United States v. Jeff Levenderis (2015)
green
· 38 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 23 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201520202026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
United States v. Miguel Angel Martinez (2019)
See Levenderis, 806 F.3d at 400 (“Defendant stresses the fact that the room was small and the agents sat closely around his bed while they questioned him.
“Defendant stresses the fact that the room was small and the agents sat closely around his bed while they questioned him. However, there is also no evidence agents prevented him from getting up from his bed.”
green
United States v. Jason Zabel (2022)
United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 399 (6th Cir. 2015) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
United States v. Cornelius Edrington (2021)
“When reviewing the district court’s decision regarding a motion to suppress, we review its factual findings for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo.” United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 399 (6th Cir. 2015) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
United States v. Seronte Newby (2021)
Such “claims are mixed questions of law and fact, which [we] review de novo.” United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 401 (6th Cir. 2015) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
United States v. Toriono Burton (2020)
United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 400 (6th Cir. 2015).
green
United States v. Michael Monroe James (2026)
Thompson v. Keohane, 516 U.S. 99 , 112–15 (1995); United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 399 (6th Cir. 2015) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
United States v. William Sidney Hitchings, V (2024)
United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 400 (6th Cir. 2015).
green
United States v. Renteria (2023)
Both “originate in the Geneva Protocol of 1925 and both are treaty- implementing statutes,” id. (quoting United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 397 (6th Cir. 2015)), and both are about weapons that are similarly accessible, cf. id.
green
United States v. Toddell Alexander (2023)
United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 399 (6th Cir. 2015).
green
United States v. Perez (2022)
The Sixth Circuit was most explicit: It noted that “both § 229 and § 175 originate in the Geneva Protocol of 1925 and both are treaty-implementing statutes.” That court thus elected to “follow the Supreme Court’s instruction and interpret § 175 in light of federalism principles.” United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 397 (6th Cir. 2015).
green
Decornick Moore v. United States (2017)
De novo review also applies to claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 401 (6th Cir. 2015).
green
United States v. James Eastman (2016)
United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 399 (6th Cir.2015).
green
United States v. Ramon Gaytan, Jr. (2016)
Although there is “an exception to this general rule” that permits “review [of] an ineffective-assistanee-of-counsel claim on direct appeal where ‘the record is adequately developed to allow the court to properly assess the merits of the issue,’ ” United States v. Williams, 612 F.3d 500, 508 (6th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Fortson, 194 F.3d 730, 736 (6th Cir.1999)), cert. denied, 562 U.S. 944 , 131 S.Ct. 367 , 178 L.Ed.2d 237 (2010), that exception generally does not ap…
green
United States v. Billy Shepherd (2016)
United States v. Levendens, 806 F.3d 390, 399 (6th Cir.2015).
green
United States v. O'Neill (2015)
Id. at 2087-2092 ; see also United States v. Levenderis, No. 14-4004, 2015 WL 7003308, at *4 (6th Cir. Nov. 12, 2015) (“In its Bond decision, the Supreme Court avoided addressing the constitutional issue, holding instead that, as a matter of statutory interpretation, § 229(a) did not cover the defendant’s unremarkable local offense.”) (quotation omitted).
“In its Bond decision, the Supreme Court avoided addressing the constitutional issue, holding instead that, as a matter of statutory interpretation, § 229(a) did not cover the defendant’s unremarkable local offense.”
green
United States v. Shannon Matheny (2025)
See, e.g., United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390 , 401–02 (6th Cir. 2015).
green
United States v. Dante Watts (2022)
See, e.g., United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390 , 401–02 -9- No. 21-5302, United States v. Watts (6th Cir. 2015).
green
United States v. Leeshawn Howard (2020)
See United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 400 (6th Cir. 2015) (characterizing a thirty-minute interview as “relatively brief”).
characterizing a thirty-minute interview as “relatively brief”
green
United States v. Deandre Forrest (2019)
See, e.g., United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390 , 401–02 (6th Cir. 2015).
green
United States v. Le (2018)
See, e.g., United States v. Levenderis , 806 F.3d 390 , 395 (6th Cir. 2015) (affirming § 175(a) conviction for possession of ricin).
affirming § 175(a) conviction for possession of ricin
green
United States v. Navarius Westberry (2018)
See United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390 , 401–02 (6th Cir. 2015).
green
United States v. George Rafidi (2018)
See United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 402 (6th Cir. 2015) -5- No. 17-3203, United States v. Rafidi (holding that a “small window into defense counsel’s thought process” was insufficient to resolve the defendant’s ineffective-assistance claim on direct appeal).
green
United States v. Darrell Johnson (2016)
See United States v. Levenderis, 806 F.3d 390, 401 (6th Cir. 2015).