

Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see

Frisbie v. Coilins, 342 U.S. 519 , 72 S.Ct. 509 , 96 L.Ed. 541 (1952); Ker v. Illinois, 119 U.S. 436 , 7 S.Ct. 225 , 30 L.Ed. 421 (1886); see Autry v. Wiley, 440 F.2d 799, 801-02 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 886 , 92 S.Ct. 219 , 30 L.Ed.2d 169 (1971).

green United States v. Deaton (1978)

Cited · N.D. Ohio · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Autry v. Wiley, 440 F.2d 799 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 886 , 92 S.Ct. 219 , 30 L.Ed.2d 169 (1971).