Geri Siano Carriuolo v. General Motors Company (2016)
green
· 227 citation events
across 35 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2016 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
201620212026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
George Tershakovec v. Ford Motor Company, Inc. (2023)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983, 986 (11th Cir. 2016) (Florida) (holding that plaintiffs “need not show actual reliance on the representation or omission at issue,” even when causation is an element); Hess v. Chase Man- hattan Bank, USA, N.A., 220 S.W.3d 758, 774 (Mo. 2007) (Missouri) (holding that a claim under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act “expressly does not” require proof of reliance, though it does require causation); Thornell v. Seattle Serv.
Florida
green
Puig v. Sazerac Company, Inc. (2024)
“An objective test is used to determine whether an act is deceptive under FDUTPA, and ‘the plaintiff must show that the alleged practice was likely to deceive a consumer acting reasonably in the same circumstances.’” Marrache v. Bacardi U.S.A., Inc., 17 F.4th 1084, 1098 (11th Cir. 2021)(quoting Carriuolo, 823 F.3d at 983-84 (cleaned up).
cleaned up
green
Massey Mount v. Pulte Home Company, LLC (2022)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 984 (11th Cir. 2016) (cleaned up).
cleaned up
green
Fruitstone v. Spartan Race Inc. (2021)
See, e.g., Carriuolo, 823 F.3d at 985 (“In this case, the district court found the predominance requirement to be satisfied by an essential question common to each class member: whether the inaccurate Monroney sticker provided by General Motors constituted a misrepresentation prohibited by FDUTPA.”); Zamber v. American Airlines, Inc., 282 F. Supp. 3d 1289, 1300 (S.D.
“In this case, the district court found the predominance requirement to be satisfied by an essential question common to each class member: whether the inaccurate Monroney sticker provided by General Motors constituted a misrepresentation prohibited by FDUTPA.”
green
Lumpkin v. American Express Company (2025)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016); Rollins, Inc. v. Butland, 951 So. 2d 860, 869 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).
green
Puig v. Sazerac Company, Inc. (2024)
To satisfy this element, plaintiff must show that “the alleged practice was likely to deceive a consumer acting reasonably in the same circumstances.” Carriuolo v. General Motors, 823 F.3d 977, 983-84 (11th Cir. 2016) (quoting State, Office of the Att'y Gen. v. Commerce Comm. Leasing, LLC, 946 So.2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)).
quoting State, Office of the Att'y Gen. v. Commerce Comm. Leasing, LLC, 946 So.2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)
green
Duran v. Bragg Live Food Products, LLC (2024)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Moody v. Circle K Stores Inc (2023)
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338, 359 (2011); Carriuolo v. General Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 984 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
Ashley Owings, et al. v. Medusind, Inc. (2026)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 985 (11th Cir. 2016) (quotation omitted).
quotation omitted
green
Oscar Herrera v. Grove Bay Hospitality Group, LLC, d/b/a Glass and Vine, a Florida limited liability company … (2025)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 985-86 (11th Cir. 2016)).
green
Nate M. Landis, individually v. Quantum Capital Global, LLC; Quantum Bots; Adam LoPorto, individually; and Da… (2025)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 985-86 (11th Cir. 2016)).
green
Vidal v. The Hershey Company (2025)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 986-87 (11th Cir. 2016)).
green
Newton v. Brighthouse Life Insurance Company (2025)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 984 (11th Cir. 2016) (quoting Wal-Mart, 564 U.S. at 359 (2011)).
quoting Wal-Mart, 564 U.S. at 359 (2011)
green
REINKRAUT v. FCA US LLC (2025)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 985-86 (11th Cir. 2016)).
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016); accord Rollins, Inc. v. Butland, 951 So. 2d 860, 869 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).
green
De Ford v. Koutoulas (2025)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 989 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
Nuwer v. FCA US LLC (2025)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 985-86 (11th Cir. 2016)).
green
Lingard v. Holiday Inn Club Vacations, Inc. (2025)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 984 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
Top Tracking System LLC v. Castellanos (2025)
“And to state a claim for damages under FDUTPA, a plaintiff must allege: ‘(1) a deceptive act or unfair practice; (2) causation; and (3) actual damages.’” Id. (quoting Carriuolo v. General Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016)).
green
Rustik Haws, LLC v. Lime Press, LLC (2025)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016) (citing City First Mortg.
citing City First Mortg. Corp. v. Barton, 988 So.2d 82, 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
green
Council v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner (2025)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 985 (11th Cir. 2016).
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 984 (11th Cir. 2016) (“Under Florida law, an objective test is employed in determining whether the practice was likely to deceive a consumer acting reasonably.
green
Coombs v. Mitchell (2024)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016) (citing City First Mortg.
citing City First Mortg. Corp. v. Barton, 988 So. 2d 82, 86 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
green
REINKRAUT v. FCA US LLC (2024)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 985-86 (11th Cir. 2016)).
green
Pettway v. R L Zeigler Co Inc (2024)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 985 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
Figueredo v. Tropicale Foods, LLC (2024)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 986 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
Volinsky v. Lenovo (United States) Inc. (2024)
Count I: Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (the FDUTPA) “The elements comprising a consumer claim for damages under [the] FDUTPA are: (1) a deceptive act or unfair practice; (2) causation; and (3) actual damages.” , 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
Hasemann v. Gerber Products Co. (2024)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 987 (11th Cir. 2016) (“A defendant may not escape FDUTPA liability . . . merely because a deceptive . . . statement later turns out to be true.
“A defendant may not escape FDUTPA liability . . . merely because a deceptive . . . statement later turns out to be true. The injury occurs at the point of sale . . . .”
green
Ditech Holding Corporation (2024)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 984 (11th Cir. 2016).
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 985 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
de Lacour v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (2024)
To bring a claim pursuant to the FDUTPA, a plaintiff must establish three elements: “(1) a deceptive act or unfair practice; (2) causation; and (3) actual damages.” Carriuolo v. General Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
ESTATE OF WILLIAM D. PILGRIM v. General Motors LLC (2023)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
Offley v. Fashion Nova, LLC (2023)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 986 (11th Cir. 2016) (cleaned up).
cleaned up
green
Gilbert v. BioPlus Specialty Pharmacy Services, LLC (2023)
Motors, Co., 823 F.3d 977, 984 (11th Cir. 2016); 3) the putative class meets the numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation requirements set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(a), Valley Drug Co. v. Geneva Pharms., Inc., 350 F.3d 1181 , 1187–88 (11th Cir. 2003); and 4) the putative class meets at least one of the three requirements set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b), Pickett v. Iowa Beef Processors, 209 F.3d 1276, 1279 (11th …
green
Josefsberg v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (2023)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 985-86 (11th Cir. 2016)).
green
Valiente v. Publix Super Markets, Inc. (2023)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 986-87 (11th Cir. 2016)).
green
Chapman v. General Motors LLC (2023)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
Greer v. Hagen (2023)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016) (citing City First Mortg.
citing City First Mortg. Corp. v. Barton, 988 So.2d 82, 86 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 989 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
Victorino v. FCA US LLC (2022)
Recognizing that Pulaski concerned 2 restitution under the UCL and FAL5, the district court further noted that the Ninth Circuit 3 has since applied that portion of Pulaski to a benefit of the bargain theory of damages in 4 Nguyen.6 Id. 5 Moreover, in Carriuolo, a case relied on by Nguyen7, in addressing adequacy and 6 the defendant’s arguments of potential class conflicts, the Eleventh Circuit held that none 7 of the conflicts raised by the defendant was fundamental includi…
green
Amara v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc. (2022)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 986 (11th Cir. 2016) (“FDUTPA recovery depends on whether plaintiffs pay a premium[.]”); see also Debernardis v. IQ Formulations, LLC, 942 F.3d 1076, 1088 (11th Cir. 2019) (“Because the plaintiffs were deprived of the entire benefit of their bargain, we conclude they adequately alleged that they experienced economic loss.”).
“FDUTPA recovery depends on whether plaintiffs pay a premium[.]”
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
Wicked Grips LLC v. Badaan (2022)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016).
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 984 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
McCumber v. Invitation Homes Inc (2022)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
Desue v. 20/20 Eye Care Network, Inc. (2022)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 985-86 (11th Cir. 2016); Rollins, Inc. v. Butland, 951 So. 2d 860, 869 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).
green
Hallback v. Carrington Mortgage Services LLC (2022)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
Harman v. Taurus International Manufacturing, Inc. (CONSOLIDATED FOR DISCOVERY PROCEEDINGS) (2022)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 983 (11th Cir. 2016).
green
Simmons v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
Motors Co., 823 F.3d 977, 984 (11th Cir. 2016) (“Under Florida law, an objective test is employed in determining whether the practice was likely to deceive a consumer acting reasonably.”)).
“Under Florida law, an objective test is employed in determining whether the practice was likely to deceive a consumer acting reasonably.”
green
Dickens ex rel. Estate v. GC Servs. Ltd. (2018)
Motors Co. , 823 F.3d 977 , 988 (11th Cir. 2016) ("individualized damages calculations are insufficient to foreclose the possibility of class certification, especially when, as here, the central liability question is so clearly common to each class member."). "[I]ndividual damages defeat predominance if computing them will be so complex, fact-specific, and difficult that the burden on the court system would be simply intolerable." Brown v. Electrolux Home Prod., Inc. , 817 F…
"individualized damages calculations are insufficient to foreclose the possibility of class certification, especially when, as here, the central liability question is so clearly common to each class member."