How cited: United States v. Ali Darwich · Go Syfert

United States v. Ali Darwich (2014)

green · 10 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
United States v. Darwich, 574 Fed.Appx. 582, 592 (6th Cir. 2014).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
The government bears the burden of proving the defendant breached the agreement, and that the breach was “material and substantial,” as opposed to “an inadvertent omission or oversight.” United States v. Darwich, 574 Fed.Appx. 582, 592 (6th Cir. 2014) (quoting Fitch, 964 F.2d at 574 ).
quoting Fitch, 964 F.2d at 574
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
United States v. Darwich, 574 Fed.Appx. 582, 590-91 (6th Cir.2014); Spu rling v. Allstate Indem.
green DARWICH v. SPAULDING (2022)
Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.
United States v. Darwich, 574 F. App’x 582, 584 (6th Cir. 2014).
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., United States v. Darwich, 574 F. App’x 582, 595 (6th Cir. 2014); United States v. Miller, 371 F. App’x 646 , 648–49 (6th Cir. 2010); see also United States v. Pacheco, 466 F. App’x 517, 522 (6th Cir. 2012) (finding no abuse of discretion in denying CJA funds where the defendant received other resources allowing him to raise a plausible defense); United States v. Jamieson, 427 F.3d 394, 408 (6th Cir. 2005) (same).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Darwich, 574 F. App’x 582 (6th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, 574 U.S. 1200 (2015).
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Darwich, 574 F. App’x 582, 594 (6th Cir. 2014).
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see also
Miller v. United States, 561 F. App’x 485, 489 (6th Cir. 2014) (quoting United States v. Dinitz, 538 F.2d 1214, 1219 (5th Cir. 1976)); see also United States v. Darwich, No. 19-1116 United States v. Igboba Page 15 574 F. App’x 582 , 588 n.6 (6th Cir. 2014).