Sassone v. Commissioner of Social Security (2006)
green
· 22 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 13 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2013 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201320192026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Rosario Rivera v. Saul (2021)
Sec., 165 F. App’x 954, 958 (3d Cir. 2006).
green
Holley v. Colvin (2013)
Sec., 165 Fed.Appx. 954, 955 (3d Cir.2006) (citing Blalock, 483 F.2d at 775 ).
green
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security (2025)
Sec., 165 F. App’x 954, 955 (3d Cir. 2006) (citing Blalock v. Richardson, 483 F.2d 773, 775 (4th Cir. 1972) (“The fact that the record as a whole might support an inconsistent conclusion is immaterial, for the language of § 205(g) precludes a de novo judicial proceeding and requires that the court uphold the Secretary’s decision even should the court disagree with such decision as long as it is supported by substantial evidence.” (internal footnotes and citations omitted)). …
citing Blalock v. Richardson, 483 F.2d 773, 775 (4th Cir. 1972) (“The fact that the record as a whole might support an inconsistent conclusion is immaterial, for the language of § 205(g
green
TAYLOR v. KIJAKAZI (2024)
Sec., 165 F. App’x 954, 955 (3d Cir. 2006).
green
STEWART v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (2024)
Sec., 165 F. App’x 954, 958 (3d Cir. 2006).
green
Gbur v. Saul (2023)
Sec., 165 Fed.
green
Brandt v. Kijakazi (2023)
Sec., 165 F. App'x 954, 958 (3d Cir. 2006).
green
Kramer v. Saul (2022)
Sec., 165 F. App'x 954, 958 (3d Cir. 2006).
green
Philhower v. Saul (2022)
Sec., 165 F. App'x 954, 958 (3d Cir. 2006).
green
MELENDEZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (2022)
Sec., 165 F. App'x 954, 959 (3d Cir. 2006) (noting that Burnett does not “require an ALJ to use ‘magic words’ in his analysis”).
noting that Burnett does not “require an ALJ to use ‘magic words’ in his analysis”
green
SPANO v. KIJAKAZI (2022)
Sec., 165 Fed.
green
BROWN IV v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (2022)
Sec., 165 F. App'x 954, 960 (3d Cir. 2006) (affirming the ALJ’s decision where “the ALJ implicitly addressed in the negative each of the requirements of [a particular listing]”).
affirming the ALJ’s decision where “the ALJ implicitly addressed in the negative each of the requirements of [a particular listing]”
green
Newton v. Saul (2020)
Sec., 165 F. App’x 954, 961 (3d Cir. 2006)).