How cited: State v. Ahlers · Go Syfert

State v. Ahlers (2016)

green · 111 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
All Green 7
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201620212026
Sort: By significance · Most recent
green State v. Evans (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
Similarly, in State v. Ahlers, 2016-Ohio-2890, ¶ 12 (12th Dist.), we upheld consecutive sentences where the trial court made each of the required findings on the record in connection with its consecutive-sentencing analysis.
green State v. Janosky (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
"A sentence is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law where [a] trial court 'considers the principles and purposes of R.C. 2929.11, as well as the factors listed in R.C. 2929.12, properly imposes postrelease control, and sentences the defendant within the permissible statutory range.'" State v. Haruyama, 2022-Ohio-4225, ¶ 8 (12th Dist.), -6- Madison CA2025-03-008 quoting State v. Ahlers, 2016-Ohio-2890, ¶ 8 (12th Dist.). {¶ 14} "R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) does not permit an ap…
green State v. Venters (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
"A sentence is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law. where [a] trial court 'considers the principles and purposes of R.C. 2929.11, as well as the factors listed in R.C. 2929.12, properly imposes postrelease control, and sentences the defendant within the permissible statutory range.'" State v. Haruyama, 2022-Ohio-4225, ¶ 8 (12th Dist.), quoting State v. Ahlers, 2016-Ohio-2890, ¶ 8 (12th Dist.). {¶ 54} "R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) does not permit an appellate court to conduct …
green State v. Rogg (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
"A sentence is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law where the trial court 'considers the principles and purposes of R.C. 2929.11, as well as the factors listed in R.C. 2929.12, properly imposes postrelease control, and sentences the defendant within the permissible statutory range.'" State v. Haruyama, 2022-Ohio-4225, ¶ 8 (12th Dist.), quoting State v. Ahlers, 2016-Ohio-2890, ¶ 8 (12th Dist.). {¶ 11} "R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) does not permit an appellate court to conduct a…
green State v. Dillard (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
A sentence is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law when a trial court “considers the principles and purposes of R.C. 2929.11, as well as the factors listed in R.C. 2929.12, properly imposes postrelease control, and sentences the defendant within the permissible statutory range.” State v. Collier-Green, 2023-Ohio-2143, ¶ 12 (1st Dist.), quoting State v. Ahlers, 2016-Ohio-2890, ¶ 8 (12th Dist.); State v. Bonnette, 2023-Ohio-4430, ¶ 11 (5th Dist.) {¶24} In the case sub …
green State v. Rodriguez (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
State v. Collier-Green, 2023- Ohio-2143, ¶ 12 (1st Dist.), quoting State v. Ahlers, 2016-Ohio-2890, ¶ 8 (12th Dist.).
green State v. Bryars (2024)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
"A sentence is not clearly and convincingly contrary to law where the trial court 'considers the principles and purposes of R.C. 2929.11, as well as the factors listed in R.C. 2929.12, properly imposes postrelease control, and sentences the defendant within the permissible statutory range.'" State v. Graft, 2018-Ohio-2625, ¶ 8 (12th Dist.), quoting State v. Ahlers, 2016-Ohio-2890, ¶ 8 (12th Dist.).