Norman A. Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., Norman A. Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co. (1973)

green · 74 citation events across 27 courts. Showing the 29 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 29

Treatment trajectory · 1974 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then

197420002026

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Helen C. Carras and Bill G. Carras, Co-Executors of the Estate of Gus N. Carras, Deceased v. James S. Burns, … (1975)

Rule Authority · 4th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 373-74 (1st Cir. 1973); Hecht v. Harris, Upham & Co., 283 F.Supp. 417, 432 (N.D.Cal.1968), aff’d, 430 F.2d 1202 (9th Cir. 1970).

green Robert Shad, Molly Shad, and Samantha Shad v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., a Corporation Milton Ponitz and Lee… (1986)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 374 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1002 , 94 S.Ct. 356 , 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973); Booth v. Peavey Company Commodity Services, 430 F.2d 132, 135 (8th Cir.1970).

green Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,517 Charles A. Tiernan v. Blyth, Eastman, Dillon & Co. (1983)

Rule Authority · 1st Cir.

Friedman & Co. Commodities, 688 F.2d 1193,1203 (8th Cir.1982); Follansbee v. Davis, Skaggs & Co., Inc., 681 F.2d 673, 676-77 (9th Cir.1982); Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 373-74 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1002 , 94 S.Ct. 356 , 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973).

green Xaphes v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (1986)

Rule Authority · D. Me. · 4 citations in this opinion

Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 373, n. 10 (1st Cir.1973).

green Mauriber v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. (1983)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y. · 2 citations in this opinion

Miley v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., 637 F.2d 318, 324 (5th Cir.1981); Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 373-74 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1002 , 94 S.Ct. 356 , 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973).

green Securities & Exchange Commission v. Pinez (1997)

Rule Authority · D. Mass.

Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 372 (1st Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1002 , 94 S.Ct. 356 , 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973); cf. Graham v. White-Phillips Co., 296 U.S. 27, 32 , 56 S.Ct. 21, 23 , 80 L.Ed. 20 (1935) (holding that one who is willfully blind to notice of defect in title is not acting in good faith under holder in due course statute).

green Vogel v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. (1990)

Rule Authority · Mo. Ct. App.

Costello v. Oppenheimer & Co., 711 F.2d 1361, 1368 (7th Cir.1983); Mihara v. Dean Witter & Co., 619 F.2d 814, 820-21 (9th Cir.1980) (violation of the general antifraud provisions of § 10(b), Securities Exchange Act of 1934, *750 15 U.S.C.A. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 of SEC, 17 C.F.R. § 240 .10b-5); Hecht, 430 F.2d at 1206 ; Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 368 (1st Cir.1973), cert. den. 414 U.S. 1002 , 94 S.Ct. 356 , 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973); reh. den. 415 U.S. 960…

green Verrecchia v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis (1982)

Rule Authority · D.P.R. · signal: cf.

Cf. Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 370 (1 Cir.1973).

green Maryville Academy v. Loeb Rhoades & Co., Inc. (1981)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.

But the parties agree that this section also requires proof of proximate cause, e.g., Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 370 (1st Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1002 , 94 S.Ct. 356 , 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973).

green Palmer v. Thomson & McKinnon Auchincloss, Inc. (1977)

Rule Authority · D. Conn.

Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 371 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1002 , 94 S.Ct. 356 , 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973). 21 .

green Miami Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner (1977)

Rule Authority

See Gordon v. duPont Glore Forgan, Inc., 487 F.2d 1260 , 1261 and n. 1 (5th Cir. 1973); Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 369 (1st Cir. 1973).

green Freeman v. Marine Midland Bank-New York (1976)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y

Two leading cases holding that a bank is entitled to a return of the principal are Goldman v. Bank of Commonwealth, 467 F.2d 439, 446 (6th Cir. 1972), and Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 372 (1st Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1002 , 94 S.Ct. 356 , 38 L.Ed.2d 237 .

green Newman v. Pershing & Co., Inc. (1975)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

There has been a conspicuous lack of judicial enthusiasm for the doctrine thus incorporated when there has been performance by the violator; the reasons are clearly set forth in Bruce’s Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co., 330 U.S. 743, 752-757 , 67 S.Ct. 1015 , 91 L.Ed. 1219 (1947), and Kelly v. Kosuga, 358 U.S. 516, 519-21 , 79 S.Ct. 429 , 3 L.Ed.2d 475 (1959).” 5 Similarly, the Court in Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 370 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 100…

green Teitelbaum v. Scranton National Bank (1974)

Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.

Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 370 (1st Cir. 1973); Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, 429 F.2d 1136, 1140 (2d Cir. 1970); Goldenberg v. Bache & Co., 270 F.2d 675, 680 (5th Cir. 1959); Livingston v. Weis, Voisin, Cannon, Inc., 294 F.Supp. 676, 681 (D.N.J.1968); Remar v. Clayton Securities Corp., 81 F.Supp. 1014, 1017 (D.Mass.1949).

green Merrill Karlen v. Ray E. Friedman & Company Commodities, Rosemary Karlen, Trustee for the Karlen Boys' Trust … (1982)

Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 373-374 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1002 (1973); Hecht v. Harris, Upham & Co., supra, 283 F.Supp. at 433 . 57 Margulies clearly exercised sufficient control over Karlen's account to establish a churning claim; in fact, his control was nearly total as evidenced by several facts.

green Karlen v. Ray E. Friedman & Co. Commodities (1982)

Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 373-374 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1002 (1973); Hecht v. Harris, Upham & Co., supra, 283 F.Supp. at 433 .

green Arceneaux v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (1985)

Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see

See Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1002 , 94 S.Ct. 356 , 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973).

green Arceneaux v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (1985)

Cited · 11th Cir. · signal: see

See Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1002 , 94 S.Ct. 356 , 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973).

green Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,254 Thomas F. Costello, Cross-Appellant v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., Cross-Appellee (1983)

Cited (see also) · 7th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 374 (1st Cir. 1973); Booth v. Peavey Company Commodity Services, 430 F.2d 132,135 (8th Cir.1970).

green Samuel STERN, Appellant, v. MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH, INC., Appellee (1979)

Cited (see also) · 4th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e. g., Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365 (1st Cir. 1973); Spoon v. Walston & Co., 478 F.2d 246 (6th Cir. 1973); Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, 429 F.2d 1136 (2d Cir. 1970). .

green Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross (1977)

Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., supra, 473 F.2d at 374 ; Note, supra, 80 Harv.L.Rev. at 875.

green Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross (1977)

Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., supra, 473 F.2d at 374 ; Note, supra, 80 Harv.L.Rev. at 875.

green Dufoe v. DraftKings Inc. (2024)

Cited · D. Mass. · signal: see

Cooperativa Ahorro y Credito Aguada v. Kidder, Peabody & Co., 777 F. Supp. 153 , 156–57 (D.P.R. 1991); see Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365 , 368 n.1 (1st Cir. 1973) (noting that “[c]hurning may give rise to a civil cause of action under either § 10(b) or § 15(c) of the Securities Exchange Act”); Sheldon v. Vermonty, 204 F.R.D. 679, 684 (D.

noting that “[c]hurning may give rise to a civil cause of action under either § 10(b) or § 15(c) of the Securities Exchange Act”

green Landegger v. Cohen (2013)

Cited · D. Colo. · signal: see

As Plaintiff points out that prior to 1975 a private cause of action had been recognized by some courts under Section 15: see Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365 , 368 n. 1 (1st Cir.1973), Davis v. Avco Corp., 371 F.Supp. 782, 789 (N.D.Ohio 1974), and Opper v. Hancock Securities Corp., 367 F.2d 157, 158 (2nd Cir.1966). 14 Because of these cases, Plaintiff contends that the contemporary legal context allows this Court to more readily infer Congressional intent suppo…

green Sheldon v. Vermonty (2001)

Cited (see also) · D. Kan. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365 , 368 n. 1 (1st Cir.1973) (recognizing that claim for churning is an actionable civil cause of action under section 15(c)(1)); Davis v. Avco Corp., 371 F.Supp. 782, 789 (N.D.Ohio 1974) (plaintiff may sue unregistered broker or dealer under section 15).

plaintiff may sue unregistered broker or dealer under section 15

green Cooperativa Ahorro Y Credito Aguada v. Kidder, Peabody & Co. (1991)

Cited · D.P.R. · signal: see

See Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1002 , 94 S.Ct. 356 , 38 L.Ed.2d 237 (1973); Gilman v. Shearson/American Express, Inc., 577 F.Supp. 492 (D.N.H.1983), which rule a private right of action exists.

green Palmer v. Thomson & McKinnon Auchincloss, Inc. (1979)

Cited · D. Conn. · signal: see

See id. at 371 .

green Rolf v. Blyth Eastman Dillon & Co., Inc. (1977)

Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see

See Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365 (1st Cir. 1973).

green Neill v. David A. Noyes & Co. (1976)

Cited (see also) · N.D. Ill. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e. g., Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Company, 473 F.2d 365, 370 (1st Cir. 1973).