How cited: Cluster 312266 · Go Syfert

Cluster 312266 (1973)

green · 21 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 13 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197319992026
Rule Authority · SCOTUS · 2 citations in this opinion
I believe that this admission is sufficient to satisfy the liberal willfulness requirement of the FLSA." Donovan v. Richland Shoe Co., 623 F. Supp. 667, 671 (ED Pa. 1985). [10] See, e. g., Coleman v. Jiffy June Farms, Inc., 458 F. 2d 1139, 1142 (CA5 1971), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 948 (1972); Brennan v. Heard, 491 F. 2d 1, 3 (CA5 1974); Marshall v. Union Pacific Motor Freight Co., 650 F. 2d 1085, 1091-1093 (CA9 1981); Marshall v. Erin Food Services, Inc., 672 F. 2d 229, 231 (…
willful violation after two prior warnings and unkept promises of compliance
green Turner v. Brock (1987)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Hodgson v. Cactus Craft of Arizona, 481 F.2d 464, 466 (9th Cir.1973).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Hodgson v. Cactus Craft of Arizona, 481 F.2d 464, 466 (9th Cir.1973).
Rule Authority · D. Ariz.
Ariz. Oct. 16, 2009) (citing Hodgson v. Cactus Craft of Ariz., 481 F.2d 464, 467 (9th Cir. 1973)). 1 against Defendants.
Rule Authority · D.D.C. · signal: cf.
Cf. Hodgson v. Cactus Craft of Arizona, 481 F.2d 464, 467 (9th Cir. 1973) (occupations involved in the operation of power-driven woodworking machines).
occupations involved in the operation of power-driven woodworking machines
Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See e.g., Hodgson v. Cactus Craft of Arizona, 481 F.2d 464, 466 (9th Cir.1973) (court found no guaranteed minimum salary but only hourly wage); Craig v. Far West Engineering Co., 265 F.2d 251, 257-58 (9th Cir.) (considering guarantee under Sec. 207(e)), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 816 , 80 S.Ct. 57 , 4 L.Ed.2d 63 (1959) 9 The Secretary also relies on the fact that the casino did not change its pay practices even after the Secretary declared them improper.
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see
See Hodgson v. Cactus Craft of Arizona, 481 F.2d 464, 466 (9th Cir.1973).
Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Rosenwasser, 323 U.S. 360, 361 , 65 S.Ct. 295, 296 , 89 L.Ed. 301 (1945) 10 See e.g., Hodgson v. Cactus Craft of Arizona, 481 F.2d 464, 467 (9th Cir.1973) (persons who manufacture novelty and souvenir gift items in their homes and are compensated at a piece rate are entitled to the minimum wage under the FLSA); Silent Woman, Ltd. v. Donovan, 585 F.Supp. 447, 451 (E.D.Wis.1984) (persons who do needlework in their homes for a corporation, set their own hou…
Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See e.g., Hodgson v. Cactus Craft of Arizona, 481 F.2d 464, 467 (9th Cir.1973) (persons who manufacture novelty and souvenir gift items in their homes and are compensated at a piece rate are entitled to the minimum wage under the FLSA); Silent Woman, Ltd. v. Donovan, 585 F.Supp. 447, 451 (E.D.Wis.1984) (persons who do needlework in their homes for a corporation, set their own hours, and are compensated at a piece rate set by the corporation are "employees" under the FLSA); H…
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Hodgson v. Cactus Craft of Arizona, 481 F.2d 464, 467 (9th Cir. 1973), where this court held that willfulness was established where two prior investigations resulted in warnings which were ignored by the employer. 15 .
Cited (see also) · D. Haw. · signal: see also
Id. at 185 ; see also Hodgson v. Cactus Craft of Ariz., 481 F.2d 464, 466 (9th Cir. 1973) (affirming as not clearly erroneous trial court’s findings that employees were paid on an hourly basis, despite employer’s claims that they were salaried).
affirming as not clearly erroneous trial court’s findings that employees were paid on an hourly basis, despite employer’s claims that they were salaried
Cited (see also) · W.D.N.C. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Hodgson v. Cactus Craft of Arizona, 481 F.2d 464 (9th Cir.1973) (power-driven woodworking machine); Goldberg v. Fritschy, supra, 198 F.Supp. 743 (motor vehicle driver and helper); Mitchell v. Thaxton, 13 Wage-Hour Cases 575 (N.D.Ga.1958) (power-driven woodworking machines).
Cited (see also) · D.R.I. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e. g., Hodgson v. Cactus Craft of Arizona, 481 F.2d 464 (9th Cir. 1973); Hodgson v. Eunice Superette, Inc., 368 F.Supp. 639 (W.D.La.1973); Brennan v. S & M Enterprises, 362 F.Supp. 595 (D.D.C.1973).