How cited: Sassone v. Commissioner of Social Security · Go Syfert

Sassone v. Commissioner of Social Security (2006)

green · 22 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201320192026
green Rosario Rivera v. Saul (2021)
Rule Authority · M.D. Penn. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sec., 165 F. App’x 954, 958 (3d Cir. 2006).
green Holley v. Colvin (2013)
Rule Authority · D.N.J. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sec., 165 Fed.Appx. 954, 955 (3d Cir.2006) (citing Blalock, 483 F.2d at 775 ).
Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.
Sec., 165 F. App’x 954, 955 (3d Cir. 2006) (citing Blalock v. Richardson, 483 F.2d 773, 775 (4th Cir. 1972) (“The fact that the record as a whole might support an inconsistent conclusion is immaterial, for the language of § 205(g) precludes a de novo judicial proceeding and requires that the court uphold the Secretary’s decision even should the court disagree with such decision as long as it is supported by substantial evidence.” (internal footnotes and citations omitted)). …
citing Blalock v. Richardson, 483 F.2d 773, 775 (4th Cir. 1972) (“The fact that the record as a whole might support an inconsistent conclusion is immaterial, for the language of § 205(g
green TAYLOR v. KIJAKAZI (2024)
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Sec., 165 F. App’x 954, 955 (3d Cir. 2006).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 165 F. App’x 954, 958 (3d Cir. 2006).
green Gbur v. Saul (2023)
Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.
Sec., 165 Fed.
green Brandt v. Kijakazi (2023)
Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.
Sec., 165 F. App'x 954, 958 (3d Cir. 2006).
green Kramer v. Saul (2022)
Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.
Sec., 165 F. App'x 954, 958 (3d Cir. 2006).
green Philhower v. Saul (2022)
Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.
Sec., 165 F. App'x 954, 958 (3d Cir. 2006).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 165 F. App'x 954, 959 (3d Cir. 2006) (noting that Burnett does not “require an ALJ to use ‘magic words’ in his analysis”).
noting that Burnett does not “require an ALJ to use ‘magic words’ in his analysis”
green SPANO v. KIJAKAZI (2022)
Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.
Sec., 165 Fed.
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 165 F. App'x 954, 960 (3d Cir. 2006) (affirming the ALJ’s decision where “the ALJ implicitly addressed in the negative each of the requirements of [a particular listing]”).
affirming the ALJ’s decision where “the ALJ implicitly addressed in the negative each of the requirements of [a particular listing]”
green Newton v. Saul (2020)
Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.
Sec., 165 F. App’x 954, 961 (3d Cir. 2006)).