Prough v. Madison County (2013)

green · 10 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 7

Sort: By significance · Most recent

green Andrade v. The City of Kankakee (2023)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

See, e.g., Lacey, 232 Ill. 2d at 368 (section 4-102 absolute immunity applied to a claim that police failed to protect a woman experiencing domestic abuse who was later murdered by her abuser); Wisnasky, 2020 IL App (5th) 170418, ¶ 50 (section 4-102 absolute immunity applied to the claim brought by estate of a family killed at a railroad crossing that the municipality provided inadequate crowd control and traffic management); Wright-Young v. Chicago State University, 2019 IL…

green Glover v. City of Chicago (2023)

Rule Authority · Ill. App. Ct.

Payne, 2014 IL App (1st) 123010, ¶¶ 1, 3-11 (applying section 4-102 where, during a protective mental health detention, police failed to prevent a man experiencing a drug-induced psychotic episode from leaping from a second story window); Rodriguez v. Village of Park Forest, 2021 IL App (1st) 201269-U , ¶¶ 4- 11, 33 (applying section 4-102 where a police officer who had reason to suspect the plaintiff was driving drunk allowed the plaintiff to drive off without any investiga…

green Coleman-Napper v. CKEM, Inc (2023)

Rule Authority · S.D. Ill.

Furthermore, under Illinois law, a plaintiff cannot avoid application of the Tort Immunity Act by “pleading around” it and framing the action using “mere semantics designed to avoid a clearly applicable immunity.” Ries, 950 N.E.2d at 639 ; Prough v. Madison Cnty., 984 N.E.2d 1177, 1185 (Ill.

green Lampley v. City of Harvey (2023)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.

Prough v. Madison Cnty., 984 N.E.2d 1177, 1185 (Ill.

green Rodriguez v. Village of Park Forest (2021)

Cited (see also) · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see also

A plaintiff cannot avoid an applicable provision of the Tort Immunity Act by “pleading around” it and “arguing that their case [is] really - 10 - No. 1-20-1269 about something else.” See Ries, 242 Ill. 2d at 219 ; see also Prough v. Madison County, 2013 IL App (5th) 110146, ¶ 29 (“The plaintiff cannot avoid sections 4–102 and 4–107 of the Tort Immunity Act by arguing that his case is really about something else.”).

green People v. O'Malley (2021)

Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see

See Prough v. Madison County, Illinois, 2013 IL App (5th) 110146, ¶ 20 (“[i]mmunity from suit under Tort Immunity Act is an ‘affirmative matter’ ”); Romero v. Ciskowski, 137 Ill.

green People v. O'Malley (2021)

Cited · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see

See Prough v. Madison County, Illinois, 2013 IL App (5th) 110146, ¶ 20 (“[i]mmunity from suit under Tort Immunity Act is an ‘affirmative matter’ ”); Romero v. Ciskowski, 137 Ill.