Cluster 318716 (1974)
green
· 30 citation events
across 15 courts.
Showing the 10 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1973 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
197319992026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Freeman v. US Dept Homeland Sec (2009)
Hosp., 495 F.2d 1223 , 1225 n.3 (5th Cir. 1974) (“It is well settled . . . that a waiver of sovereign immunity must be specific and explicit and cannot be implied by construction of an ambiguous statute.”).
“It is well settled . . . that a waiver of sovereign immunity must be specific and explicit and cannot be implied by construction of an ambiguous statute.”
green
St Tammany Parish v. Fed Emer Mgmt Agency (2009)
Hosp., 495 F.2d 1223 , 1225 n.3 (1974) (“It is well settled . . . that a waiver of sovereign immunity must be specific and explicit and cannot be implied by construction of an ambiguous statute.”).
“It is well settled . . . that a waiver of sovereign immunity must be specific and explicit and cannot be implied by construction of an ambiguous statute.”
Hosp., 495 F.2d 1223 , 1225 n. 3 (1974) (“It is well settled ... that a waiver of sovereign immunity must be specific and explicit and cannot be implied by construction of an ambiguous statute.”).
“It is well settled ... that a waiver of sovereign immunity must be specific and explicit and cannot be implied by construction of an ambiguous statute.”
green
Brown v. United States of America (2023)
Hosp., 495 F.2d 1223 , 1225 n.3 (5th Cir. 1974) (“It is well settled . . . that a waiver of sovereign immunity must be specific and explicit and cannot be implied by construction of an ambiguous statute.”).
“It is well settled . . . that a waiver of sovereign immunity must be specific and explicit and cannot be implied by construction of an ambiguous statute.”
green
Ziler v. USA (2022)
Hosp., 495 F.2d 1223 , 1225 n. 3 (5th Cir. 1974) (“It is well settled ... that a waiver of sovereign immunity must be specific and explicit and cannot be implied by construction of an ambiguous statute.”). permits suits against the United States that are grounded on state-law tort claims for money damages.!7 An FTCA claimant must first “present [ ] the claim to the appropriate Federal agency,” and this claim must be finally denied by the agency in writing before the claimant…
“It is well settled ... that a waiver of sovereign immunity must be specific and explicit and cannot be implied by construction of an ambiguous statute.”
green
Fitzwater v. Veterans Administration (1981)
While this may well be true, see Petterway v. Veterans Administration Hospital, Houston, Texas, 495 F.2d 1223, 1225 (1974), the Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint, filed April 1, 1981, nowhere specifically states that said official was acting ultra vires to his statutory and constitutional authority.
green
Roberts v. Western Airlines (1976)
Hosp., Houston, Tex., 495 F.2d 1223, 1224 (5 Cir. 1974) (final administrative action in September, 1971, suit not filed until July, 1972).
final administrative action in September, 1971, suit not filed until July, 1972
green
Jones v. Brennan (1975)
Hosp., Houston, Texas, 495 F.2d 1223, 1225 (5 Cir. 1974).
green
MALECHE v. Solis (2010)
See also Petterway v. Veterans Administration Hospital, Houston, Texas, 495 F.2d 1223 , 1225 n. 3 (5th Cir.1974) (“It is well settled ... that a waiver of sovereign immunity must be specific and explicit and cannot be implied by construction of an ambiguous statute.”).
green
Davis v. Reed (1977)
See *413 Petterway v. Veterans Administration Hospital, Houston, Tex., 495 F.2d 1223 (5 Cir. 1974).