How cited: Cluster 296317 · Go Syfert

Cluster 296317 (1969)

green · 96 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 15 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
196919972026
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir. · 11 citations in this opinion
In fact, this court, in Cities of Statesville v. Atomic Energy Commission, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 272, 282-286 , 441 F.2d 962, 972-76 (1969) (en banc), held that, under the pre-1970 Act, the Commission was not permitted to consider antitrust matters in issuing section 104(b) licenses.
en banc
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir. · 10 citations in this opinion
In fact, this court, in Cities of Statesville v. Atomic Energy Commission, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 272, 282-286 , 441 F.2d 962, 972-76 (1969) (en banc), held that, under the pre-1970 Act, the Commission was not permitted to consider antitrust matters in issuing section 104(b) licenses.
en banc
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Cities of Statesville v. Atomic Energy Comm., 142 U.S.App.D.C. 272, 297 , 441 F.2d 962, 987 (1969) (en banc) (Leventhal, J., concurring).
en banc
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir.
This court has long taken the position that "an agency 'should be accorded broad discretion in establishing and applying rules for * * * public participation * * *.' " Cities of Statesville, supra, 441 F.2d at 977, quoting United Church of Christ, supra, 359 F.2d at 1005-1006 , and responsible use of that discretion should make unnecessary the complete exclusion of public participation.
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir.
This court has long taken the position that “an agency ‘should be accorded broad discretion in establishing and applying rules for * * * public participation * * *.’ ” Cities of Statesville, supra, 441 F.2d at 977, quoting United Church of Christ, supra, 359 F.2d at 1005-1006 , and responsible use of that discretion should make unnecessary the complete exclusion of public participation.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
The court in Cities of Statesville v. Atomic Energy Commission, 441 F.2d 962, 975 (D.C.Cir.1969) (en banc), remarked that the AEC "concerns itself not with economic feasibility but with practical development and application of (nuclear) energy." And in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 435 U.S. 519, 550 , 98 S.Ct. 1197, 1215 , 55 L.Ed.2d 460 (1978), the Supreme Court cited section 274(k) for the proposition that "(t)here is little…
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
The court in Cities of Statesville v. Atomic Energy Commission, 441 F.2d 962, 975 (D.C.Cir.1969) (en banc), remarked that the AEC “concerns itself not with economic feasibility but with practical development and application of [nuclear] energy.” And in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 435 U.S. 519, 550 , 98 S.Ct. 1197, 1215 , 55 L.Ed.2d 460 (1978), the Supreme Court cited section 274(k) for the proposition that “[t]here is little…
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir.
441 F.2d 962 15 A.L.R.Fed. 552, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 272 , 82 P.U.R.3d 271 CITIES OF STATESVILLE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION and United States of America, Respondents, Duke Power Company, Intervenor.
Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio
See Alabama Power Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 511 F.2d 383, 393 (D.C.Cir.1974); Cities of Statesville v. Atomic Energy Commission, 441 F.2d 962, 986-87 (D.C.Cir.1969) (Leventhal, J., concurring); Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission, 399 F.2d 953, 960 (D.C.
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Cities of Statesville v. Atomic Energy Comm’n, supra note 110, 142 U.S.App.D.C. at 287 , 441 F.2d at 977 ; City of San Antonio v. CAB, supra note 109, 126 U.S.App.D.C. at 118, 119 , 374 F.2d at 332, 333; Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference v. FPC, supra note 110, 354 F.2d at 617. .
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion
See Cities of Statesville, et al. v. Atomic Energy Commission, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 272 , 441 F.2d 962 (en banc, 1969).
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Cities of Statesville, 441 F.2d at 977.
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Cities of Statesville, 441 F.2d at 977.
Cited (see also) · D.C. Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. FCC, 652 F.2d 72 , 81-88, 102-03 (D.C.Cir.1980) (FCC must consider antitrust concerns in assessing public interest, but even under its entry-restricting enabling statute focus is on protection of competition, not competitors); see also Cities of Statesville v. Atomic Energy Commission, 441 F.2d 962, 986-87 (D.C.Cir.1969) (en banc) (Leventhal, J., concurring) (“administration of federal regulatory statutes calling for determinations of the public interest…
Cited · W.D. Pa. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Cities of Statesville v. Atomic Energy Commission, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 272 , 441 F.2d 962 (1969), in which Judge Leventhal, writing in dissent, observed that, “The decisions of the Supreme Court and this court over a period of at least 25 years have evolved and defined a substantial jurisprudence making clear that the administration of federal regulatory statutes calling for determinations of the public interest establish the authority, and in some instances the duty, of th…